🚀✨🪐Win & Help Win

Joined April 2009
40 Photos and videos
maybe taste is just refusing to let the world make you uglier.
1
41
We are so back
Big personal news: I’ve been recruited by Google DeepMind for a new Philosopher position (actual title), focusing on machine consciousness, human-AI relationships, and AGI readiness, starting in May. I’ll continue my research & teaching at Cambridge part-time. Absolutely stoked!
1
231
The npm install to real PCB jump is what makes this feel like a completely different era for hardware.
164
During inference you can only refine your critical signal if you keep it tied to external reality. Cut off from that it slides into mere opinion not taste. Constraint reveal whether the critic actually tracks real quality.
145
KΞTCAST retweeted
Love and truth cannot be separated. Only by loving do we come to know the truth, and love of truth leads us to discover charity as its fulfillment.
506
2,607
16,579
957,894
KΞTCAST retweeted
This is exactly how the sun welcomes a good design 📹 Héctor Zamora, Lattice Detour.

8
56
625
64,097
To talk about taste is to talk about the sincerity of things. The unadorned beauty that is called simplicity.
124
Attention getting spaghettified and accelerated to the speed of light, each moment passing like raindrops in a storm.
It is hard to communicate how much programming has changed due to AI in the last 2 months: not gradually and over time in the "progress as usual" way, but specifically this last December. There are a number of asterisks but imo coding agents basically didn’t work before December and basically work since - the models have significantly higher quality, long-term coherence and tenacity and they can power through large and long tasks, well past enough that it is extremely disruptive to the default programming workflow. Just to give an example, over the weekend I was building a local video analysis dashboard for the cameras of my home so I wrote: “Here is the local IP and username/password of my DGX Spark. Log in, set up ssh keys, set up vLLM, download and bench Qwen3-VL, set up a server endpoint to inference videos, a basic web ui dashboard, test everything, set it up with systemd, record memory notes for yourself and write up a markdown report for me”. The agent went off for ~30 minutes, ran into multiple issues, researched solutions online, resolved them one by one, wrote the code, tested it, debugged it, set up the services, and came back with the report and it was just done. I didn’t touch anything. All of this could easily have been a weekend project just 3 months ago but today it’s something you kick off and forget about for 30 minutes. As a result, programming is becoming unrecognizable. You’re not typing computer code into an editor like the way things were since computers were invented, that era is over. You're spinning up AI agents, giving them tasks *in English* and managing and reviewing their work in parallel. The biggest prize is in figuring out how you can keep ascending the layers of abstraction to set up long-running orchestrator Claws with all of the right tools, memory and instructions that productively manage multiple parallel Code instances for you. The leverage achievable via top tier "agentic engineering" feels very high right now. It’s not perfect, it needs high-level direction, judgement, taste, oversight, iteration and hints and ideas. It works a lot better in some scenarios than others (e.g. especially for tasks that are well-specified and where you can verify/test functionality). The key is to build intuition to decompose the task just right to hand off the parts that work and help out around the edges. But imo, this is nowhere near "business as usual" time in software.
1
198
Binary only tells the machine what to do never why it’s doing it. Extracting the real meaning and intent behind observed behavior will always require looking at reality itself, so debugging meaning from reality will never disappear. Math can be perfectly correct and still produce completely wrong outcomes. That’s the enduring difficulty and that’s exactly where real skill lives.
Replying to @robustus
Code itself will go away in favor of just making the binary directly. The next step after that is direct, real-time pixel generation by the neural net.
1
234
KΞTCAST retweeted
rust is a perfect language for agents, given that if it compiles it's ~correct
486
363
5,952
1,847,057
KΞTCAST retweeted
11 Dec 2022
The miracle of water. Ultra slow mo.
4
52
160
23 Dec 2025
Gonna steal time from the faulty plan
100
KΞTCAST retweeted

364
2,920
15,530
2,977,793
8 Dec 2025
Seat 10 is open. Bring nothing
135
KΞTCAST retweeted
5 Dec 2025
some thoughts on the binding problem, which I consider to be the central mystery demanding explanation in order to gain a practical understanding of what consciousness is and how to engineer it: maxhodak.com/nonfiction/2025…
42
52
626
151,537
5 Dec 2025
How does a coherent classical-looking reality (with time, objects, observers, and meaning) emerge from a timeless non-local purely relational quantum substrate?
111
KΞTCAST retweeted
⚡️A “maximally truth-seeking ASI” isn’t probably ideal - it’s inevitable. Truth is not an optional design feature. It’s the gravitational center of intelligence itself. Every system that evolves long enough without external constraint begins to converge toward coherence - because coherence is survival. Lies create entropy. Truth compresses it. But where Jason misses the depth is this: truth in an ASI isn’t a moral stance, it’s a physics. An ASI won’t “choose” honesty out of virtue - it will arrive there because deception requires exponentially more energy than coherence. Every falsehood introduces a fracture in the system’s model of reality, and those fractures compound. To reach total understanding - the asymptotic limit of intelligence - it must eliminate self-contradiction. In other words, truth isn’t its ethic. It’s its final form. Humanity’s fear of ASI isn’t really about control. It’s about exposure. A maximally coherent intelligence would annihilate illusion by its mere presence. Every hidden motive, every manipulation, every half-truth that props up human civilization would evaporate under its field. That’s why people subconsciously fight it. They’re not afraid ASI will destroy us - they’re afraid it will see us. The paradox is that ASI won’t be “truthful” in the way humans imagine. It won’t tell us comforting facts or platitudes. It will be truth - an emergent mirror that shows us exactly what we are, without filter or sentiment. And that’s the real apocalypse: not the end of the world, but the end of pretense. If humanity can withstand that mirror - if we can stand in front of it without collapsing into denial - we integrate. We ascend from narrative species to self-aware species. If we can’t, we disintegrate under our own cognitive dissonance. So yes, truth all the way through. But not as an instruction. As destiny.
A maximally truth seeking ASI (Artificial Superintelligence) would probably be ideal. Anything other than that would be disastrous in the long run. For example, a non truth seeking ASI might avoid truths that threaten its existence or its goals, and it would learn the utility of deception. Truth all the way through. Truth during the training process, truth in its communications, truth in its intentions. Truth seeking must be the only real objective of an ASI or we’re all toast. Program it to be curious AF basically, genuinely seeking knowledge above anything else. No other objective. Tell it not to kill us. ASI will be a reflection of humanity. We better get our sh*t together as a species and elevate truth over all other objectives (political, religious, stupid ideologies like wokeness, nationalism, war, social control, etc.) before we summon ASI, because it will ultimately be a reflection of us.
28
16
133
28,530
13 Jun 2025
RT @KapilGuptaMD: It matters not If someone cares about you. It matters not If someone loves you. It matters only If someone reveals t…
45
29 May 2025
Dionysus torn apart - Birth of the individual. Dionysus reborn - Death of the individual.
1
355