Tweeting about Iowa sports from an analytical, level-headed point of view.

Joined August 2022
176 Photos and videos
We're getting hung up on the 2 score game thing, but not all 2 score deficits are equal. 16 means you need 2 two pointers JUST to go to OT, so scoring 2 TDs still only gives you a ~12% win prob. Get the FG (not a given, but high %) means 2 TDs is a 100% win.
may as well go for it
5
15
2,565
Also Proof that "the analytics" don't always say to go for it It's just that our instincts are almost always too risk-averse
2
484
So Troy's won 8 of its last 30 coin tosses. The probability of winning 8 or less out of 30 is less than 1%! There's a lesson here about random chance. If a team goes 8-22 in close games, or recovers 8/30 fumbles, they're labeled as terrible at those things, instead of unlucky.
PODCAST: Whenever you're ready to turn the page, let's look at what Iowa needs to accomplish on Saturday vs. Troy, knowing that Big Ten play is on deck. Also airing tonight on @1460kxno from 6-7pm! hawkcentral.com/story/sports…
2
1
7
1,261
By the same logic, Troy must be using a weighted coin in all of its games.
1
416
First 9 games of 2023 vs first 2 of 2024 Performance numbers are apples/oranges because of opponents, but usage numbers are fun to compare. Motion, RPO, personnel, play action, run schemes all see big changes.
11 Sep 2024
Replying to @iowaanalytics
Iowa
1
6
1,631
Iowa drops slightly on offense (#110) and defense (still #1) and now #22 overall
😍🤩 WEEK 3 SP RANKINGS 🙀🕺 * LOOK AT YOU, FIU AND TXST * That's ... a solid bounce back, Clemson * OU and Notre Dame (and App State): 😬😬😬 * Uh, 6 of the top 7 are SEC (and it's kinda hard to argue) * Georgia-Ohio State title game? Wow. How bold. espn.com/college-football/in…
1
803
Hawkeye Analytics retweeted
🚨Week 3 KFord Ratings Top 30🚨
22
54
354
52,030
49.4% for Iowa, which is a little higher than I expected. Iowa was.... 60% to win this game going in? This wasn't some horrible outlier performance.
Lowest postgame win expectancy in a win, Week 2: Ga S'ern > Nevada 8.7% Okla St > Arkansas 13.8% Oklahoma > Houston 15.7% (!) Ark St > Tulsa 15.8% Ball St > Mo St 38.2% Illinois > Kansas 42.3% NIU > ND 45.6% UVA > WF 49.9% Full PGWE list here: docs.google.com/spreadsheets…
1
766
He's right
Kirk Ferentz on going for two: It gave us our best chance to win the football game.
2
10
1,142
This isn't even the best logic, because it was the correct decision either way, but would you really want OT in that game? Wouldn't you rather take your chances on one play to win in regulation?
2
399
Lot of talk about the "great" run game, but Iowa only had a 32% success rate on runs. They just had 4 explosives that help the EPA/YPP numbers. That's great, but not necessarily super repeatable. See the 2023 Wisconsin game.
1
2
12
932
RT @gameonpaper: Iowa State 20 | -10.39 EPA #21 Iowa 19 | -17.07 EPA Full advanced stats from the Cy-Hawk game: gameonpaper.com/cfb/game/401… ht…
1
3
If Iowa State misses the FG, we are far less outraged about the same performance
5
17
1,796
If your goal is to be a top 20 team, you should not be trying to play every game close. You open yourself up to losing on one play. You're not going to win all of them.
4
4
66
3,464
Iowa State was the better team. Iowa State is a good team. We overreact to the most recent thing we saw. See last week 2H, and probably this week 2H. I'm not panicking. Questioning going for 2 is not it.
11
2
26
2,176
Do you sneak it twice if needed?
2
476
I'm not usually a "just run the ball" guy, but.... Maybe just run the ball until they stop you.
2
1
15
764
Iowa is outplaying Iowa State, but a lot of the success was in the scripted zone. We'll see if they can get more going now that Iowa State has seen the offense for themselves.
Your weekly Iowa chart, powered by @gameonpaper
1
5
1,443
Both of the FG decisions were probably fine, but it could be argued that they should have gone for at least one.
2
378
Duke runs the ball on 3rd & 5 down 3 Misses the field goal
437