Ja ich bin mir sicher das Netz wurde "überflutet' mit, hmmm 35 GW an strom
Und das obwohl das 2025 regulär oft auf 40 GW hochgelaufen ist
Und die Betreiber selbst haben ne ganz andere Erklärung
Hmmmm, klingt fast als wäre deiner Erklärung hier komplett politisch herbeigezogen
No one here is measuring Earth's thermodynamic temperature lmao
Climate graphs measure deviation from the respective local baselines, which cancels out any heterogeneity problems -> you are looking at 'how much warmer area individual area than usual?'
There is no age controlled average data from wealth, for both the US and the EU, comparing different methodologies is meaningless.
Also these average aged are off, your AI might have outdated ones -> The UK is within 1 year of the US if Iceland is to small of a model for you.
trailing behind both Europe and the US in approval speed, not sure why you'd expect them to be faster. And the reason why is pretty straightforward:
They want more extensive testing (or intentionally) have less streamlined approval procedures due to bureaucracy.
Not really, it has the same problems, higher income but less money left after expenses.
The US just has stronger mechanisms for funneling more of people's income to the 1%.
Most of these simply don't exist in Western Europe, PPP doesn't fix that.
Disposable income tries to fix this but fails as it only includes a few select deductions after tax and fails to include a bunch of necessary expenses
Discretionary income would compare how much money is actually left after all expenses, but has next to no comparable data points
100 miles is an endurance test dawg
btw the daily distance human hunters used to cover was 8 miles, compared to horses who do 20-40 miles a day so assuming neither is racing the other it's even more in favor of the horses
And thas after PPP adjustments before you think thats enough.
Missing a profit margin makes it systemically cheaper even after adjusting for i.e wage and material differences, it's a different system.
Outside we can't detect a lot, but there are plenty of candidates tho
TOI-141b for instance has plenty of "fires" on top of its magma, if the Atmosphere does infact turn out to be majority nitrogen
There's nothing to 'understand' cause the original point still stands, it's still a golden pile of shit among more shit, nowhere near sufficient to reliably predict academic success by itself
You should go ahead and read your own quoted source, the latest data are the whole year numbers from 2024
Besides that, if we accept persecution of population groups overrepresented in crime, the way forward would be to deport/imprison all young males regardless of ethnicity
But most of it exists almost entirely between the elites in the green area and everyone else
if you redistributed all wealth globally, most americans would barely notice it (global average wealth is $100k and us median is $110k) most ppl in that green area would end up *richer*
They are ofc still much richer / more privileged than someone from Africa who owns like $800 bucks worth of goods, but they do not make up the wealth that's represented for their country
Why do people feel free to just lie?
Wealth inequality famously isn't modeled at all, or only very simplistically, in macroeconomic models
Only during covid did we get a move from some economists towards properly modeling inequality, and it's nowhere near mainstream yet.
they haven't taken enough casualties yet to draft more young people.
They claimed about as much territory with their counteroffensives as Russia did with its offensive, absolutely fk all
Scholz was against the Iraq war when that was a thing, and was very (for most ppl too) careful in escalating arms deliveries to Ukraine
Highly doubt he would've as insane as Merz on this
You really are just proving my points here
Having to buy a second car cause neither you nor your wife can get around without one is the result of the infrastructure they're forced to live in, not a choice.
Buying a second car is a choice if you can live without one already
Same for education, you'd still compare against an almost non existent expense in Europe.
They get the same """lifestyle""", or education as you without having to spend nearly as much.
In that case you probably didn't quite get my argument, reduced to what each of the above industries delivers, they are the same.
By itself there is no "Corrupting society", same with alcohol btw.
>France wont station them abroad
>France offers forward basing
pick one lol.
not stationing them abroad is just the status quo.
France stationing nukes at the bases of other countries gives them a "veto" as with US nukes. Either you let the French take off or not.
Fact: The median brit is 50% richer than the median yank.
Fact: In the US you earn a lot but lose even more via living expenses, all that money ends up with the 0.1%, and factually *not* as wealth.
the creator is either good but not a "god" in the sense that he's a omnipotent God but just a technologically or otherwise relatively advanced being that had an input on the universe
or he is omnipotent but doesn't care or actively wants to mess with us
in case it's the former, ur starting to rival Biden on the mental decline ladder. Here:
and are still safer than Delaware *much like Maine, Vermont, and New Hampshire.*