trade by trade

Joined May 2011
111 Photos and videos

15
Lol and you think Israel will just let this pass. Dudes we are back to square one within two weeks. Even with signing. Save this tweet.
17
😭😭😭😭😭😭😭
TRUMP NOW SAYING HE WILL SIGN THE DEAL REGARDLESS IF IRAN SIGNS
54
🤣🤣
There will be no more negotiations for now.
24
Starting to understand why his investors freaked out when he went for the jugular in 2008. This guy just doesn’t give up 🤣🤣🤣😱😱 cut the loss already bro
Michael Burry added to $PYPL, saying the market has been “attending PayPal’s wake for years” while the company buys back stock “hand over fist.” He also added to $ADBE calling Adobe a “clear deep-value opportunity” with gross margins near all-time highs.
44
I sold asml 5 months ago because I thought it was too expensive. 🤡 Another lesson learned. Better to stick and use trailing stops on stuff you hold and is expensive with awesome short term drivers (eps revisions, acceleration actuals, price mom,…)
Do you think $ASML is overvalued?
37
Stolen. h/t to forget his name. But this is me. I’ve got 7% semis. 🥹Holy shit we missed a super bull by focussing on Hormuz. Never again. 🤣🤣 bro. Even after knowing the stats on geopolitical events (most are just bullish after a dip), still thinking this time different. 🤡
23
This
Thoughts on $ADBE $ADBE is one of the most fascinating stocks in the market today because it highlights one of the most important lessons in investing. It continues to execute at a high level. Revenue continues to grow, margins remain exceptional, free cash flow is enormous, and millions of customers still rely on $ADBE products every day. Yet despite all of that, the stock has struggled for years hitting all time lows. This confuses many investors, especially newer investors. They look at the financial statements and see a business that appears healthy. Then they look at the stock price and assume the market must be making a mistake. After all, if the business is improving and the stock is falling, shouldn’t that create an even better opportunity? Sometimes the answer is yes. Some of the greatest investments in history occurred because the market became too pessimistic about a business whose future remained bright. But it is important to remember that the market is not trying to value what a company earned previously or even currently. The market is trying to value what that company might earn in the future. This is where the story becomes interesting. $ADBE looked cheaper at $500 than it did at $600. It looked cheaper at $400 than it did at $500. It looked cheaper at $300 than it did at $400. Many investors looked at the declining valuation and concluded that the opportunity was becoming more attractive. Yet the stock continued to fall because investors were not debating the current business. They were debating what the business might look like in the future. For decades, $ADBE built one of the strongest moats in software. Photoshop, Illustrator, etc became the standard tools used by creative professionals around the world. Entire careers were built around learning Adobe’s products. Millions of designers, marketers, photographers, and video editors integrated $ADBE into their daily workflow, creating an ecosystem that appeared almost impossible to disrupt. Then artificial intelligence arrived and changed the conversation. For the first time, images could be generated with a prompt. Videos could be created automatically. Design work that once required years of expertise could suddenly be performed by almost anyone. The question investors began asking was not whether $ADBE remained a great company today. The question was whether $ADBE moat would be as strong five or ten years from now as it was five or ten years ago. That distinction is incredibly important because stocks are ultimately claims on future cash flows, not current cash flows. Imagine owning a toll bridge that earns $100 million per year. If someone announces that a second bridge will be built beside yours five years from now, the value of your bridge immediately changes even though today’s profits remain exactly the same. Nothing changed in the present, but something changed in the future. This is why investing can be so difficult. The numbers investors see today often tell a very different story than the future investors are attempting to price. A business can appear healthy while its long term competitive position weakens. At the same time, a business can appear expensive while its future becomes far more valuable than most people realize (ie $PLTR). The market spends surprisingly little time pricing the present and an enormous amount of time attempting to price a future that has not yet happened. This is also why one of the most dangerous phrases in investing is, “The stock is down but the fundamentals are improving.” Investors have said that about newspapers as the internet emerged, department stores as ecommerce gained share, and cable television as streaming began taking over. In many cases the current business remained healthy long after the future business had already started to deteriorate. 1/2 👇
2
1
489
These scatterplots always miss the point. Its univariate. Run Meli in a multi regression on expected sales growth, expected nopat margin, wacc, and reinvestment rates. Meli has been popping out as way too expensive for 2 years now in correct relative value screens.
$SE $MELI very attractive here. I’m not sure why they’re so cheap, maybe it’s that all the EM growth allocation is going into semis?
1
1
300
We don’t need more market news and breaking news and journalist chickens. We need to go back to the old journalism: research journalism. Deep dives. Doing the hard work. Finding things. Examining. Not quoting. Not kissing politicians ass. It’s disgusting.
26
You are a journalist. Try harder and get proof. Any monkey can quote hear say. Good God. Journalism has become a joke and especially finance journalism. It’s just writing aligned with market flow. Market makes the news. Not other way around. Bloomberg is living proof.
US Interior Secretary Doug Burgum tells CNBC that the US Navy has been escorting oil tankers and other ships throughout the Strait of Hormuz for a while, with some nights helping more than 20 vessels.
37
Macrotool retweeted
Trump: I’m attacking Iran. I’m not attacking Iran. I’m attacking Iran. I’m not attacking Iran. Markets:
1,355
13,123
74,128
4,021,875
Zalando zalando zalando
18
Kill me. I still have 9% energy equity in my portfolio. 6% from a year ago. 3% added like 3 weeks ago.
Oil shorts at highs
23
Why bother. Once they have 1 and they have multiple it does not matter if they build 1 million more nuclear bombs.
⚡🇺🇸🇰🇷🇰🇵 US South Korea Hold Nuclear Deterrence Talks as North Korea Expands Arsenal The US and South Korea held urgent nuclear deterrence talks in Seoul as North Korea rapidly expands its weapons program and boosts nuclear material production. Officials reviewed joint response plans, crisis coordination, and military readiness amid rising fears of Pyongyang’s growing warhead capacity. Analysts warn new enrichment facilities could significantly increase North Korea’s nuclear output. SOURCE: Reuters
31
Since 3 months most trustworthy account in terms of deal probabilities. Yet market gives no shit. This is incredible 😭😭😭😭 put me into an asylum as well.
None of their "demands" will be met.
33
Look. I have been following some Iranian accounts for months now. They always speak the truth about the reality of any deal that was announced. And yet, 200% of the main stream press keeps quoting bullshit. In all seriousness: WTF IS GOING HERE 😭😭😭😭😭 has everyone gone mad
16
Trump belongs in an asylum
Trump backs down.
2
52
Macrotool retweeted
Replying to @Rory_Johnston
Putting tequila café liquor in my coffee to remain sane
1
3
48
20,440
😂😂😂😂😂😂
No Iranian has contacted the bufoon in the White House.
23