my chess elo is higher than yours
Joined November 2025
- Tweets 4,628
- Following 25
- Followers 38
- Likes 0
310 Photos and videos
Pinned Tweet
29 Nov 2025
oh.. thats not..
29 Nov 2025
Just spent the evening with Trump @realDonaldTrump at Mara Lago - his STAMINA is Unbelievable for any age.
2
1,434
Id ask why they believe that
What if someone argued that unreflective consciousness isn’t enough to consider their lives valuable?
1
4
"I blindly asserted knowledge and can't come to terms with the consequences"
"I typed in 'dolphin fetus' and since you couldn't accurately distinguish between two things that look identical that means I win"
That's dishonest
3
if you want me to pull individual sources I can get that too but here's the summary
I’d argue they don’t
1
10
they have the capacity to be, yes
Are newborn babies aware of their own existence?
1
27
1 that's not the argument being made obviously theres a distinction the argument being made is you shouldn't argue from a point of ignorance, if you don't know just say that
2 nobody's saying this is a justification for abortion
yet to hear a valid non retarded rebuttal
1.) because a layman not being able to distinguish the human embryo from the dog embryo doesn’t mean there is no real distinction.
2.) because whether or not someone can tell visually if something is a human or not does not lead to the conclusion that it’s okay to kill humans.
3.) because there are no cases in which a human woman is going to abort a dolphin fetus.
7
"capacity for consciousness" would be the ability to be conscious even if sometimes you may lose that to sleep or to undergo anesthetic you still have the capacity for consciousness. consciousness itself is having awareness of ones environment and own existence.
define consciousness
1
37
"that doesn't mean they have the rights of someone with the capacities for consciousness" my argument is not set on the basis of fetuses being dead so your question is random at best. fetuses are living
Are fetuses dead?
1
17
dead people are a member of the human species, that doesn't mean they have the rights of someone with the capacities for consciousness
Because the argument isn’t that they look human, it’s that they are a member of the human species
1
39
amazing argument, because with this logic you're just saying all God is, is an idea😭
Jun 15
if human rights are real then why wont they talk to me?
23
now the cracker is trying to bring race into it🙏🏽let's play 20 questions see if you can guess my race
I am very pro abortion when it comes to nonwhites.
Why would you argue against yourself?
1
12
your arguing low iq points that i have never used against me as a justification for something i wasnt even endorsing at this very moment, on top of that youre doing so very poorly.
0/10 rage bait, would not refer to friends
You’re just a clump of cells.
I don’t think your consciousness or supposed past experiences are justifications for your life to continue over anothers. In fact, most abortions occur out of convenience. Ergo, it is convenient to me for you to be aborted.
1
9
you must be extremely enjoyable to be around if this is how you treat your own
Pride is a sin, Ava. Repent.
9
2 misrepresentations here, 1 the response "its a onion, i guess" while the other response is proclaiming something to be true without 2nd guess. along with the response of "all your opinions on food are invalid" as nobody stated that or anything similar in the original post
20h
156
"you know what doesn't exist, nothing" what a fundamentally retarded statement. nothing is literally existent
I believe God made the universe.
Evolutionists believe nothing made the universe.
We can have the conversation on whether God exists.
But you know what definitely doesn't exist? Nothing.
3
as i both possess the capacity for consciousness, and have past experiences that differentiate my life from others. no, but if i was still in utero id say. yes, more power to you brother
Can I abort you?
1
9
I never said thats what justified being able to kill a fetus in the womb, on top of that when asked "you rlly think this is a human" you can 1 not answer, 2 realize it can be other things, or 3 answer saying you don't know. what you shouldn't do is agree without knowledge.
If you're having a debate about human abortion and someone posts a picture of a fetus, it's not unreasonable to assume it's a human fetus. Most mammal fetuses look similar. So what? That doesn't say anything about the ethics of killing a human fetus in the womb.
2
where in the original post were they dishonest? genuinely the most retarded rebuttal today
"how is being dishonest not a good argument?"
3
no.. it would be like saying the fetus isn't a human cus it's a fetus. 😭
it’s a problem with perception not ontology. this is as dumb as saying “h20 isn’t water” because a scientist couldn’t eyeball the molecules
1
how is being unable to differentiate species a failed argument, it shows clearly how y'all don't know what you're talking abt, on top of feeling the smartest in the room allll the time
21h
thinking this is an argument is much dumber than respecting the sanctity of human life
5
414
"pre mature" means prior to full maturity, which is why it's labeled as a different kind of baby (birthed human) and this conversation had nothing to do with rights I was j telling you it's not a baby until birth
That’s not true, birth can happen at varying stages of development.
You’re saying that a premature 25 week baby has rights but a 37 week old fetus doesn’t?
11