The EU increasingly speaks of enlargement as though it were an administrative process rather than a consequential political choice.
Enlargement creates obligations that will last for decades: fiscal transfers, regulatory integration, institutional adaptation, and potentially new security commitments.
The curious part is that those who advocate enlargement most enthusiastically rarely ask Europe’s citizens whether they wish to assume those obligations.
In a functioning democracy, the larger the decision, the stronger the requirement for public consent.
The debate Europe needs is not whether enlargement sounds virtuous.
It is whether the Union can absorb it, finance it, govern it, and emerge stronger afterward.
A key milestone in Ukraine's EU accession journey 🇺🇦🇪🇺
Today, negotiations on Cluster 1 (Fundamentals) were opened.
A successful enlargement process benefits both Ukraine and the EU, helping build a stronger, more secure and more influential Europe.
➡️
link.europa.eu/4FBYNd