Guys, it's called a paradox for a reason. There's no point in arguing which side is right.
It's like arguing whether the statement "this statement is false" is true or false.
One boxers have to believe that future actions can change the past (impossible)
Two boxers have to believe the predictor is not accurate (contradicts the hypothetical)
We're done rehashing the button question. Time to rehash Newcomb's Paradox.
Are you a one-boxer or a two-boxer?