Researcher at @gesis_org, interested in Graph Neural Networks, Knowledge Graphs, Scientometrics. Opinions expressed are my own.

Joined February 2016
8 Photos and videos
Jack Culbert retweeted
Well done, Elsevier and @STOTEN_journal ! Masters of the conflict of interest arts! When the journal editor also stars as an author in the same issue... what a masterpiece! 🤔✨ Can’t wait to read the next Erratum! @Spottingthespot @fake_journals @CienciaxPueblo
2
8
32
6,210
It really was an honour to present the Open Research Converter (orc-demo.gesis.org) at the Nordic Workshop on Bibliometrics & Research Policy 2024 in Reykjavik on Thursday. Find the poster here: zenodo.org/records/14222479
2
3
112
Jack Culbert retweeted
It's important to not stuff the peaks from underneath. 😆
3
5
63
4,187
Jack Culbert retweeted
🤯🤬 Outrageous! Untorturing an article with a Correction: A masterclass in @HeliyonJournal by @ElsevierConnect. Tortured phrases are signs of plagiarism: unethical behaviour. Fixing a few paragraphs without full article reassessment is no solution. x.com/gcabanac/status/169976…
> ‘sulphuric corrosive’ [acid] > ’heat movement’ [transfer] > ’weighty metals’ [heavy] 3 #TorturedPhrases, right? 😵‍💫 Clear signs of plagiarism in @HeliyonJournal @ElsevierConnect. The author's bold response pubpeer.com/publications/DE6… won't surprise you:
8
9
31
9,256
Very cool bit of analysis from @subugoe on the new Document Type Classification from @OpenAlex_org. Nicely done @najkoja, Nick and Sophia!
1
3
199
The Open Research Converter (ORC) is online! It was presented today at the GTM conference in Berlin. If you want to resolve DOIs to OpenAlex records at scale, ORC is the tool. Test it out: orc-demo.gesis.org Code: github.com/jhculb/Open-Resea… Slides: zenodo.org/records/13771828

1
8
952
Jack Culbert retweeted
Should journals publish how much they received for publishing a paper? In a recent letter published in Quantitative Science Studies (dx.doi.org/10.1162/qss_c_003…), I suggest that any Article Processing Charge (#APC) that has been paid should be noted on the published article. Moreover, the advertised APC fee should be given along with any waiver that has been granted. This is so we know the fee that should have been paid and what was actually paid. I also argue this data should be provided as part of the metadata stored with the paper so that it is easily accessible to those that want to access it. The alternative is to go through EVERY paper and key in the amounts manually. A large motivation for the #OpenAccess movement is to enable those that pay for the research (typically the tax-payer) to have free access to the results of the research they have funded. To be transparent, would it not be right if the fees paid to the journal was published as part of the paper? If this happened across the scientific publishing landscape, it would be a lot easier to find out how much we spent on publishing the results of our research. Views, thoughts, comments?
6
38
71
16,507
When is an article an article? We have compared document and publication types in OpenAlex, Web of Science, Scopus, Pubmed & Semantic Scholar. Read the preprint here: arxiv.org/abs/2406.15154 #OpenAlex #WebOfScience #Scopus #PubMed #SemanticScholar #Scientometrics #Bibliometrics
4
15
23
2,846
In our sample of 9.5M records, we observe significant classification inconsistencies between databases in both the record type classification, and further we analyse and compare the typologies present in each database for publishing venues, record types and document types.
4
5
384
Jack Culbert retweeted
No. This is not acceptable. The methods section is the single most important part of a scientific paper. If those details are relegated to supplementary materials, then it's not a scientific paper in a scientific journal.
113
458
4,429
522,053
Jack Culbert retweeted
Excessive use of words like ‘commendable’ and ‘meticulous’ suggests ChatGPT has been used in thousands of scientific studies buff.ly/3WncW6R

4
13
53
4,341
Another open research dataset released! AI research from 2010-2020, doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10997…. This dataset creates an open mirror of the data used in "Patterns in the Growth and Thematic Evolution of Artificial Intelligence Research" by Gupta et al. (doi.org/10.1155/2024/5511224).
3
1,473
Jack Culbert retweeted
Meet the experts talk "Searching the Social Sciences with GESIS Search" by Daniel Hienert @gesis_org Date: March 14, 13:00 CET Registration: us02web.zoom.us/meeting/regi… Overview: gesis.org/en/services/sharin… Demo: search.gesis.org/ Please share widely!

8
5
819
Jack Culbert retweeted
📣 We are happy to present the 6th edition of the CWTS Scientometrics Summer School! 📌 When: 26 August 2024 – 06 September 2024 📌 Hybrid: Online & in-person at CWTS in Leiden, NL #CS3 #Scientometrics cwts.nl/education/cwts-cours…
1
14
19
5,736
Jack Culbert retweeted
4 Feb 2024
Craving a comprehensive dive into leveraging LLMs for mathematical reasoning tasks? 🌟 Don't miss out on our systematic survey! Explore now! 👀✨ Great work with @ahn_janice030, @ruizhang_nlp, @Wenpeng_Yin.
2 Feb 2024
LLMs for Mathematical Reasoning Introduces an overview of research developments in LLMs for mathematical reasoning. Discusses advancements, capabilities, limitations, and applications to inspire ongoing research on LLMs for Mathematics.
3
18
3,478
1/3 India is a Rising Power in Research - is Germany Seizing this Opportunity? We just released a cleaned dataset of 22.8K Indo-German research collaborations 1990-2022. Find the dataset here: zenodo.org/records/10607235 #OpenAlex #Scientometrics #OpenBibliometrics #India #Germany
1
1
627
2/3 This dataset is used in an upcoming paper: Mir et al., The rise of Indo-German collaborative research: 1990-2022, and follows a paper on the difference of publishing behaviours in the global North and South: doi.org/10.1108/OIR-04-2023-… #Bibliometrics #GlobalNorth #GlobalSouth
1
1
1
136