Joined September 2008
2,243 Photos and videos
Pinned Tweet
Jun 10
The SpaceX AI1 Satellite is awesome! I love it! $SPCX BUT to put things in perspective, relative to a land-based data center: - A 120 kW compute payload = 1/2 a Rack - Today's 1 GW DCs have ~4,000 racks at 250 kW - You would need 8,000 AI1 Satellites for 1 Data Center - IF Starship (which has never flown successfully yet) could take 80 AI1 satellites up at a time (it can't), it would take 100 Starship launches for equivalent of 1 Data Center! - IF Starship launches cost just $100 Million each (Falcon 9 costs ~$60 Million), that would mean $10 Billion for JUST the launch cost, not counting the actual hardware (solar/chips/cooling/etc.) - These 8,000 Satellites would have MASSIVE communication delays relative to a data center with 4,000 racks sitting next to each other with high-speed fiber communication between the racks. I was more optimistic about space-based data centers, but if AI1 is the state-of-the-art of what we might have in say 2-3 years (optimistic since this is Elon time we're talking about), even those numbers pale in comparison to a land-based Data Center! Sigh.
SpaceX has just officially unveiled its AI1 satellite, the first generation of its AI satellite. Overall Specs: • 150 kW peak compute payload • 120 kW average compute payload • 70 kW per ton • Compute provider interchangeable Dimensions: • Wingspan: 70 meters • Deployed height: 20 meters Thermal System: • 110 m² deployable liquid radiator • Redundant pumping loops • Integrated micrometeoroid shielding • Deployable liquid radiators Solar Power System: • 150 kW solar array • 250 W/m² • SpaceX-manufactured solar technology from Bastrop, Texas Architecture: • Centralized compute module • Large deployable solar arrays • Deployable liquid-radiator thermal management system • AI-focused compute satellite design ("AI1 satellite") Elon: "The AI satellite is much simpler than a Starlink satellite. The AI satellite is essentially a lot of solar cells, you still need some laser links, but you don't have all of the super complex antennas that you have on a Starlink satellite. The easier one to design for is the AI satellite. It's bigger. A lot of this is technology we've already made with the Starlink V3 satellites."
166
23
166
55,896
Jun 12
Money won’t matter at 66?
Elon musk became a... Millionaire at 27. Billionaire at 41. Trillionaire at 54.
5
9
7,699
Jun 12
🤣 But also probably true! $700 is conservative though
Zuck, I’m begging you to rent just one GPU to someone else. Your stock price will instantly go to $700 and then you can raise equity for more data centers $META
4
22
7,262
Jun 12
This is just an incredibly lazy and bad take. There’s nothing wrong with becoming a millionaire/billionaire/trillionaire by creating value in the world. The reason entrepreneurs become insanely wealthy is because they create something that didn’t exist that people/companies are willing to pay for. Without entrepreneurs the solutions wouldn’t exist! The world would suck! We need to celebrate entrepreneurs in general, not paint them out to be villains. That’s just dumb. They solve problems that humanity faces. I criticize @elonmusk for asking for trillion-dollar pay packages from his shareholders (diluting them after selling his own shares) but only because he already has plenty of incentive/ownership/control in his companies, not because I think millionaires/billionaires/trillionaires shouldn’t exist. I’ll defend his right to be a trillionaire for creating things that didn’t exist!
Americans are struggling to pay for groceries and gas while Elon Musk becomes a TRILLIONAIRE. When the federal government is for sale, the rich get richer and everyone else gets shafted. The system is rigged.
44
5
111
12,008
Jun 12
The phone and voicemail has become unusable in the age of AI and robocalls/spam! I get less than 1% useful voicemails now which means I miss 100% of the useful ones.
10
14
3,520
Jun 12
I love that Ebots argue “he works for free! You expect him not to get paid!?” 🤣 All this is BEFORE his $TSLA and $SPCX pay packages! Each worth an additional trillion if materialized!
6
22
4,234
Jun 11
I get excited when a company’s revenues or profits grow like this chart, not their market cap. You know what company is growing like this right now? $MU!
12
5
71
6,089
Jun 11
Not gonna brag, but there's probably a reason why I'm outperforming Blackrock $BLK by more than 11x, all while my portfolio is 100% transparent and public. $SPCX
BLACKROCK PUT IN AN ORDER TO BUY AT LEAST $5 BILLION DOLLARS WORTH OF SPACEX SHARES PER WSJ $BLK $SPCX
7
2
37
7,834
Jun 11
It's hard to find a company with more potential than $META right now in my opinion. I just added more! The brilliant investors on Wall St. think Zuck is spending too much on CapEx, while at the same time they applaud $AMZN, $SPCX, $MSFT and $GOOGL for spending a ton on capex. For every $1 of revenue, Zuck's Meta earns more profit than any of those companies, and Meta is growing faster than all of them! Go figure.
23
3
118
12,946
Jun 10
We are about to go live with Ep 43 of the Buy Hold Rant Podcast: SpaceX, $RIVN, $AAPL and much more: youtube.com/watch?v=_AtCa-e9…
16
21
46
3,383
Jun 10
We’re now more than 1 year since $TSLA launched Robotaxis. Who would’ve thought that 1 year after launch, there’d only be a handful of them deployed!? I honestly thought they would’ve surpassed Waymo by now. Robotaxis are still less than 1% of Waymo’s size. Crazy!
132
19
280
87,866
Jun 10
The SpaceX AI1 Satellite is awesome! I love it! $SPCX BUT to put things in perspective, relative to a land-based data center: - A 120 kW compute payload = 1/2 a Rack - Today's 1 GW DCs have ~4,000 racks at 250 kW - You would need 8,000 AI1 Satellites for 1 Data Center - IF Starship (which has never flown successfully yet) could take 80 AI1 satellites up at a time (it can't), it would take 100 Starship launches for equivalent of 1 Data Center! - IF Starship launches cost just $100 Million each (Falcon 9 costs ~$60 Million), that would mean $10 Billion for JUST the launch cost, not counting the actual hardware (solar/chips/cooling/etc.) - These 8,000 Satellites would have MASSIVE communication delays relative to a data center with 4,000 racks sitting next to each other with high-speed fiber communication between the racks. I was more optimistic about space-based data centers, but if AI1 is the state-of-the-art of what we might have in say 2-3 years (optimistic since this is Elon time we're talking about), even those numbers pale in comparison to a land-based Data Center! Sigh.
SpaceX has just officially unveiled its AI1 satellite, the first generation of its AI satellite. Overall Specs: • 150 kW peak compute payload • 120 kW average compute payload • 70 kW per ton • Compute provider interchangeable Dimensions: • Wingspan: 70 meters • Deployed height: 20 meters Thermal System: • 110 m² deployable liquid radiator • Redundant pumping loops • Integrated micrometeoroid shielding • Deployable liquid radiators Solar Power System: • 150 kW solar array • 250 W/m² • SpaceX-manufactured solar technology from Bastrop, Texas Architecture: • Centralized compute module • Large deployable solar arrays • Deployable liquid-radiator thermal management system • AI-focused compute satellite design ("AI1 satellite") Elon: "The AI satellite is much simpler than a Starlink satellite. The AI satellite is essentially a lot of solar cells, you still need some laser links, but you don't have all of the super complex antennas that you have on a Starlink satellite. The easier one to design for is the AI satellite. It's bigger. A lot of this is technology we've already made with the Starlink V3 satellites."
166
23
166
55,896
Jun 10
Couple things I should’ve mentioned: 1) The “free” cost of electricity is pretty awesome benefit and for a 1 Gigawatt DC, that’s roughly $1 billion in annual savings. 2) Even at far greater cost than a land-based data center, it still makes sense to have some DCs in space as backup and redundancy. So despite the costs of DCs in orbit being waaay more than DCs on land, even after Starship and AI1 become real, it will still make sense to have some DCs in orbit. It just won’t be a replacement for DCs on land for at least 10 years.
5
2
16
3,039
Jun 10
This prediction is far far dumber than his “we’ll have fsd solved this year” in 2017! Even if Starship becomes a success, and takes up 100 tons to orbit, you’d need 10,000 launches per year, or about 30 PER DAY by 2031. He’s completely lost touch with reality!
1M tons to orbit should be possible in roughy 5 years
99
17
195
34,901
Jun 9
Just ask Claude “add these features” and ship it! Let’s go @Rivian!
The R2 launches missing a few familiar features. No Rivian Assistant, Climate Hold, or Pet Mode, limited Gear Guard, and no SiriusXM, Casting, or YouTube yet. Rivian says some are at least a month out. riviantrackr.com/news/r2-lau…
1
1
22
5,514
Jun 9
These $RIVN reviews and headlines means 1 thing: Rivian is well on its way to be the Pepsi of the EV industry. In every industry, there’s always at least 2 major players. Every Coke has a Pepsi. $TSLA has been the only Coke for EVs. But Pepsi has arrived!
$RIVN R2 review headlines are phenomenal. The most encouraging part isn't any single review, it's the consistency. Across nearly every major automotive publication, the takeaway is the same: Rivian appears to have a genuine hit on its hands.
27
16
174
21,151
Jun 9
From 1 -> 4 block 2 satellites for $ASTS if successful. 🤞 Could they actually demonstrate 2 calls simultaneously after this?
AST SpaceMobile Announces Launch Date for BlueBird Satellites 8, 9, and 10 businesswire.com/news/home/2…
4
3
4,658
Jun 9
🤦‍♂️ God damn it. I really was hoping data centers in space would happen!
Satellite Data Centers: Happening
5
35
9,197