Hussie writes about this ("Homestuck", 2012, p. 4881)

We miss you, and think of you often. Session is wrapped. Spring is in bloom. I’m retiring soon. You two would have thrived in retirement. I trust you’re living it now. We have our arms wrapped around your kids. They’re remarkable. We love them.

honestly based, kennedy doesn't deserve to have his name on it either #tbh

Happy 80th president trump. You will never catch me

this is what the northeast corridor should look like along the whole connecticut portion. just go above everyone

comic sightseeing right to left (1/4)

HISTORY.

KNICKS IN 5

We’re really underselling a sort of 1958 level disaster for the GOP happening

warm day in the Atlantic

MAN OUT OF TIME | A Bryan 2012 Collage

something something social democracy is the left wing etc

Found more of these store facades y’all This post is really exposing how boring modern retail architecture has become

Happy National Seersucker Day! Great to join my colleagues from both sides of the aisle in kicking off summer with this time-honored tradition.

HIVESWAP!!! store.steampowered.com/app/4… ACT 3 COMING THIS WINTER!!!! WISHLIST NOW!!!!!

The way political websites (and websites in general) looked back then is honestly something I miss. This looks so much better than the vibecode San Francisco design.

Grifter

It's the opposite. During the mid- to late-19th century, suits were the uniform of clerks and administrators. Those higher on the social and economic ladder — such as lawyers, doctors, and politicians — wore the more "gentlemanly" frock coat with a silk top hat. In fact, Labour Party founder Keir Hardie caused quite a stir when he showed up to work on his first day as a Member of Parliament while wearing a tweed suit to show his allegiance to his working-class constituents. The press was shocked, noting that he wore a "cloth cap in Parliament" (a tweed deerstalking cap, rather than the silk top hat). With time, everyone wore the suit. By the early 20th century, those who owned the means of production wore the same uniform as those who managed them. Blurring this distinction can seem meaningless today, but it was quite a big deal in the early 20th century. Even manual laborers who wore more utilitarian clothing to work — chambray shirts, blue jeans, chore coats, etc — had a suit for religious services on Sunday. Thus, the suit was not a symbol of domination, but rather hid class markers. To be sure, there were distinctions in how people wore suits and where they bought them. In London, businessmen could be distinguished by whether they bought their clothes from a "City tailor" or a "West End tailor" (the West End being the higher-grade option reserved for those with money). But these were relatively minor and only for the trained eye. Relatively speaking, class symbols today are significantly more obvious not only through the different grades of quality, but also logos and general aesthetics. Hence, to some degree, why fashion changes so rapidly today — people are constantly shifting their social position.