🚨 **Behind Every Fraud, Corruption, & Collusion in #MMTLP: there are Real Lives That Are Shattered** 🚨 This video hits hard – showing the human faces drowning in the "machine" of Wall Street's halt. Families ruined, dreams crushed, all while regulators partied on. 1,130 days later, 65,000 victims demand answers. What's the share count? End the silence in 2026! @SEC_Enforcement @FINRA @realDonaldTrump @elonmusk – Watch & act! RT to expose the truth! 🇺🇸💔 #MMTLP #FINRAfraud #WhatIsTheShareCount #MMAT #InvestorJustice (Quoting @ArtburnDesigns's powerful video below 👇)

🚨 MMAT • NWBO • MULN 🚨 ⚖️ Stephen W. Tountas | Kasowitz LLP From the Meta Materials (MMAT) bankruptcy investigation to Northwest Biotherapeutics (NWBO) and Mullen Automotive (MULN), Tountas has been involved in some of the most closely watched securities and market-manipulation matters in the country. 🎯 Opposition has included: 
▪️ Citadel Securities
▪️ Virtu Financial
▪️ Canaccord Genuity
▪️ IMC
▪️ Clear Street
▪️ UBS
▪️ Other major market participants 🔍 Massive discovery.
📊 Complex trading data.
⚔️ High-stakes litigation.
📁 Millions of pages and records.
🏛️ Accountability begins with discovery 🦋 MMAT ➜ NWBO ➜ MULN 💥 Experience. Aggression. Results. 💥 ⚠️ Not legal advice. For entertainment and discussion purposes

⚠️WRECK THE NARRATIVE #4787: MMTLP XTD NARRATIVE: "There’s no proof of ANY overages. AT ALL. None." TRUTH/FACTS/RECEIPTS: ✅FINRA admits to 2.65 million open short interest after the halt: Based on FINRA’s subsequent regulatory efforts, FINRA estimates that there was an aggregate short interest position in MMTLP in accounts held at broker-dealers as of December 12 of approximately 2.65 million shares…” RECEIPT: finra.org/investors/insights… ✅ 15.4 million shares borrowed and sold short on last day of trading: @JohnnyTabacco confirms, 15.4 million shares were borrowed and sold short on 12/8/2022. TOTAL SALES from 12/8/2022 have been reported to be between 8.33 million and 13.7 million. The math ain't mathin'! RECEIPTS: x.com/JohnnyTabacco/status/1… stockinvest.us/stock-price/M… investing.com/equities/meta-… ✅Anson Funds requested 10 million shares from NBH/Roth after the halt: "Anson Funds contacted Roth Capital seeking to buy shares of Nextbridge. 10 million shares at $0.30 cents a share to cover their short position. This is all documented. Roth’s response was, wait a second, don’t you have a borrow? Anson’s response was 'no'." RECEIPT: marketfrauds.to/anson-funds-… ✅Financial Institutions contact NBH to buy shares halt: In a letter to FINRA's Robert Colby (Executive Vice President and Chief Legal Officer), NBH stated, "Per your request, the investment banking firm representing Next Bridge on our proposed S-1 has received several inbound calls from financial institutions needing to buy our shares to get their books in balance. One of the inquiries was of a size so large that I requested to be on a call with this group. From this call, I now have knowledge of an admitted shareholder imbalance from one single financial institution that is multiples more than 2.65mm shares. We continue to collect additional data regarding imbalances from multiple sources." RECEIPT: finra.org/sites/default/file… In a PR Newswire release, NBH explicitly referenced foreign firms: "Unfortunately, we believe this is a consequential blind spot in FINRA's data, because foreign firms have approached Next Bridge about procuring more than 2.65 million shares." RECEIPT: cdn.prod.website-files.com/6… ✅Tradestation admits shares are not backed by certificates: “Despite TradeStation’s best efforts, we have been unable to recall a portion of the lent-out shares because there is currently no market for the security. This means that we will not be able to honor some of our customers’ requests to register or record their ownership in book entry form with AST because the shares are not backed by physical certificates.” RECEIPT: See email image below. ✅Hilltop Securities admitted to @PeteSessions that they have a “big problem”. Hilltop Securities provides clearing services for Schwab. ✅Broker-dealer statement confirms shareholder has 7x certificate allotment: One shareholder in one broker holds 50,000 shares. Settlement/Clearing firm has 7,038 certificate allotment and clears for several brokerages. RECEIPT: See image below. ✅ FIF Brokers admit they can not deliver shares: "Because of prior FINRA trading halt, there are shares on loan that lending broker-dealers cannot recover." RECEIPT: x.com/JunkSavvy/status/20299… ✅Other damning evidence is confidential and has been forwarded to Administration Officials, select Congress members and Legal Counsel for Issuers and Bankruptcy. Can we FINALLY stop the 🐂💩and admit WE STILL HAVE A SETTLEMENT ISSUE??? MMTLP MMAT TRCH

🚨🚨NBH S1 is officially EFFECTIVE🚨🚨 1221 days and 11 amendments later… Effective! 🧨🧨🧨 #MMTLParmy $MMTLP $MMAT

And all we wanted to know was, What’s the share count of $mmtlp? #FINRAfraud #MMTLP mmtlp.com

🚨The question has always been What’s the share count? The answer is pending. #FINRAfraud #MMTLP #mmat mmtlp.com

RT @palikaras: 🚨Breaking news: 🦋 @Nasdaq just LOST its Motion to Quash. Read that again s l o w l y . . . The Bankruptcy Court in Nevad…

A quote from Senator Warren in today’s clarity act meeting “it doesn’t make any sense to have rules if nobody has to follow them“. Hilarious, ask the MMTLP shareholders what they think about that What’s the share count of $mmtlp? #FINRAfraud #MMTLP mmtlp.com

One of the biggest frauds known to Congress and the White House is the daily corruption on Wall Street. Look into why Cynthia West went to D.C. in the first place — she was fighting for transparency for the 65k #MMTLP shareholders. This case is frozen in time with a 1251-day U3 halt, exposing exactly how deep the problems go. Time for real answers, accountability, and justice for retail investors. mmtlp.com #MMTLPFiasco #FINRAfraud #WallStreetFraud #FraudTaskForce

THE SEC IS CORRUPT🚨 Next Bridge filed their original S-1 in 2023 and has had to make 10 amendments over time. The same company, while under Gary Gensler’s leadership, saw hedge funds reportedly reach out to the SEC asking them not to approve the S-1.. $MMTLP Is the SEC protecting hedge funds?

BREAKING 🚨 UNDER GARY GENSLER’S LEADERSHIP, THE SEC HAS BEEN CAUGHT COLLUDING WITH WALL STREET FOIA records reveal a broker trade group pushed the SEC to deny an S-1 due to unaccounted-for shares, known as naked shorts ⬇️ $MMTLP

🚨🚨FINRA FINES GO TO THEIR GENERAL FUND TO PAY SALARIES FINRA might need to dip into their general fund to get extra attorney's because their Motion to Quash in MMAT MMTLP was DENIED‼️ LOOKS LIKE THEIR IMMUNITY MIGHT NOT BE SO IMMUNE

BREAKING NEWS 🚨 Judge's Motions to Quash Decisions in April 20th 2026 Hearing... lets start with the facts Impotant Note to remember: this is a Preliminary Investigation Phase... (Disclaimer these are my notes, the pending final transcripts will reveal and support my findings, and I expect the community to accept, scrutinize or suggest edits if anything is innacurate) Based on the court ruling, here are the judge's decisions on each of the nine requests in FINRA's motion to quash: FINRA DENIED (Trustee Prevails): Request 1 - Short Interest Reporting Data: - Court will deny the motion to quash. - FINRA agreed this data could probably be produced - Judge noted discussion about duration (4 years vs. shorter period) needs clarification but denied the motion Request 2 - Trade Reporting Facility (TRF) Data: - Court will deny the motion to quash - Despite FINRA's claims of significant burden (25 million items), judge found it not "unduly burdensome" under Rule 45 - Trustee to bear costs of production - Judge emphasized need for good faith meet and confer on scope, timing, and cost-shifting Request 3 - Daily Short Sale Volume Report (Reg SHO) - Court will deny the motion to quash - Falls between short interest data (easier) and TRF data (more burdensome) - Consistent with prior ruling on TRF data GRANTED (FINRA Prevails) Requests 6 & 7 - FINRA Investigation Records and Public Communications - Court will grant the motion to quash - Judge found this seeks litigation-style discovery under Federal Rules, not preliminary Rule 2004 information - Rife with attorney-client privilege, work-product privilege, and investigative file privilege Would provide strategic advantage at PRELIMINARY stage (Note: again emphasis on the word -> "preliminary" hence no guarantees to block CAT for later...?) Request 8 - FINRA Electronically Stored Communications (Emails) - Court will grant the motion to quash - Falls on "document side" rather than "data side" of the dichotomy - Unduly burdensome and inappropriate under Rule 2004 - Seeks litigation-style discovery rather than preliminary information Request 9 - Order Quotations and Execution Records (CAT Data) - Court will grant the motion to quash - Judge found that information in Requests 1-3 effectively provides same information - Mirrors motion to compel-style discovery rather than preliminary investigation - Represents strategic advantage seeking under Rule 2004 There was an interesting section where the Judge then discussed CONDITIONAL/SEQUENCED items: - Requests 4 & 5 - Monthly and Weekly OTC Summary Report Data: Court will deny the motion to quash (conditionally) Judge noted these are "not necessarily critical" per trustee's own admission and proposed sequencing: - produce Requests 1-3 first, then reassess 4-5 - if computer-generated reports: deny motion to quash - If laborious/individualized: requires further detail to determine if burden is "undue" - Trustee to bear costs (they seems happy to do so) The judge ordered: 1. David Burnett to draft a proposed order reflecting the ruling for FINRA's review. 2. Good faith meet and confer on TRF data (Request 2) regarding scope, burden, timing, and cost-shifting 3. Parties to leave past disagreements behind and work cooperatively 4. One-paragraph summary of the 161-day data period requested for other Rule 2004 productions to be provided to court for clarity... My opinion is that once the judge gets this report he should have enough to not need any additional hearings and Citadel, Virtu and all others will get their answers too. did i miss anything? comment below⬇️ Next i will post my observations and interesting things I saw... and in my opinion what was the turning point in the hearing today that caught FINRA completely off guard and send their counsel in panic mode, judging from the body language!

Best for Last... The Turning Point in todays hearing MMAT Trustee vs FINRA motion to quash in my humble opinion was this: The judge cited TWO cases from his own independent research that informed his decision. This sent FINRA's lawer into "cannot compute" territory... and his entire body language i referenced in my earlier post manifested in front of our eyes. The two cases where: 1. Primary Case i believe our Judge quoted was In Re 204 Center LLC, Citation 634 B.R. 630 (Bankr. M.D. Fla. 2021), Judge Williamson... god rest his soul (can someone please look this one up on PACER?) Our Judge then stated that Judge Williamson surveyed the landscape of Rule 2004 scope and limits. Our judge read extensive quotes from this decision, particularly the conclusion at page 639 (i believe), which established that... Discovery under Rule 205, now called Rule 2004... was NOT intended to provide a party a STRATEGIC advantage in private litigation... Rule 205 was intended to provide the trustee generally new to the case with a VERY BROAD discovery device to aid in an efficient and FAST gathering of ALL the pertinent FACTS necessary in the effective administration of the estates... 2. The Secondary Case i believe was Millennium Holdings 2 LLC, 562 B.R. 614 Court: Bankruptcy Court, District of Delaware Year: 2016 Citation: 562 BR 614 This case also addressed similar questions about the limits on Rule 2004. deb.uscourts.gov/sites/deb/f… Note [I will need to further confirm the two cases once we get the transcripts...BIT it really does NOT even matter for the purposes of this initial discussion here... since the Judge's justification is all that matters... let me know below if you heard the Judge mention a different case.... and please do share!] ⬇️ How do these rulings impact positively future trustee investigations? 1. Broad Data Access Established - Trustees can now obtain market-wide data from regulators like FINRA and NASDAQ - Short interest data, TRF data, and trading volume data are fair game - This sets precedent that regulators CANNOT hide behind "burden" claims for basic data production Impact: Trustees can conduct comprehensive market manipulation investigations without being stonewalled 😎 2. Cost-Shifting Principle - The trustee bears the cost of production, removing the "undue burden" excuse from the likes of FINRA... - Judge adopted FINRA's own Rule 45 cost-shifting language (THANK YOU FINRA) Impact: Trustees with adequate funding (like MMAT's with litigation financing) can access data production for some additional $$$ 😎 3. Data vs. Documents Distinction - Judge clearly distinguished between "data" (generally producible) and "documents" (subject to privilege) - Data requests don't require document-by-document review Impact: Trustees can now DEMAND raw data exports without triggering full discovery obligations! 😎 4. Triangulation Principle Endorsed (big one) - Our Judge accepted the trustee's argument about needing data from multiple sources - Even if data overlaps, each party's data is relevant and must be produced Impact: Trustees can conduct multi-source investigations WITHOUT being told "go ask someone else first" 💪 FINAL THOUGHT I think this is a HISTORIC day. I am very appreciative of our fearless Trustee and legal teams, who have dared to face firms with unlimited resources, and our community who face every day, an army of echo chambers....already went to work tonight to claim victory... and why are they SO afraid of the trading data anyways? …But their narrative is no longer… turns out shouting in unison isn’t the same as being right, just louder about being wrong. 🤣😂

@annvandersteel @TheRobbCarter If the media and experts were to look at this objectively the Headline tomorrow would be something like this: "Unprecedented: Judge Denies FINRA Motion to Quash, Grants MMAT Trustee Rule 2004 Access to TRF Data" To the best of my knowledge (plz correct me if i am wrong) THIS is the FIRST and only time in FINRA's history where ANY company, person or organisation have been granted 2004 (broad) access to TRF data. Key Aspects of FINRA's TRF Data: 1. Reporting Mechanism: TRFs allow broker-dealers to report trades, typically within 10 SECONDS of execution, for equity securities. EVERY one... has so far been working off 5min data. to explain the significance of 10sec vs 5min in a market‑microstructure or litigation context: - Any path‑dependent metric (slippage, realized spread, adverse selection, queue dynamics, spoofing patterns) is fundamentally tied to HIGH‑frequency data. example1 : “The market was distorted over this 30‑minute interval; VWAP was pulled away from fundamentals” → 10‑sec window is often more than enough to show patterns. example 2: “This market maker placed and canceled orders in a way that spoofed the market at the millisecond level” → 10‑sec is not enough... you need order‑level data... seems like a dead end?? NO PROBLEM... The path: from 10 sec to ms is achievable for the Trustee. Step 1 – the 10‑second TRF data: - Show an anomaly or pattern that should not exist under normal trading. - Example: price/volume bursts, repeated ramps and fades, abnormal VWAP slippage, or patterns that line up suspiciously with specific counterparties or news windows. - This would be good cause / proportionality basis for the Trustee: something is off in a way that can be seen even at coarse resolution. Step 2 – Millisecond / order‑level data: - The trustee at this step would be compelled by their findings to argue that to understand how the anomaly happened, and who did what, you need the higher‑resolution record (full order book, message timestamps). - This is standard digital‑forensics logic: coarse timestamps show a suspicious interval; fine timestamps reconstruct the actual event sequence. So 10‑second data is the screening and prima facie evidence. Millisecond or order‑level data is the mechanism and attribution evidence. In 2004, the exchange / broker’s systems already recorded events with sub‑second resolution internally (for matching, risk, and audit), even if what was sold to clients later as historical data was coarser. Today, forensic practice recognizes that higher timestamp resolution is necessary to determine execution order and causality when multiple events occur inside a single second. Once the Trustee discovers that “something non‑random is happening” at 10‑second resolution, it becomes PROPORTIONATE to request the finer‑grained logs that can clarify sequence and intent. In other words: you are not asking for a fishing expedition; you are asking for the obvious next layer of the same record after you have located the suspicious windows. Oh no!... i predict some bad actors at this very moment are getting very sweaty... Active TRFs: There are three active TRFs operated in partnership with exchanges: 1. FINRA/Nasdaq TRF Carteret, 2. FINRA/Nasdaq TRF Chicago, and F 3. INRA/NYSE TRF. OTC Transparency Data: FINRA publishes OTC trading information on a delayed basis for ATS and member firms with reporting obligations. Daily Short Sale Volume Files: These files provide aggregated volume by security for short sale trades reported to a TRF, with daily files released for each facility by 6:00 PM ET. Did you know? Vendor Information: Organizations wanting real-time TRACE data must enter a Vendor Agreement with FINRA... aka the gag order? SO... as you can now appreciate based on the above... The Undisputable Winner is.... The Trustee Based on the court's rulings, the trustee (Mr Burnett) is the clear big winner on this day. Why the Trustee Won Granted Requests (3 out of 9): - Short interest reporting data - TRF (Trade Reporting Facility) data - the most critical and burdensome request - Daily short sale volume report data BUT ALSO...Conditionally Granted (2 out of 9): - OTC summary report data (Requests 4 & 5) - pending sequencing That's 5 out of 9 requests granted - the trustee got the core data it needed for its investigation... A reminder: that the Trustee has already 9 out of 9 wins on sending subpoenas, with every opposing party that tried to take the case away from Nevada (e.g. FINRA in DC, Nasdaq in NYC) all getting defeated again and again and returning back. Why the TRF Data Victory matters: - If you go and read the docket all responses from the start, this was the most hotly CONTESTED request. - FINRA claimed it would take weeks/months and cost hundreds of thousands of dollars. - The judge said: produce it anyway, and the trustee will pay for it. This is huge for the trustee's investigation. Judge's Tone - The judge was clearly frustrated with FINRA's approach and sympathetic to the trustee's position. Advantage - The judge rejected FINRA's broader claims about investigative privilege and work product for the data requests, finding those protections apply mainly to DOCUMENTS (Requests 6-8), not DATA (keep this in mind for future reference). The Judge made it clear he expects FINRA to cooperate in good faith going forward and warned against stall tactics FINRA's Losses: FINRA only won on Requests 6, 7, 8, and 9 (documents and CAT data) - the items it was most protective of anyway, and the trustee seems to not really care about it given the triangulation strategy they seem to be on... but the trustee's core investigative needs were GRANTED. Do you agree with my analysis and opinion above? Would love to hear your feedback, edits, corrections etc... In you made it this far (thank you for your patience)... next is the key turning point in today's call that caught FINRA by surprise... stand by. #MMAT #MMTLP

FINRA's counsel's reaction on the screen was really something to watch today... (at least to me) He was visibly distressed, holding his forehead, looking devastated at times and blank at others, not facing directly the screen like everyone else, one time his head was looking down so far that you could only see his hair (hands looked like texting someone profusely), fidgeting on his seat the whole time, head turned to 9/3 o'clock... seemed to not be alone in the room looking at them, and a lot of his narration/answers were rushed... with an unnatura/reading from an AI/live screen. This demeanor is important IMO as it will make sense when i explain the turning point of the hearing... In contrast on the Trustee side, 2 out of 3 lawyers came and left (Wes and Clay), very relaxed and very very confident, didnt push on the CAT because they got that thet came for... remember folks, they are triangulating. the TRF data plus Nasdaq plus marke makers etc etc... would you bet that the data will show exact consistency and no irregularities across multiple sources?? 🤣😂 I bet FINRA will be very unhappy after today: Even though FINRA won on Requests 6, 7, 8, 9, at the PRELIMINARY phase, the overall ruling was a disaster for FINRA because: ❌ FINRA Lost the Big One: TRF Data THIS was the MOST BURDENSOME request (25 MILLION items!!! - FINRA claimed it would take weeks/months and cost hundreds of thousands Judge said: "Produce it anyway, trustee will pay" 😂🤣 This is what FINRA REALLY cared about ❌ FINRA also Lost short interest and Reg SHO Data These were easier but still part of the market-wide data fishing expedition FINRA wanted to STOP ❌ The Judge's tone was against FINRA What I heard and saw today was the: - Judge repeatedly criticizing FINRA's approach - Judge essentially said the trustee was "reasonable" and FINRA wasn't cooperating - Judge essentially telling FINRA to work with the trustee or face consequences.

What regulators and politicians don’t want you to know - the problem is so big they can’t settle the trades. They allowed it to happen “…If nothing is wrong, why has the system refused transparency? If nothing is wrong, why has the system conspired to interfere in trade settlement? If nothing is wrong, why did Former Chairman Gensler and FINRA CEO Robert Cook lie and mislead Congress and the American People? If nothing is wrong, why have ALL of these participants fought discovery in 10 legal cases? ….There is a letter headed to your desk for signature…. The MMTLP Fiasco is BIGGER than Madoff, FTX and EEnron COMBINED!!! ….” - @JunkSavvy

The era of @SECGov "independence" without accountability is over. Under Executive Orders 14215 and 14147, the President has the authority to ensure federal agencies serve the people. After 12 months of meetings (Zoom & in-person) and a rigorous due diligence process with two Special Advisors to the President, the $MMTLP community reached a major milestone. As I previously stated via a post and on a space call, a formal letter has been submitted by his two advisors and is awaiting signature from @realDonaldTrump. President Trump, please sign the MMTLP letter! Exercise your executive authority and order Chairman @SECPaulSAtkins to conduct a full forensic audit of the outstanding share obligations held by all financial entities to determine the exact number of shares held, lent, and sold short, including all forms of derivatives or synthetic instruments that resulted in share exposure. If this administration stands for transparency, then the era of the SEC hiding behind "independence" to avoid accountability should be over. @JDVance @RobertKennedyJr @GenFlynn @annvandersteel @EagleEdMartin @laralogan @cvpayne @PeterTicktin

#mmtlparmy listen up Time to get to the bottom of What’s the share count of $mmtlp? #FINRAfraud #MMTLP mmtlp.com x.com/i/broadcasts/1pJdRbnnz…

Tomorrow at 10:00 CST, we will discuss the MMTLP FIASCO. We’ll walk through the public info, testimony, a signed Congressional Letter, FOIA’d emails, an Executive Order and more. Sustained pressure. @JunkSavvy @JustTheTweets17 @annvandersteel @MetaMan1111 @MMTLPCANADA @kshaughnessy2 @Giftsonglass @ggreenwald @PeterPfeifer18

How refreshing to hear a podcaster who just tells the actual story, no agenda, no slant, no BS. This is exactly what we need right now. Stop the insanity and hit play! 🔥 x.com/i/broadcasts/1wxWjapRV…"