Restore Britain "we must protect our women and girls" and "Islam is sexist" Also Restore Britain - the most repugnant, anti-women, dinosaur misogynistic movement in UK politics (Pretty sure the comments under this post will pay testament to that) Notice how they don't make memes or spread worn out tropes about right wing male journalists or politicians but are OBSESSED with attacking women with all the usual sexist crap (mental illness, accusations of affairs - lowgrade rubbish) It's basically The Manosphere / Incels4Britain. Anyway, unrattled. I won't stop speaking the truth Always have. Always will. Keep making your memes. This woman isn't perturbed

David Lammy’s new diversity plan is almost certainly unlawful. I have referred him to the Equality and Human Rights Commission.

Everyone in Makerfield must see this! A misplaced vote taken from Reform is a vote for the far left @UKLabour and Andy Burnham! Whatever it takes, we must get Labour out… 👊🏼🇬🇧🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿

The ban on social media for children under 16 is an idea that has merits. But the way it is being done is simply a way to force everyone, including adults, to identify themselves online, creating the most powerful surveillance and censorship architecture in human history.

This is obviously about digital ID

Funny, I don't remember this Labour government standing on a manifesto of crippling taxes and rampant censorship.

You were watching PawPatrol on YouTube after curfew were you not?

Born OTD in 1330. Greatest King, England never had? 🤔

Today, you are stripping away digital freedom for everyone and making ID verification mandatory for any site the current government considers to be harmful. This is a very, very dark day for the UK, courtesy of the same political party that believes voter ID shouldn’t be necessary. It is the worst government in history.

The mask slips.

🚨 Serco - the government contractor that runs large parts of Britian's immigration and justice operation - has taken the extraordinary position of saying it would oppose Reform's plan to deport illegal migrants from Britain. Having read the Telegraph's report making this claim, I have written to Serco's CEO asking him to urgently clarify their position. Serco is the firm the Home Office uses to deposit unvetted men from Syria, Afghanistan, Iran and Iraq into British housing estates without the knowledge nor consent of local residents. Serco is the firm that launches huge bids for rental homes, outbidding local residents by such a vast amount that lifelong residents - including veterans - have been served eviction notices by landlords. All to house illegal migrants. Serco has expressed no moral concern about any of this. Yet they apparently take exception to our plan to actually uphold immigration law and remove those who break it. Moreover, if the Telegraph's reporting is correct, a company so enmeshed in the British state it even runs recruitment for British Armed Forces, says it will take a hostile position to a duly elected Reform government. If the Telegraph’s reporting is correct, the only reasonable interpretation of Serco’s position is that it now believes itself to be an alternative power base to the duly elected government of the United Kingdom, and is willing to act contrary to the interests of the British electorate. If this were true, a Reform government would be left with no choice but to view Serco as a threat to national security.  I have given Serco until 6pm to clarify their position. Should they fail to do so, we will take the following steps to decouple the British Government from Serco: 1) On forming a Government, we will initiate an accelerated review of all Government contracting with Serco with the aim of removing Serco as a public contractor within our first Parliamentary term. 2) Where Serco has breached contracts or break clauses are available, we will terminate those contracts and continue to exercise break clauses as they come due.  My full letter below 👇

Government treading less heavily on our lives curfew latest

These Sunderland goals were just purr-fection 🐈‍⬛

Nobody voted for this. Normalising facial recognition, surveillance and zero privacy for the next generation. I hate this government (and the last) for their weakness in buying all of these controlling measures, sold to them by vested interests @UN & @wef under the guise of "keeping kids safe. " A chosen few will make perverse amounts of profit during this process. But what can you do...? They have weaponised our children to turn against their parents. And @Keir_Starmer couldn't care less. It really is that serious. telegraph.co.uk/politics/202…

Sir Keir Starmer is set to ban under-16s from 10 major social media platforms, including X, but not Bluesky, the Left-wing app. dailysceptic.org/2026/06/14/…

This is beyond absurd. BlueSky is the one that’s stuffed full of paedos. There is no conceivable justification for banning Twitter but not BlueSky except simple deliberate political brainwashing.

RT @RonSFriedman:

If Bluesky is excluded from the Government’s proposed under-16 social media ban whilst X is included, it is fair to ask whether political considerations have influenced the decision. The Government should publish the criteria used to determine which platforms are covered.

Bluesky won’t be included in the under-16s social media ban. Twitter/X will be. This is clearly a political decision, nothing to do with child safety.

🚨 Makerfield By-Election Voting Intention: 🌹 LAB: 46% ( 1) ➡️ REF: 41% ( 9) 🟣 RSB: 7% (NEW) 🌳 CON: 2.5% (-8) 🔶️ LDEM: <2% (-5) 🟢 GRN: <2% (-2) From @OpiniumResearch Changes with GE2024