I capture light in little black boxes

Joined July 2009
1,389 Photos and videos
Pinned Tweet
13 Jun 2019
"The language of the moment or, as it were, the language of the order in which we live, is the image. I felt that if I wanted to commune with the public, I should best do so through the language of image. It's a conscious embrace of a contradiction." -Godfrey Reggio
2
2
14
Josh Owens retweeted
20h
The Left is pushing for identification to use the internet while pushing for no identification to vote. Think about that.
283
9,994
50,273
385,939
Josh Owens retweeted
"American food ain't shit" *eats the worst examples of American food possible* "Wow this is actually the best food I've ever had in my life"
Jun 14
I just had an out of body experience
162
3,132
71,796
1,232,490
Josh Owens retweeted
Can we debunk this nonsense? Elon Musk was awarded (note: not given) cost-per-result contracts to perform a service for the US government. The total of those for SpaceX specifically is ~$22B, which includes repaid loans, state tax incentives, etc. The deal was simple: put stuff into LEO at or below a set cost. If SpaceX does it below the set cost, SpaceX keeps the difference. If it doesn’t, the company is responsible for the overrun. End result? SpaceX & Elon lowered the cost of getting 1 kg into LEO by 95-97% vs what NASA was paying previously. And for the record, every other company around at the time was offered the same opportunity to bid on the contract - Musk/SpaceX just took it. The handout narrative implies the taxpayer is the patron and SpaceX the dependent. The cost data shows the opposite: before SpaceX, NASA paid Russia’s Soyuz $80-86M per seat; SpaceX delivered at ~$55 million. SpaceX saved the US taxpayer $300M-$465M each year on that alone (the US sends 12-15 astronauts to space each year) On the lunar lander, NASA estimated SpaceX’s fixed-price bid saved $20B-$30B vs the Boeing-preferred cost-plus approach. So: SpaceX saved the US taxpayer more than the total value of contracts it earned on a single project, PLUS provided the US government with the requested services (put stuff in LEO) at the best possible price.
Elon Musk was given tens of billions in government contracts and tax breaks and was able to take a company that’s lost $41 billion and somehow become a “trillionaire.” You will pay social security your whole life and they’ll tell you it’s an “entitlement” when you try to collect
455
3,161
12,694
1,308,213
Josh Owens retweeted
Jun 14
elon could solve world hunger literally this second all he has to do is full stack dump all his shares, cause a stock market recession, wipe out trillions, delete tens of thousands of jobs, and then he'll be able to fund the federal government for about 18 minutes
447
1,786
26,224
445,244
Josh Owens retweeted
Simultaneous thunder and rainbows is completely symbolic of 2026 America

97
524
5,758
74,240
Josh Owens retweeted
SpaceX is a company whose mission is *axiomatically* the love of humanity To extend the light of consciousness The power of this kind of love is hard to quantify but clearly makes the impossible far more probable.
I love the incredible people of SpaceX beyond words
635
1,137
8,784
22,530,824
Josh Owens retweeted
DID I SERIOUSLY JUST GET THAT?!?!?! OH MY GOOOOD
62
961
15,217
155,652
Josh Owens retweeted
Haters: "This will never work, you would have to use big radiators!" SpaceX: *uses big radiators*
45
56
2,995
70,744
Josh Owens retweeted

5,735
14,362
106,791
21,747,381
Josh Owens retweeted
Oh my, my dunk of JerryRigs is going viral. Well, let's use this as a teaching moment. First, realize when people say "data centers in space" they aren't talking about lofting up giant Costco sized buildings. SpaceX and Starcloud are proposing satellites that each have the compute capacity of about one AI rack, or what the guy is pushing in the picture below. These individual sats won't be connected together in space to run large training jobs, they'll only be used for inference - answering people's questions, running agentic tasks, etc. So each satellite has relatively tractable power and cooling requirements. There will be a couple of largish solar panels attached to give it 24x7 cheap power (remember that you get like 5x more solar energy per panel in space than on Earth). And a smaller radiator that will radiate away waste heat into the vastness of space. Both the power and cooling technologies are simple, well tested and cost nothing to operate, unlike power and cooling on earth. In particular, cooling on earth requires extra power to run powerful water pumps to move fluid all over the place and then to dump the heat into a relatively hot atmosphere. Yes, space based cooling can only reject heat via radiative cooling, but it is doing it in the vacuum of space at -454 °F (-270 °C, 3 K) versus about 77 °F (25 °C, 298 K) on Earth, so that helps a lot. Point being that cooling in space has only a single upfront cost of building a passive radiator. But what about the overall cost, you ask? Well, think about all the things you don't need to build now. That rack the guy is pushing around weighs 1,400 pounds mostly because of all the metal required to support everything against Earth's gravity. Things can be built far more flimsy in space since they are in zero gravity. Also that rack has a bunch of power electronics and fans, neither of which are needed in space. Indeed, that entire building those racks sit in doesn't need to be built. All that fiber cabling isn't needed (lasers in space take the place, no need for cables). Giant utility transformers and a small army of step down transformers and battery packs don't need to be built. The land doesn't need to be bought. The permits don't need to be acquired. The supposedly huge amount of water used doesn't need to be provisioned (it's a tiny amount, but the detractors love to bring it up). There are in fact giant cost savings going into space. What about launch costs? That is small as well. Starship is fully reusable. The majority of launch costs are natural gas and liquified oxygen extracted from the air. That's it. Cheap access to space, really cheap I mean, is a huge unlock. I was initially shaking my head when I first heard about Elon's "crazy" idea of space based compute, but the more you look into it, it is far less crazy and more doable and practical. At least for SpaceX.
166
157
1,880
104,609
Josh Owens retweeted
Murderous migrants beheading innocent people in their home town is what’s making people angry, not “social media”!
16,666
93,574
584,062
54,031,509
Josh Owens retweeted
Fresh rockets rolling off the line. Factory is busier than ever. Our 100th Electron rocket is in this lineup.
74
400
4,158
248,497
Brits in England: “This is the worst world cup ever!” Germans driving a Mustang through Georgia with the top down to a game: “🎶AND I’M PROUD TO BE AN AMERICAN, WHERE AT LEAST I KNOW I’M FREE!!!🎶”
113
1,960
40,887
2,088,785
Josh Owens retweeted
The world’s largest operating steam locomotive has officially arrived in Western New York! 🚂 Union Pacific’s Big Boy No. 4014 is on a journey from coast to coast to celebrate America’s 250th anniversary 🇺🇸
8
45
330
18,643
Josh Owens retweeted
Captured by Anduril's network of 400 telescopes deployed around the globe: The second stage of the Falcon Heavy launch of ViaSat 3-F3 performing a routine thrust event. This produced a spiraled-shaped plume effect, a nominal part of operations for a successful launch of Viasat's latest satellite.
99
429
4,621
659,000
Josh Owens retweeted
I'm finally reading Dune. This quote, which is in the first few pages, hits hard: "Once men turned their thinking over to machines in the hope that this would set them free. But that only permitted other men with machines to enslave them."
722
21,527
121,528
2,119,789
Josh Owens retweeted
Antares Mark-0 has achieved initial criticality! ⚛️
126
223
1,687
409,477
Josh Owens retweeted
BREAKING: Antares has achieved initial criticality with Mark-0, its low-power nuclear reactor test unit at Idaho National Laboratory, marking the reactor’s first controlled, self-sustaining nuclear fission reaction
6
24
289
15,318
Josh Owens retweeted
No tire shops on the moon. These tires, built with strategic partner @Venturi Space, have been tested on 11 platforms, from NASA's Glenn Research Center to Switzerland. They go on FLIP, CLV-1, and every FLEX rover we build. The Moon doesn’t forgive untested assumptions. We test here so it works there.
38
115
800
48,925
Josh Owens retweeted
Jun 4
Next stop: space 🚀
7
58
637
33,992