Joined April 2026
1 Photos and videos
Marcus Raitner retweeted
A developer posted this on Reddit, and I haven't stopped thinking about it.
181
292
3,378
299,160
The Manifesto is now free and open-source: Why I put my book on GitHub. open.substack.com/pub/marcus


4
Marcus Raitner retweeted
The main thing that LLMs have done in software is bring back the idea that productivity is measured in lines of code per day. An idea that has been debunked, disproven, and discredited repeatedly every few years in my long software career.
50
132
1,404
25,228
Marcus Raitner retweeted
Pulse: Micro-Journal jetzt kostenlos und quelloffen dlvr.it/TSdL4g
1
1
496
Digitale Erschöpfung: Wieso KI Wissensarbeit intensiviert statt uns zu entlasten. Wer davon trĂ€umte, kĂŒnftig lĂ€ssig aus der HĂ€ngematte heraus, Agenten dirigieren zu können, erlebt gerade ein böses Erwachen. raitner.de/2026/05/digitale-

1
Marcus Raitner retweeted
“People who enjoy meetings should not be in charge of anything.” — Thomas Sowell
41
769
6,406
87,005
Marcus Raitner retweeted
“As Cory Doctorow, author of Enshittification, is fond of observing: you won’t be replaced because an AI can do your job, you’ll be replaced because an AI salesman convinces your boss that it can” Conned by a chatbot ft.com/content/eb6f5398-6635

14
512
2,070
50,431
Marcus Raitner retweeted
hahahahhaha
135
830
11,143
708,086
Marcus Raitner retweeted
Compiler construction is one of the oldest, best understood CS fields. It's decades of work by the brightest minds, and it's grounded in logic, informed by experience and strictly deterministic. Comparing that with LLM-based coding agents is just wrong. x.com/IceSolst/status/205025


Interesting article on treating agent output like compiler output (and why) skiplabs.io/blog/codegen_as_

119
424
4,837
168,782
Marcus Raitner retweeted
Adding agents to a late software project makes it later. (Fred Brooks’ observation, revised.)
20
61
477
14,924
Marcus Raitner retweeted
Having been part of the industry for 50 years, I can confidently report that none of this is true. Sure, writing code has a non-zero cost; this is true of any artifact. But you know what costs even more, Jonathan? Writing bad code; writing unnecessary code; writing more code than you really need simply because you think you might need it someday or you are too lazy or sloppy to clean up after yourself. Anything that costs nothing is often worth nothing as well, and results in significant unintended consequences.
For 50 years, software engineering ran on code rationing. Writing code was expensive, so we rationed it carefully through roadmaps, RFCs, prioritization meetings, and scope reviews. This created a role: the No Engineer. No, that won't scale. No, we don't have bandwidth. No, that's out of scope. No, we need a design doc first. The No Engineer was valuable for 50 years. Every "no" saved real money. Their judgment was the rationing system. LLMs will be the end of code rationing. Code is cheap now. And while the No Engineer is explaining why something can't be done, the Yes Engineer has already shipped three versions of it. If you're a Yes Engineer, the next decade is yours.
85
238
2,313
133,015
Marcus Raitner retweeted
As an engineer, I’d much rather write every line of code myself than review every line of code generated by an LLM
320
120
2,515
193,691
Marcus Raitner retweeted
Very soon, “no AI was used” will be a premium service category in nearly every industry. Mark this.
485
3,408
29,021
460,723
Marcus Raitner retweeted
There's a disturbing trend of developers I've known for years now suddenly being unable to discuss even basic aspects of software development. They have become so dependent on LLMs, they can't even describe how to design a system anymore. Feels like losing friends to dementia. 😱
17
26
380
13,012
I‘m not a top coder, but I can fully relate to that. Slowing down in the short run and in the long run. And it is just not fulfilling.
Apr 26
Top coders are going back to handcoding. Even with AI at Google and Anthropic, devs say it’s buggy and slows them down. AI scales. Humans craft.
13
Marcus Raitner retweeted
Its safe to say software developer jobs are fine despite AI I have 15 years experience in software development, and I know what to prompt, but still it takes hundreds of prompts to create an app with AI If you have 0 experience, you dont even know what to ask it. then what do you do when the app breaks ? non-devs have no chance to vibecode a production app devs on the other hand seem to get superpowers
235
77
1,295
68,198
Marcus Raitner retweeted
Anyone who thinks Claude or something similar can already replace a developer(I didn’t say replace coding, I said replacing a developer) has clearly never used it on a serious, large scale project. There's marketing hype and then there's the truth. It looks revolutionary if you don't code yourself. ‹‹All of these “influencers” using these tools have never hit the market with a working app. They all just yap how they were marketers and now their Claude codes while their sleep. With that velocity they should be hitting the market with new app every week, yet we don’t see it at all. If we pretend experienced developers are now obsolete based on viral videos, we're heading straight into an era of widespread, low quality code.‹‹And I can’t wait to charge a premium for fixing someone’s disaster.
63
14
203
10,138
Marcus Raitner retweeted
A common dynamic I observe with AI: it feels most impressive when you don’t know much about the subject, don’t care or don’t have a clear idea of what the you want. This applies across design, code, legal, and more. If I don’t know code very well, every piece of code it writes feels very impressive. Once you know what something should feel or look like, it becomes almost impossible to guide AI there. And you definitely can’t one-shot it.
257
393
3,455
571,820
Marcus Raitner retweeted
All the best programmers I know are starting to write code by hand again
665
337
6,688
1,485,464