Nothing to see here! If you are creepily crawling all over my profile then it is evident that you have already lost the argument. Bye! šŸ‘‹

Joined April 2022
324 Photos and videos
Pinned Tweet
27 Apr 2023
Looking for a Grammar Nazi, who has actually contributed to any intelligent discourse or has displayed the most basic of abilities to think and understand ideas and information placed before them.
2
13
2,713
Headofgrey retweeted
You’ve got to laugh. Labour want to give 16-year-olds the vote, and the only social media they’ll allow them to use prior to that is BlueSky…
🚨NEW: Bluesky will not be included in the under-16s social media ban
46
87
730
13,910
Headofgrey retweeted
Lush, this is the reality of what you are celebrating & encouraging. Mastectomies save women's lives. They are not some cool & trendy gimmick to sell bath bombs or virtue signal during #Pride Thank you @sassyfeefee šŸ™ #women #breastcancer #Lush
Replying to @jan_murray
This is NOT a fashion accessory. I’d like to bet that most women who have undergone mastectomies because of cancer would be pretty pissed at those who are ā€˜celebrating’ this mutilation of healthy breasts. I didn’t have a choice - you lot disgust me.
27
92
563
10,246
Headofgrey retweeted
Some Labour MPs looked at the hammering they got in the local elections and thought another Assisted Dying Bill is the answer.
6
30
237
3,041
Headofgrey retweeted
If Bluesky is excluded from the Government’s proposed under-16 social media ban whilst X is included, it is fair to ask whether political considerations have influenced the decision. The Government should publish the criteria used to determine which platforms are covered.
🚨NEW: Bluesky will not be included in the under-16s social media ban
162
618
4,544
90,850
Headofgrey retweeted
Terrifying. @UKLabour isn't even hiding it's authoritarianism It KNOWS it's toast and will be out of office for a generation. This is desperate stuff
The online surveillance state has just been revealed. This is a terrifying prospect and we must do all we can to shut this law down.
14
66
286
3,616
Headofgrey retweeted
There must be criminal consequences.
What dismal news that the Assisted Suicide bill is coming back. They are hoping to use the Parliamentary override to force it through without any of the improvements and safeguards offered in the Lords last time including by the Bill’s advocates like Lord Falconer. We’re going to be offered the same bill that left the Commons (left with lots of ā€˜oh the Lords will clean up that glaring problem, don’t worry just pass it’) on a take-it-or-leave-it, unamendable basis. Even if you accept the case for assisted dying this Bill is terrible, far too expansive and full of holes to be filled in after it’s in statute… but the advocates know they’ll never have a such a ā€˜progressive’ Parliament for years, so it’s now or never. So they’re trying to push through a dangerous bill that they admitted needed significant improvement, because it’s their last chance. They must be stopped.
19
96
1,808
Headofgrey retweeted
TONIGHT ON @GBNEWS 9PM - The first time this story has been broadcast on television to the nationšŸ‘‡
What?! This is mental. It has been claimed that a secretive UK govt unit intervenes to write statements by the families of victims of potentially racially linked incidents to stop them from inflaming tensions further with their remarks. This is allegedly a secret unit called the ā€˜Research, Information and Communications Unit’ They reportedly try to manage the 'challenges' of multiculturalism. ā€œIts techniques range from planting stories in the media, using undercover operatives to lay flowers at the scene of terrorist attacks and even, in one case, sending a pop group to sing anti-extremist songs in Muslim schools.ā€œ Via @DailyMail
32
90
426
9,754
Headofgrey retweeted
I am very sorry. But you cannot have a functioning human society without certain key words. One of which is Evil. Lauren Edwards MP is evil.
Very sad to see my colleague Lauren Edwards MP bringing the deeply flawed and unsafe Assisted Dying Bill back as a PMB. If it was safe and brilliant why did the Lords sponsor of the bill bring 77 amendments in the Lords? It cannot just be brought back as it is and forced through.
12
97
505
8,809
Headofgrey retweeted
The attempt to control the narrative is so obvious : Bluesky is not in the ban Well said @Fox_Claire Say no to Social Media Ban - Trojan horse for digital ID verification We will be announcing more v shortly @Togetherdec
My brief take on @GBNEWS re Labour's 2-tier social media ban for u 16s. Somehow Starmer forgot to ban Bluesky. They're such numpties: so keen to contol how plebs communicate, they forget to control their own comms & make their biases blatantly obvious. wa.me/447976628584?source=ex…
3
86
241
3,586
Headofgrey retweeted
Bluesky won’t be included in the under-16s social media ban. Twitter will be. This is abuse of power.
275
1,330
8,980
55,858
Headofgrey retweeted
At 11 am tomorrow I will announce a major and long overdue tax reform. Reform UK will turn the tables on two-tier Britain. We will build an economy that puts British workers first. Always.
664
533
3,312
119,174
Headofgrey retweeted
Given that british under 18s are largely fans of controlled migration; stricter laws (even the death penalty!) And rather like @Nigel_Farage expect them to migrate to bluesky and er.... change its themes. This is just whack-a-mole until they are all bound and gagged. Free speech is dying so hard in the uk.
🚨NEW: Bluesky will not be included in the under-16s social media ban
62
167
1,149
27,448
Headofgrey retweeted
I took part in an alternative Desert Island Discs with @LBC. This is the story of how Without Me by Eminem went viral in 2024.
Good morning @RishiSunak.
153
167
1,011
102,580
Headofgrey retweeted
Ugh. This is DISGUSTING @LushLtd. Teenage girls love to shop in your stores and here you are happily encouraging them to CUT OFF THEIR HEALTHY BREASTS in the name of trans pride. This is beyond repulsive. It's dangerous and sick. No parent should allow their child near your stores. Please share: #BoycottLushNow
Dear Lush (cc Chelmsford City Council), As a woman who had half a breast removed last year due to cancer, I am writing to raise my concerns about your ā€œProud of My Stripesā€ window display. I am also, on behalf of other women who have experienced breast cancer, respectfully requesting its removal. Because mastectomies are not a fashion statement, an identity marker or something to be celebrated. They are something women undergo because they are ill, because they are frightened, because they are trying to stay alive. Around 59,000 women are diagnosed with breast cancer in the UK every year. Many will undergo surgery - a mastectomy, lumpectomy or other procedure. Others choose preventive mastectomies because they carry a high-risk BRCA gene mutation. If a woman chooses to have her breasts removed to affirm a gender identity, that is her personal choice. I honestly don’t know the number of women who have elective mastectomies for this reason. What I do know is that it is a tiny number compared with those for whom breast surgery is medically necessary and not something to be celebrated. I think I speak for many women who have experienced breast cancer - and for their families - when I say this: Breast removal surgery is not something I regard as cute, playful or empowering. Nor is it something I believe retailers should be celebrating. For that reason, I am requesting that the display be removed and that @ChelmsCouncil apologise for promoting it on social media. Yours sincerely, Janet Murray
346
2,209
10,849
237,926
Headofgrey retweeted
I was detained by Spanish police for two hours today in Madrid. Taken to the police station, fingerprinted, treated like a criminal because I showed up at the public square to have peaceful conversations about how children are being harmed. Spain has done nothing to stop giving kids puberty blockers and cross-sex hormones. While sitting at the station with criminals in handcuffs, I was able to contact @lukomski_sebito at @hazteoir using my Apple Watch, after my phones had been taken. These two beautiful lawyers dropped everything and showed up at the police station soon after. Now we’re back in the same public square. at Puerta del Sol. To the political authorities in Spain — please start protecting children in your magnificent country from this unscientific craze which is sterilizing children and causing grievous, irreversible harm.
62
901
5,305
50,789
Headofgrey retweeted
We’re holding one at 11am tomorrow mate.
I'm old enough to remember when Nigel Farage would hold a press conference at the drop of a hat. So why is he now launching his divisive policies in a blog post from the safety of his keyboard? I can think of 5 million reasons why…
145
170
2,013
78,613
Headofgrey retweeted
Congrats to GB News on its 5th birthday for destroying Sky News ( twice its audience) and humiliating BBC News which even with billions of taxpayers money is beaten almost every night. The secret? Covering subjects the viewers are actually interested in. The others should try it!!
79
494
3,656
42,160
I am disgusted by this Siobhan. @sussex_police please explain why you would push a women peacefully protesting to the floor?
So this is how Brighton Lefties & police think it's ok to abuse myself and my daughters , then say my daughter Rhiannon deserved to die at the hands of an illegal migrant. What do the police do? Fk me onto the floor! But not allowed to incite violence ,clowns 🤔
4
33
138
1,957
Headofgrey retweeted
Is this real 😢 I just gasped! You don’t treat a 5 yr old like that. He’s just a baby! 😢😢😢
šŸšØšŸ‡¬šŸ‡§BREAKING: UK Police just arrested a crying 5-year-old boy while taking away his father. Starmer's police dragged the terrified child into a car, then pepper-sprayed and the father and the man filming everything. What the hell is happening in Britain?
162
426
2,412
39,486
Headofgrey retweeted
I’ll have the video up as soon as I can. In Spain, it is legal to record police officers. You do not need their consent. However, as soon as the police arrived, one of them moved my camera and said I couldn’t record. I know my rights, so I moved it back. Then he turned it off, so I turned it back on. This happened a few times, so I’ve lost some video footage, but what they don’t know is my audio continued to record the entire time. I will post the whole video, and the uninterrupted audio later tonight. Again, it is legal to record police, but you cannot publish their faces, with exceptions. I would argue this qualifies as an exception, but I’ll be a good hombre, a good Cartelito Chris, and I’ll figure out how to blur their faces. After sitting in the police station for 2 hours, and after my lawyers arrived courtesy of @hazteoir, they released me with a fine. That’s what I was told, at least. However, this ticket has no fine on it. Their excuse is that I had a tripod. I set it up by a pole, out of everyone’s way. I had only been there for a few minutes. I had 50 yards of open space on either side of me, AND I OFFERED TO JUST HOLD IT IN MY HANDS. Problem solved. Or should have been. Once again, police have violated my rights just to get rid of me. I’m told a pro-Palestine rally went on in the same public square while I was being held at the police station.
I’m out of the police station now, and headed right back to the town square! This time with two high profile lawyers by my side. I was able to use my Apple Watch in the police station to message a friend at @hazteoir, and they sent lawyers right away. I’ve been given a fine, but police didn’t even write a number on it. There will be no silencing of Cartelito Chris today!
28
511
3,041
44,112