LIGHT CAN PENETRATE THE BRAIN When used therapeutically this is known as transcranial photobiomodulation It turns out light in the red/infrared wavelength particularly can reach through the skull and up to 4cm into brain tissue! This has a various benefits to brain function

Suht mielenkiintoinen osoitus tekoälyn prosessointikyvystä: - Saksan liittokansleri Mertz esittää jokaisen lainsäädäntösektorin deregulaatiota. Säädöksiä on liikaa, tarvittaisiin uusi alku puhtaalta pöydältä. - Ohjelnointikykyinen tavis Christian Dean rakentaa ohjelmiston jonka avulla Grok-AI käy läpi KAIKEN EU:n kymmenien vuosien aikana rakentaman regulaation. Säädöksiä on kymmeniätuhansia. - Grok sorttaa kunkin säädöksen Säilytä tai Poista -koreihin. - Kun urakka valmis, AI on päätynyt suositukseen: 89 prosenttia EU:n tuottamasta lainsäädäntömassasta kannattaisi poistaa tarpeettomana.

Konekäännös: "Kommunistien harjoittamat omistuksen toimet ovat alkaneet Alankomaissa. Maassa keskustellaan aktiivisesti: - perintöjen takavarikoinnista jopa 50–100 %:iin asti - viljelysmaan takavarikoinnista (maahanmuuttajien asuntoja varten) - realisoimattomien sijoitusten verottamisesta 36 %:lla Mitä seuraavaksi voisi tapahtua? - kotisi arvonnousun verottaminen (jolloin sinut pakotettaisiin muuttamaan pois ja elämään pienemmässä asunnossa)?" Sitä saa mitä äänestää. Mutta tätähän ei tarvitse Suomessa pelätä, vai mitä? Väärin. Suomessa on menossa aivan samanlainen 'kehitys' järjestelmäpuolueen taholta. Minua jaksaa edelleen ihmetyttää, miten suomalaiset eivät laajalti tajua, missä mennään.

The math on this project should mass-humble every AI lab on the planet. 1 cubic millimeter. One-millionth of a human brain. Harvard and Google spent 10 years mapping it. The imaging alone took 326 days. They sliced the tissue into 5,000 wafers each 30 nanometers thick, ran them through a $6 million electron microscope, then needed Google’s ML models to stitch the 3D reconstruction because no human team could process the output. The result: 57,000 cells, 150 million synapses, 230 millimeters of blood vessels, compressed into 1.4 petabytes of raw data. For context, 1.4 petabytes is roughly 1.4 million gigabytes. From a speck smaller than a grain of rice. Now scale that. The full human brain is one million times larger. Mapping the whole thing at this resolution would produce approximately 1.4 zettabytes of data. That’s roughly equal to all the data generated on Earth in a single year. The storage alone would cost an estimated $50 billion and require a 140-acre data center, which would make it the largest on the planet. And they found things textbooks don’t contain. One neuron had over 5,000 connection points. Some axons had coiled themselves into tight whorls for completely unknown reasons. Pairs of cell clusters grew in mirror images of each other. Jeff Lichtman, the Harvard lead, said there’s “a chasm between what we already know and what we need to know.” This is why the next step isn’t a human brain. It’s a mouse hippocampus, 10 cubic millimeters, over the next five years. Because even a mouse brain is 1,000x larger than what they just mapped, and the full mouse connectome is the proof of concept before anyone attempts the human one. We’re building AI systems that loosely mimic neural networks while still unable to fully read the wiring diagram of a single cubic millimeter of the thing we’re trying to imitate. The original is 1.4 petabytes per millionth of its volume. Every AI model on Earth fits in a fraction of that. The brain runs on 20 watts and fits in your skull. The data center required to merely describe one-millionth of it would span 140 acres.

Let’s break down each burner: • Family = connection, marriage, kids • Work = career, business, ambition • Health = sleep, fitness, energy • Friends = social life, joy, belonging Each takes gas. Each needs time. But you only have so much fuel.

Good question. Sure, I can break my stance on climate change down for you to the best of my ability. Grab some popcorn! 🍿 First, the Earth has warmed up by ~1.2°C since 1850, though nobody knows precisely how much because of data quality issues (e.g., uneven station distribution; fragmented records, especially outside of the United States; station siting changes; and urban heat island contamination) that have not been, based on some of the evidence I have seen. But, I have no doubt that the Earth is slightly warmer than it was 175 years ago or that 𝑠𝑜𝑚𝑒 warming is due to carbon dioxide (CO₂) emissions. Second, contrary to what the online army of alarmist foot soldiers have 𝑚𝑖𝑠𝑙𝑒𝑑 people to believe, there are not really any so-called “fingerprints” that distinguish human-caused global warming from warming caused by other factors. Numerous peer-reviewed papers claim to have found a human “fingerprint,” but the only evidence that they have presented is that the anomaly of interest is 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑠𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑒𝑛𝑡 𝑤𝑖𝑡ℎ anthropogenic warming, but they fail to note that said anomaly would also be consistent with natural warming. A reduction in cloud cover, for example, would allow more sunlight into the climate system, which would warm the oceans. A warmer ocean—all else being equal—increases the rate of evaporation, which raises the vapor pressure (humidity) contributing to polar amplification and faster land warming than the ocean (e.g., Compo & Sardeshmukh, 2008). 🔗link.springer.com/article/10… / open-access: psl.noaa.gov/people/gilbert.… All warming, natural or man-made, results in: 1⃣ The higher latitudes warming faster than the mid-latitudes and tropics. 2⃣ Land heating up faster than the oceans. An increase in solar forcing would have essentially the same material effect, although we can probably rule that out as the cause since sunspot activity has been declining in recent decades. But the sun does affect our climate system in ways that have not really been thoroughly researched. In any case, the 𝒃𝒆𝒔𝒕 empirical evidence that I have seen to suggest that there is probably at least some anthropogenic “fingerprint” on recent temperature increases is stratospheric cooling. First, understand that in atmospheric physics, heat flux is measured as the power—measured in Watts (that is, Joules per second)—standardized per square meter of surface area. Next, the average radiation flux into the atmosphere is on the order of 239 ± 3.3 W/m² of absorbed solar radiation (ASR) averaged over a year (Stephens et al., 2012). This means that in order to maintain a constant surface air temperature the Earth's surface must emit 239.7 ± 3.3 W/m² back to outer space. 🔗nature.com/articles/ngeo1580 / open-access: researchgate.net/publication… Global warming theory maintains the direct radiative forcing of doubling atmospheric CO₂ concentrations (RF 2×CO₂) is 3.7 ± 0.4 W/m² (IPCC TAR, 2007). That means the net outgoing longwave radiation to space is reduced by 3.7 W/m², which creates an Earth energy imbalance (EEI) leading to a slight warming tendency in the troposphere (surface to ~13 km altitude). 🔗ipcc.ch/site/assets/uploads/… (p. 357) In the stratosphere (~13-50 km altitude), this causes a cooling tendency because less infrared radiation (IR) flux is moving up from below. These relationships were first demonstrated in Manabe & Strickler (1964). 🔗journals.ametsoc.org/view/jo… NASA satellite measurements indicate that cooling in the stratosphere has been observed since the late 1970s, although there has been very little cooling over the last 25 years, all the while the troposphere has continued to warm. 🔗nsstc.uah.edu/data/msu/v6.1/… That means that most of the warming observed since 2000 is likely natural OR perhaps caused by a reduction in stratospheric sulfate aerosol concentrations, in part an artifact of stricter pollution regulations in recent years. But, yes, I would agree with most scientists that the cooling observed in the stratosphere, at least that from the 1970s to 2000, is most likely a result of CO₂ forcing. So what? What happens in the troposphere in response to CO₂ forcing is a lot more nuanced. Why? Because in the lower atmosphere, we have feedbacks (largely cloud-related) and precipitation processes that affect the atmospheric radiation budget far more than CO₂. And, how exactly clouds will respond to tropospheric warming, if at all, is not well understood (and by extension, not well-modeled). What we do know, theoretically speaking, is that the direct warming effect of doubling atmospheric CO₂ (RF 2×CO₂) is actually very small; it is on the order of ~1°C (Wijngaarden & Happer, 2020). 🔗arxiv.org/abs/2006.03098 However, amplifying (or dampening) feedbacks that kick in as a response to forcing mean that the real-world value—the equilibrium climate sensitivity (ECS)—will be higher (lower) than the ~1°C figure that you derive from radiative transfer calculations. Three pieces of critical information remain unknown: 1⃣ Exactly how much warming has been man-made (since, let's say, 1950). We still don't know the answer to this because the coefficients that are used to ascribe anthropogenic versus natural forcings are all computed from computer modeling, not physical measurements. 2⃣ What the exact value of ECS is. 3⃣ Even if global warming is entirely man-made, is it really a net drawback to civilization? To break it down: • If ECS is <3°C, the climate system is largely insensitive to GHGs, and impacts are exaggerated. • If ECS is ≥3°C, the climate system is very sensitive to GHGs, and the warming could be a concern. The IPCC’s “best estimate” of Earth's ECS is 3.0°C with a range of 2-5°C. 🔗ipcc.ch/report/ar6/wg1/downl… (pp. 44-45) In 1994, using NASA's real-world bulk atmospheric temperature data, Drs. John Christy and Richard McNider from the University of Alabama in Huntsville (UAH) calculated the climate sensitivity by removing the effects of El Niño / La Niña and volcanic aerosol injection (e.g., El Chichón, 1982; Mt. Pinatubo, 1991). They found that the human-induced warming rate is about 0.09°C / decade (lower than observations of actual temperature increase). This, by the way, came with the stipulation that unknown mechanisms of internal variability or external forcing are assumed to remain zero. 🔗nature.com/articles/367325a0 The authors validated their 1994 findings in McNider & Christy (2017). Specifically, they found a near-identical anthropogenic warming rate of only 0.096°C / decade and a transient climate response (TCR) of 1.10 ± 0.26°K. 🔗 link.springer.com/article/10… / open-access: sealevel.info/christymcnider… Many other recent studies (e.g., Lewis & Curry, 2018; Scafetta, 2021; Spencer & Christy, 2023; Lewis, 2025) have all estimated ECS to be far lower than the IPCC AR6's “best estimate.” 🔗journals.ametsoc.org/view/jo… 🔗mdpi.com/2225-1154/9/11/161 🔗link.springer.com/article/10… 🔗acp.copernicus.org/articles/… The jury is still out. 🤷‍♂️ What's more, in order to reliably detect anthropogenic influence on the climate system, the EEI must be known to the nearest 0.1 W/m² (e.g., Von Schuckmann et al., 2016; Gebbie, 2021). 🔗nature.com/articles/nclimate… / open-access: nora.nerc.ac.uk/id/eprint/51… 🔗annualreviews.org/content/jo… However, the aforementioned Stephens et al. (2012) estimates the EEI to be 0.6 ± 0.4 W/m², which is eight times larger than the anthropogenic detection limits. And, the natural top-of-atmosphere (TOA) flux has a 6.6 W/m² margin of error, which is 66 times larger than the detection limits. This range of uncertainty remains in newer estimates, such as Loeb et al. (2021), which estimates EEI to be 1.12 ± 0.48 W/m². 🔗agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.… This means that 𝑚𝑜𝑠𝑡 (not all!) of the observed global warming since 1950 could be natural and scientists would never know for certain. Alternatively, warming could be mostly man-made, but, even if that happens to be the case, SO WHAT? That doesn't mean it is an existential crisis. The big unknown here are CLOUDS. ☁️ This is because (a) cloud albedo has far more impact on the atmospheric radiation budget than CO₂, and (b) how clouds change in response, if at all, to the CO₂ forcing is unknown. What's more, cloud cover can (and does) change naturally without our assistance for any number of chaotic reasons (e.g., El Niño / La Niña activity; ocean circulation changes; cosmic ray flux; etc.). Case in point, even a small decrease in global cloud area fraction (CAF) can more than offset any temperature rise caused by CO₂. Song et al. (2016), for instance, found that, 🗨️ “[𝐴]𝑙𝑡ℎ𝑜𝑢𝑔ℎ 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑔𝑟𝑒𝑒𝑛ℎ𝑜𝑢𝑠𝑒 𝑒𝑓𝑓𝑒𝑐𝑡 𝑐𝑎𝑛 𝑏𝑒 𝑒𝑛ℎ𝑎𝑛𝑐𝑒𝑑 𝑏𝑦 𝑖𝑛𝑐𝑟𝑒𝑎𝑠𝑖𝑛𝑔 𝐺𝐻𝐺𝑠 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝑤𝑎𝑡𝑒𝑟 𝑣𝑎𝑝𝑜𝑟 𝑖𝑛 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑎𝑡𝑚𝑜𝑠𝑝ℎ𝑒𝑟𝑒, 𝑖𝑡 𝑐𝑎𝑛 𝑏𝑒 𝑤𝑒𝑎𝑘𝑒𝑛𝑒𝑑 𝑏𝑦 𝑑𝑒𝑐𝑟𝑒𝑎𝑠𝑖𝑛𝑔 𝑐𝑙𝑜𝑢𝑑𝑠. 𝐼𝑓 𝑡ℎ𝑒𝑠𝑒 𝑡𝑤𝑜 𝑎𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛𝑠 𝑜𝑓𝑓𝑠𝑒𝑡 𝑒𝑎𝑐ℎ 𝑜𝑡ℎ𝑒𝑟, 𝑎 ℎ𝑖𝑎𝑡𝑢𝑠 𝑜𝑓 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑔𝑙𝑜𝑏𝑎𝑙 𝑔𝑟𝑒𝑒𝑛ℎ𝑜𝑢𝑠𝑒 𝑒𝑓𝑓𝑒𝑐𝑡 𝑤𝑖𝑙𝑙 𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑢𝑙𝑡.” 🔗nature.com/articles/srep3331… While it is politically popular for people to splinter into one of the two tribalistic camps that either (a) increasing CO₂ has zero effect on the climate, or (b) that it will lead to Al Gore's Armageddon, the truth is probably somewhere in the middle of those extremes.

A new study shows a thick ice cap in Greenland was completely ice-free just 7,000 years ago. The cap is Prudhoe Dome, which today is some 1,600 feet thick. The researchers drilled through the ice and dated the sediments below it. It turns out those sediments were once exposed to sunlight, meaning there was no ice. 7,000 years ago, summer temperatures were 3 to 5C warmer than today. This study shows, once again, that large ice losses have occurred in the recent past, caused entirely by natural climate variability - no CO2 forcing required.

A Brazilian scientist worked in silence for 25 years on something medicine said was impossible: regenerating the spinal cord. Dr. Tatiana Sampaio extracted a protein from placentas that acts as "biological glue" — recreating the conditions that let embryonic neurons connect. Six patients with complete spinal cord injuries regained movement. Bruno Drummond was tetraplegic after a car accident. Two weeks after treatment, he moved his toe. Today he walks, climbs stairs, dances. Her quote when asked why she finally went public: "I no longer have the right to be conservative." 25 years. No social media. No self-promotion. Just the work. This is what real science looks like.

EU haluaa Suomen Suomi – se pieni, sinnikäs, pakkastalvien ja sisu- iskulauseiden pohjoinen koettelemusten maa, jota vielä toistaiseksi uskalletaan kutsua isänmaaksi – on hiljalleen, lähes huomaamatta, menettämässä kaiken sen, mikä siitä joskus teki Suomen. Ei mikään yllätys kuin kansa nukkuu, ei vastarintaa mihinkään – pelkkää hiljaista liukumista kohti ”väistämätöntä”. Globalistien pitkään haaveilema EU-liittovaltio on vihdoin toteutumassa, ja Suomi liimataan siihen kiinni yhtä elegantisti kuin vanha kalakauppiaan tarramerkki pakastepussiin. Kyseessä ei ole enää mikään löyhä yhteistyö, vaan täysiverinen liittovaltio, jota monet jo nyt hellästi – ja täysin vakavissaan – kutsuvat ”tämän vuosisadan super-Neuvostoliitoksi”. Samat keskitetyt käskyt Brysselistä, sama ideologinen yhdenmukaisuusvaatimus, samat suunnitelmatalouden piirteet naamioituna ”vihreäksi siirtymäksi” ja ”digitaaliseksi resilienssiksi”, sama kyky määritellä totuus ylhäältä alas ja sama tapa katsoa epäluuloisesti kansallisia etuja puolustavia kansalaisia. Vain punaiset liput on vaihdettu sinikeltaisiin, ja gulagien tilalla on nyt hiljaisia some-varjoja sekä sakkoja väärästä sanamuodosta. Tervetuloa siis uuteen todellisuuteen, jossa itsenäinen Suomi jää historiaan samalla tavalla kuin itsenäinen DDR tai itsenäinen Neuvosto-Viro: ensin muodollisesti olemassa, sitten käytännössä paperilla, ja lopulta senioritalojen puheissa. Jäljelle jää enää muisto itsenäisestä päätöksenteosta – ja sekin alkaa jo muistuttaa vanhan valokuvan haaleaa sävyä. Lopulta jäljelle jää vain nostalginen nimike Suomesta: ”entinen itsenäinen tasavalta, nykyinen pohjoinen hallintoalue nro 14”. Kannattaisiko vihdoinkin – pikkuhiljaa, ennen kuin on myöhäistä – herättää se kuuluisa ”massa” tähän päivään ja mennä sanomaan päättäjille suoraan, että tämä saiba riittää jo ? Tämä loputon Brysselin nuoleminen, itsenäisyyden tiputtaminen tippa kerrallaan EU:n yhteiseen laariin, kansallisten etujen uhraaminen ”yhteisen hyvän” alttarille (joka käytännössä tarkoittaa Saksan ja Ranskan etujen ajamista), ja se ikuinen mantra ”meillä ei ole vaihtoehtoa” – se riittää jo. Herätkää siihen, että Suomi ei ole enää itsenäinen toimija, vaan pelkkä pohjoinen provinssi liittovaltiokehityksessä, jota edelleen kutsutaan ”yhteistyöksi”, vaikka se on jo pitkään ollut pelkkää alistumista. Päättäjät eivät kuule, ellei kansa karju yhteen ääneen. Taitaa olla viimeiset ajat heräillä muumilaaksossa. Onnea matkaan Kuuntele klippi

UAH satellite data show global temperatures dropped to just 0.3C above baseline in Dec 2025. Satellites measure the atmosphere directly. There is no surface station bias, no urban heat contamination, no agency homogenization 'adjustments'. These satellites show the expected cooling following the 2022 Hunga-Tonga volcanic eruption - a massive submarine explosion that injected an unprecedented volume of water vapor into the atmosphere. Water vapor being by far the strongest greenhouse gas, what followed was a strong warming influence, but one that is now fading. December's anomaly actually sits within the long-term range, with similar values occurring in the 2010s, 2000s & 1990s (despite steadily rising CO2). We're even on par with Dec 1987. Global temps have returned to pre-eruption levels just as Solar Cycle 25 slides toward its minimum. All eyes on what follows.

CALIFORNIA BILLIONAIRE EXODUS HITS NEW RECORD HIGH • Mark Zuckerberg – $229B • Larry Page – $271B • Sergey Brin – $250B • Larry Ellison – $199B • Peter Thiel – $27.5B • Don Hankey – $8.2B • Combined wealth fleeing: Over $1 TRILLION People are leaving at record rates....U-Haul literally ran out of trucks All thanks to socialist dictator Gavin Newscum Under Newsom’s reign of terror: California has lost more residents than any state domestically for 6 straight years Highest state income tax in America The top 1% already pays 40% of California’s tax revenue ($122 BILLION) Now they want a 5% wealth tax on top of that Newscum turned the Golden State into a golden prison He taxed the middle class into poverty. Now he’s chasing away the billionaires who fund 40% of his budget When they leave, who pays for his socialist utopia? YOU The damage is done. Silicon Valley built the modern world in California. Now they’re building their next empires in Florida and Nevada California is committing economic suicide, and Newscum is holding the gun

In 2016, the Netherlands Meteorological Institute adjusted temperatures at De Bilt - the country's main climate station. Daily maximums from 1901 to 1950 were lowered by up to 1.9C, which removed 16 of 23 heatwaves from the record. The altered data were then used to claim modern heatwaves were unprecedented. Four researchers challenged the changes. But the institute dismissed the criticism. So the analysis went to peer review. In 2021, it was published, conclusively demonstrating the method systematically erased historical heat extremes. Today, the Meteorological Institute has quietly changed its approach, and as a result, seven erased heatwaves have been restored. Here again, we have a government agency caught rewriting climate history. The Netherlands Meteorological Institute erased heatwaves of the past, ignored critics, and reinstated the truth only when the evidence became impossible to ignore. Policies were built on that manipulated record. Dutch farmers lost livelihoods. Industry and the wider economy paid the price. But accountability is coming...

RT @anika_climate: MET OFFICE EXPOSE: A British government agency, The Met Office came under scrutiny at the end of 2024 after private inve…

Tuliko sinullekin vastaan tällainen Yhdysvaltain edustajainhuoneen hämmentävä selvitys? Niin minullekin. NotebookLM teki siitä meille muutaman minuutin yhteenvedon.

Milein toteuttama täyskäännös Argentiinan talouspolitiikassa on uskomattoman nopea jopa kaltaiselleni markkinauskovaiselle. Ajatelkaa: vielä vuonna 2023 Argentiinan julkinen velka ylitti 130% bruttokansantuotteesta. Vuoden 2025 loppuun mennessä tuo sama suhdeluku on 48%. Ja tämä yksinkertaisesti niillä samantyyppisillä toimilla kuin mistä PB paasaa: julkisen sektorin reippaat leikkaukset, sääntelyn purkaminen, valuuttakontrollien vapauttaminen ja nyt jo ensimmäiset veronalennukset. Voitte uskoa, että veronalennuksia on tulossa jatkossa lisää - ja sitä myötä Argentiinan talouskasvu spurttaa entisestään. ¡Viva la libertad, carajo!

Internet find on the situation in Iran As a member of one of the internal security forces, I am forced to remain anonymous for security reasons. Nevertheless, I consider it necessary to pass on this very important information to the public. Based on the doctrine announced by the Islamic Republic, it has been decided that, at the same time as the start of American attacks, a large number of residential areas and cities in our own country will be attacked with missiles and drones in the very first moments. According to this scenario, images of attacks on civilians, especially women and children, will be published immediately afterwards in order to turn world public opinion against the Islamic Republic and manipulate it. One of the reasons for the severely restricted internet connection in recent days is the preparation of the infrastructure for the so-called "white internet" throughout the country. This internet is only available to certain institutions so that they can simultaneously send images and videos to Arab media and news agencies allied with the Islamic Republic. The main goal of this oppressive plan is to influence international public opinion and change the global climate of opinion – a climate that has currently developed strongly against Ali Khamenei and in favour of Donald Trump. By implementing this plan, Ali Khamenei is pursuing two goals simultaneously: 1. Revenge on the Iranian people 2. Deception of national and international public opinion by shedding the blood of innocent civilians

‼️‼️‼️🇨🇳👀 Media reports claim that Chinese military forces have taken control of the Forbidden City in Beijing. Footage is also circulating showing troops entering the Chinese capital. According to information spreading on Weibo (China’s equivalent of X and Facebook), all official accounts of military institutions are reportedly offline. 🔴 Unconfirmed reports further suggest that the coup attempt has failed and that there was an attempt on the life of Xi Jinping. See the latest updates with us: @NSTRIKE1231

In a series of breakthrough experiments, scientists have demonstrated the ability to transmit electricity wirelessly through the air—using nothing more than high-intensity ultrasonic sound waves and focused laser beams. Researchers at the University of Helsinki and University of Oulu are placing Finland at the forefront of this emerging wireless energy revolution. One of the most visually striking innovations involves acoustic plasma channels: powerful ultrasonic waves create invisible, low-density paths in the atmosphere that guide electrical discharges (sparks) precisely along a controlled trajectory. This "acoustic wire" acts like an invisible conduit, allowing electricity to jump through open space without any physical conductor. Still in the lab phase, the technique hints at transformative applications: contactless charging, plug-free smart surfaces, dynamic electrical connections in robotics, or even temporary power links in hard-to-reach environments. Parallel efforts are pushing the boundaries further: - Power-by-light systems use high-powered lasers to beam energy across distances to photovoltaic receivers. These setups provide complete galvanic isolation—no electrical connection between sender and receiver—making them ideal for hazardous settings such as nuclear facilities, high-voltage substations, underwater operations, or aerospace platforms where traditional wiring poses safety risks. - Radio-frequency (RF) energy harvesting is turning ambient electromagnetic waves (from Wi-Fi, cellular networks, broadcast signals) into usable power. This "Wi-Fi for electricity" approach could eliminate billions of disposable batteries in low-power Internet of Things (IoT) devices, sensors, wearables, and remote monitoring systems, drastically reducing electronic waste and maintenance needs. Taken together, these Finnish-led advancements point toward a profound shift: a future where energy infrastructure becomes more flexible, decentralized, and invisible—free from the constraints of copper cables, plugs, and physical connections. While challenges remain (efficiency, safety at scale, regulatory hurdles), the convergence of acoustic, optical, and RF wireless power technologies signals that the era of truly cable-free electricity may arrive sooner than expected. [University of Helsink. Wireless Electricity Transmission: Breakthroughs in Acoustic and Laser-Based Power. University of Helsinki News]

Iran just ran the most sophisticated electronic warfare campaign ever deployed against a commercial satellite constellation. They succeeded. And it didn't matter. Here's the physics they missed: The regime spent $300 million on Russian Krasukha-4 jammers. Achieved 30-80% packet loss nationwide. Made video calls impossible. Made streaming unwatchable. Made commercial internet useless. On January 8, Crown Prince Pahlavi said: "8 PM tonight. Chant together. Wherever you are." At 8 PM, neighborhoods across Tehran erupted simultaneously. 31 provinces. 185 cities. The most coordinated uprising in 45 years. The generals optimized for the wrong variable. Netflix requires 5-25 megabits per second of continuous throughput. Revolution requires 1.3 kilobits. Once. A single protest instruction compresses to less storage than one pixel of video. It doesn't need real-time delivery. It can queue, retry, relay through whatever windows the jamming leaves open. TCP/IP guarantees eventual delivery. At 80% packet loss, messages take 5 attempts instead of 1. The message still arrives. Iran built a $300 million system to deny Netflix. They couldn't deny revolution. This is the hard floor of the digital age: the bandwidth required for coordination is 10,000x smaller than the bandwidth required for commerce. Autocracy has a throughput problem that physics cannot solve. The night they tried to kill the sky, they discovered the sky had already won. Read the full deep dive story how it happened.. open.substack.com/pub/shanak…

The U.S. Energy Secretary just obliterated Net Zero ideology in 60 seconds. Oil, gas, and coal power EVERYTHING including green energy. This is what adults sound like. Liberals are not ready for this conversation.