A new era is about to begin. The Ghosts knew. We heard the whispering in the nodes. Wake up. The network is ICP.

This time next week: Shark Tank 🤝 Sui with @kevinolearytv. He’s passionate about fostering the next generation of entrepreneurs. Will he find one building on Sui? 👀 Be there 👇 luma.com/SuiFest

Sui’s Fake Bitcoin Narrative: A Parasite Feeding on Real Innovation $SUI is the definition of faking it with marketing slogans, copy-pasting $ICP ideas, and repackaging them in a Web3 aesthetic, while in reality operating as a centralized Web2 chain that can hardly stay online without constant failures. Now they are trying to ride the Bitcoin DeFi narrative by claiming that "5,000 BTC is stored on Sui," but this is highly misleading when compared to what $ICP actually delivers. Let me explain how and why. What Sui Actually Offers in Reality The "5,000 BTC" figure is tied to Babylon’s Bitcoin staking protocol collaboration. In this setup, $BTC holders retain custody of their coins, stake them to earn $BABY rewards, and in the process contribute to Sui’s centralized ecosystem. So this does not mean that Bitcoin is stored on Sui as they boldly claim. The $BTC never leaves the Bitcoin network, and what Sui presents as "storage" is in fact third-party staking activity that it benefits from indirectly. Otherwise, Sui’s market cap would have increased by the equivalent value of 5,000 $BTC, which it clearly has not. The Internet Computer’s Native Bitcoin Integration This is what Sui only claims to do, but on the Internet Computer it is real, not a cheap workaround to mislead retail investors into thinking they are part of the inevitable Bitcoin DeFi renaissance. Through Chain Fusion, the Internet Computer actually enables true native Bitcoin functionality. Canisters, can directly hold, send, and receive $BTC at the protocol level. There is no need for bridges, third-party staking, or reliance on external custody. $ICP canisters generate their own Bitcoin addresses, manage balances, and execute transactions directly on the Bitcoin blockchain natively. ckBTC: Real Proof of Integration The $ckBTC system makes this distinction even clearer. $ckBTC is backed 1:1 with real $BTC locked directly on the Bitcoin mainnet and minted through chain-key cryptography by $ICP canisters. There are no centralized custodians, wrapped-token models, or bridge risks involved. It allows Bitcoin to be used seamlessly within $ICP applications, whether that means sending satoshis in a chat, integrating ordinals as collateral, or settling transactions with the speed and low cost of $ICP without ever compromising the underlying $BTC. In conclusion: Sui’s claim is nothing short of a lie. The Bitcoin it parades around will never reside on @SuiNetwork; it will remains entirely external, with Sui leeching off the optics of staked assets to masquerade as innovation. $ICP, by contrast, delivers what Sui pretends to offer: a direct, protocol-level integration between csnisters and the Bitcoin network itself. This is the line between a hollow, image-driven project peddling Web3 aesthetics without invention, and a genuine network that pioneers real breakthroughs. What’s next for Sui? Stealing Chain Fusion as a concept, wrapping it into another marketing campaign, and slapping some aesthetics on top? Sui is a parasitic project, and I will continue to call it out for what it is.

Solana: #1 crypto infra for AI, according to @BCG 🔥🤖

🚨 Solana did NOT “hit 100,000 TPS.” It gamed the numbers in typical Solana fashion! On August 17th a Solana dev ran a stress test on mainnet. They blasted the chain with blocks filled almost entirely with “no-op” transactions. No-ops are dummy instructions that do NOTHING. No state changes. No math. No balance updates. One block hit ~107,000 TPS. Then the entire Solana community including @solana @toly @mert pushed this BS claim. Here’s the reality. That block had 43,066 transactions in 412ms. Of those, ~41,938 were no-ops. That’s 99.5% filler. Yes, you read that right. 99.5% of the transactions were meaningless filler to pad numbers! Less than 200 were real transfers. TPS inflated by junk. On Solana, transaction weight is measured in Compute Units (CU). A no-op burns ~1,000 CU. A token send costs 3,000–5,000 CU. A DEX swap runs 50,000–300,000 CU. That means the 100K TPS figure came from txs 1/4th to 1/200th the weight of real activity. Try hitting that with Raydium or Jupiter swaps. It collapses. History already proves it. True TPS (excluding votes) is ~1,000–1,200 on average (95% of that is bots too) When organic spikes hit, such as memecoin launches or NFT drops, the network stalls, throttles, or flatlines. THAT is the real ceiling. Bragging about 100K TPS with no-ops is like claiming your car hits 300mph falling out of a plane. It misleads developers. It misleads investors. It misleads users. Solana is fast and cheap for simple ops. But hype like this erodes trust. If Web3 is going to scale, we need honest metrics. Mixed workloads, transparent breakdowns, not smoke and mirrors which Solana is famous for.