Jun 15
Why don't you ever acknowledge the fact that billionaires have been pushing mass migration because it stagnates wages, pushes up housing costs and reduces the chance of workforce unionisation?
31
Jun 14
The problem is propaganda and cowardice and unionisation in the deliberate long term divide mechanisms used by the crown. Shame really.
25
Jun 14
The purpose of privatisation is to prevent unionisation and workers having more control than employers. There are times when workers having control is really important and there are times when it is a risk to society. As usual, everything is hidden in its opposite
2
1
501
Hang on a minute. Now you're accepting the ruling class are at fault. Correct, because they're the ones destabilising Africa / West Asia and therefore able to entice desperate workers from those areas to work for a pittance. No unionisation. Just cheap, easy labour to exploit.
2
1
22
Jun 13
Like I said elsewhere whats more common in capitalism is just being taken advantage of and a simple example is restaurants with no labour laws service workers in Murica are POOR , poor as fuck and trapped in service work and no frameworks to elevate them. Unionisation fixes that.
Jun 13
Fwiw I don't have a problem with the fundamentals of capitalism but you guys dont respect where you are in the food chain tbh and where and what ideals got you those rights. You would just be poor if not for them.
358
Jun 13
Part 6: Undocumented Immigrants are excluded from these benefits n take any wage offer. Any investor coming 2 open business in SA has to comply with country labour laws and basic conditions of employment. Using illegal foreign nationals means no unionisation and no negotiation
Chasing fellow africans is diabolical. In Kenya for example we have Rwandese,Burundians,Ugandas who camw to seek for better lives. We do not chase them away,there is always something for everyone.
3
Jun 12
lets ignore the fact that having many workers that are recent arrivals from different backgrounds lowers the chance of unionisation to begin with. If you manage to get everyone unionised then another 200 Inidans arrive and undercut you on every job. Followed by more and more.
1
3
Jun 12
And private sector office workers seemingly being allergic to unionisation / collective bargaining and the benefits it brings isnβt the fault of public sector workers who pay their union fees every month for the privilege.
52
Jun 12
Yes, the billionaire class imported millions of brownoids into western countries because it stagnates wages, reduces unionisation, thus enraging the natives. The best thing brown folk can do is defy the billionaires and go home
1
327
HOPE LIKE BEFORE THE CPI UNIONISATION DONT DERAIL AND PUT A HULT IN ITS PATH.. HOPE WB COME OUT OF ITS PAST AND MOVE FORWARD... AND CONTRIBUTE TO INDIA's GDP..
13
Dr Subroto Roy retweeted
Jun 12
Putting it differently, the Unionisation goal of "protecting jobs" should evolve dynamically to enhancing incomes by deepening human capital investment in new skills required for new jobs
Jun 12
Mr @JeffBezos is broadly right in what he says, real income measurement include choosing more leisure... what he and @vik_bajaj miss is this: workers have to learn and relearn new and old skills continually...you are not unemployed if a new technology makes you redundant in Old Skill A but employs you in New Skill B...so workers obviously have to choose to co-operate with the processes too, unions have to adapt ... @POTUS @BernieSanders
1
33
Jun 12
They aren't cheaper, this is about stopping and preventing unionisation IMO
1
7
141
Jun 11
Quite wondering when the radical liberal 'marxists' are going to inform me why mass immigration is a radical left wing policy and not a tool of successive neoliberal governments to control wages and unionisation
21
Jun 11
Aside from the fact that this universalism is poisonous Christian nonsense, mass migration is literally one of the most powerful tools of the capitalist billionaire class.
They love it. The Tory partyβs biggest donors all pushed for more of it because they love cheap labour.
Amazon tracks its own warehouses by ethnic diversity and tries to promote more of it for their own stated reason that more ethnic diversity reduces employee solidarity and chances of unionisation.
If you support mass migration not only are you supporting essentially a slow genocide against your own people, youβre directly supporting the billionaire capitalist class who import cheap labour - people who will never in their lives be net taxpayers - and pass the costs onto you.
1
28
1,136
It would be cool if Tracy organised the unionisation of the staff at Bridge Farm.
#thearchers
1
57
Jun 11
βAs a counter-strategy, Winter proposes β¦ unionisation β¦ simplification of tax codes β¦ financial transparency β¦ stronger revenue agencies β¦ reform of campaign finance β¦ election of our representatives β¦ replaced with selection by lottery."
2
8
2,320
Jun 11
Yeah, billion dollar companies have explicitly stated that migration and diversity enables them to undercut workers and prevent unionisation. "Those who have eyes, let them see."
1
1
6
Its just weird. If those devs did shit to jeoparodise the game for some kind of unionisation business or whatever or held up development to avoid crunch or whatever they doing theyre in for a rude awakening if the game isnt perfect lol
The standard they will be held to is high
1
21