Assistant Prof @ CityU of Hong Kong | Postdoc @KelloggSchool | PhD @umsi | computational social scientist

Joined March 2015
14 Photos and videos
2 Jul 2025
Dissertation chapter finally published! @MishaTeplitskiy @DanielMRomero @agnes. We show that men play the research game much harder than women. It speaks to the phrase "buzz men, warm women". The downside is that savvy players are harder to unplug from the game.
Men are much more likely to self-promote their papers on Twitter/X than women
1
3
242
Hao Peng retweeted
20 Dec 2024
New research from @sophiehsqq @haoopeng @UzziLeadership and colleagues suggests there is an association between promotional language and biomedical grant funding success.
The use of promotional language in biomedical grant applications is associated with increased funding success; gender, age, and grant amount explained most of the variation in the use of promotional language. ja.ma/3Vzqdbr
3
5
1,661
7 Oct 2024
Studies like this mostly compare fraction of faculties to US population. I bet the finding might be different if using the fraction of authors as baseline -- a lay person working in service industry is unlikely to become PI in the first place. People's choice matters.
First use of large-scale promotion & tenure voting data I'm aware of nature.com/articles/s41562-0…
1
164
11 Jun 2024
Innovation really involves two processes: ideation & communication. Our paper finds that promotional words can help to show the merits of good ideas in funding. Scientists need to pay more attention to the communication process to drive innovation success: pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.23…
4
11
1,299
Hao Peng retweeted
How are the merits of innovative ideas communicated in science? New research in @PNASNews analyzes the relationship between promotional language and the probability of funding, innovativeness, and citation impact. w/ @haoopeng @sophiehsqq & Henrik B Fosse pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.23…
2
36
106
14,106
Hao Peng retweeted
Researchers with minority ethnic names are written out of stories about their work. direct.mit.edu/qss/article/d…
4
113
289
53,447
Hao Peng retweeted
👀ICYMI: @haoopeng @MishaTeplitskiy & @david__jurgens show researchers with non-Anglo names are more likely to not be directly named in news stories and have their names replaced with those of their institutions. #Journalism #Media #AcademicTwitter wp.me/p4m9em-cXz

4
10
1,258
Hao Peng retweeted
“Scientists with East Asian and African names are less likely to be mentioned or quoted in stories that reference their work.” Findings from a study of US based media coverage by @haoopeng @MishaTeplitskiy @david__jurgens summarised by @k_langin science.org/content/article/…
6
12
1,273
Hao Peng retweeted
💥New: Researchers with minority ethnic names are written out of US science journalism @haoopeng @MishaTeplitskiy & @david__jurgens #AcWri #SciComm wp.me/p4m9em-cXz

10
13
3,216
8 Apr 2024
Why would name mentions matter? While, it does for us, at least in EB1A visa application.
Nice piece by @haoopeng in TheConversation about our recent work on biases in media coverage of scientists theconversation.com/us-media…
5
735
Hao Peng retweeted
Scientists with East Asian, African names less likely to be mentioned in news stories referencing their work: says study led by @haoopeng at @NorthwesternU (study authors note methods of identifying name origins likely led to some classification errors). science.org/content/article/…
1
3
152
Excited to see this research with @haoopeng and @MishaTeplitskiy getting covered. Representation matters in science news!
Scientists with East Asian and African names are less likely to be mentioned or quoted in stories that reference their work, according to a new study. @ScienceCareers scim.ag/6na
3
11
1,937
🚨 Is novel research worth doing?🚨 There are serious concerns about slowdown in innovation. Are institutions to blame? In science, does peer review discourage novel work? Paper with @haoopeng @mrblasco and @klakhani finds the opposite! pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.21… 1/n
5
71
213
Hao Peng retweeted
"This is striking as we also find that retracted papers are pervasive across mediums, receiving more attention after publication than nonretracted papers even on curated platforms..." A study in @PNASNews using the Retraction Watch Database. pnas.org/doi/full/10.1073/pn…
1
6
9
Hao Peng retweeted
"Overall, this analysis suggests that Twitter readily hosts critical discussion of problematic papers well before they get retracted. These discussions credit voices that are actively helping to improve science-related discussions in digital media." pnas.org/doi/full/10.1073/pn…
8
23
14 Jun 2022
Finally, we find that (3) retractions are not effective in reducing attention to retracted papers because they come too late. By the time the retraction is issued, most papers have already exhausted their attention. 6/
1
2
14 Jun 2022
In fact, 80% of retracted papers receive no mentions over the 2 months preceding their retraction. Retractions thus have a limited effect on curbing uncritical online discussions of problematic papers!
1