This is the same government that still buys Russian oil bbc.co.uk/news/articles/ceqd…

A POLICE OFFICER SECRETLY EMAILED A LANDLORD TO GET A DISABLED TENANT EVICTED. CAMDEN COUNCIL HID EMAILS FROM THE OMBUDSMAN. THIS IS WHAT AN INSIDE JOB LOOKS LIKE. Someone messaged me on X a few weeks ago. His name is Ray Hanson @tenant49273533. He has disabilities. He sent me a pile of official documents and asked me to look at them. I did. Ray was living in a garden shed in Camden, North London. Not a converted one. Not a nice one. An illegal one. With rats. No heating. No hot water. Wires hanging out of a window. A toilet not fixed to the wall. A shower that did not work. And Camden Council knew about it since 2006. A formal Enforcement Notice was issued against the property that year. The notice said a building had been constructed in the back garden without planning permission and people were living in it. Illegal. Written down. Filed. Then Camden did what Camden apparently does best. Nothing. Fourteen years passed. Ray ended up living there. In July 2020 Camden's own Environmental Health Officer finally visited and condemned the place on the spot. No fixed heating. A broken skylight. Rat holes in the front garden. A shower that did not work. A toilet hanging off the wall. A sink falling away from the wall. Dangerous electrics with wires going out through an open window. A kitchen so bad it was declared unsafe. Camden's own document describes Ray as an extremely vulnerable tenant facing a very real risk of serious harm over winter. They banned the property from being used as a home. That was July 2020. Now remember that date. Because housing benefit records show £22,880 being paid directly to Ray's landlord in October 2021. Fifteen months after Camden condemned the property. With a weekly payment of £260 still running. Public money. Your taxes. Flowing to a landlord for accommodation that Camden's own officers had declared unfit and illegal. Nobody stopped it. Nobody joined the dots. Or maybe they just did not want to. Then it gets worse. In January 2021 a Metropolitan Police officer sent an email directly to Ray's landlord. Not to Ray. To the landlord. The email is on official Metropolitan Police headed paper with a verified collar number, station address, and direct phone numbers. He asked the landlord what his plans were for moving Ray out. He said that once Ray was gone all the problems would be solved. He told the landlord he had a vested interest in making that happen. He then referenced police powers to issue Community Protection Notices in the same email. A serving police officer emailing a private landlord asking when he planned to evict a disabled tenant living in a property that had already been condemned. When Ray complained about this email a Met officer accused him of fabricating it and threatened him with a criminal review. The email is on official police headed paper with a verified collar number. So who fabricated what exactly. While all this was happening Ray complained to the Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman, official case reference 20 003 347. During that investigation an internal Camden Council email surfaced. A senior manager wrote to colleagues including the officer who signed the Prohibition Order and asked whether there were any past emails they would not want uploaded to the Ombudsman because of the sensitivity of relationship building. A council manager asking his team which emails to hide from the official investigation. In writing. On a council email system. Ray took his case to court. The judge confirmed everything. The property was an illegal construction, unfit for human habitation, with rats, no heating, no hot water and dangerous electrics. Ray Hanson was awarded £58,567.80 in damages. He won. Then Camden Council went back to court and got him labelled a serial litigant. Because Ray had brought multiple claims about what happened to him, Camden's lawyers argued he was abusing the system. In November 2024 a General Civil Restraint Order was placed on him meaning he needed a judge's permission before making any further legal applications. So when the possession hearing came in May 2025 Ray could not defend himself. His application was dismissed before it was even heard. The court granted possession to the landlord and said Ray owed £27,320 in rent arrears. Just pause on those two numbers. Ray won £58,567.80 in damages from his landlord. Then a court said he owed that same landlord £27,320. Same man. Same landlord. Same condemned illegal shed. On 11 August 2025 police arrived at the property with taser guns and removed Ray Hanson by force. He was arrested and charged on the same day. He has been street homeless ever since. He is still homeless now. Still dealing with this. Still not resolved. A disabled man. Housed in an illegal shed that Camden flagged in 2006. Condemned by their own officer in 2020. Public money paid to the landlord for over a year after that. A police officer working with the landlord behind his back. Council staff asking which emails to hide from investigators. A court victory worth nearly sixty thousand pounds that changed nothing. A legal order used to silence him. Armed police. Arrest. The street. Camden called him the problem. And if you think this is an isolated case, last week @SkyNews reported that Camden Council is now facing legal action from families whose children were abused at a West Hampstead nursery for seven years while Camden looked the other way. Different victims. Same council. Same pattern. Issue a notice. Start a review. Avoid accountability. Move on. Ray Hanson is real. He is sleeping rough while Camden Council sits in its Town Hall on Judd Street. The documents are real. The court judgment is real. The Prohibition Order is real. The police email is real. The housing benefit payments are real. @Victoria_Rixon @MLorrM @johnmcdonnellMP @premnsikka @stevemiddi1 @nw_nicholas

The Thai Princess Bajrakitiyabha Mahidol has died, three years after her sudden collapse on Dec 14, 2022. Prof Bhakdi visited Thailand Dec 31, 2022. "She was perfectly well in the morning. This is very important" "After her 3rd shot, she collapsed" Not mycoplasma pneumonia.

🚨 The government made their own devices 100% invisible, so they can force yours to be 100% transparent. Did you know this? 🚨 They dodge the laws they force on you. On us. The people! Do not take this lightly. Every MP is exempt. Every Lord is exempt. Every elite civil servant is exempt. EVERY PARASITE IS EXEMPT! They force the laws on us. They legally shield themselves. Total public surveillance. Total state secrecy. Absolute parasite immunity. The well-funded, ‘professional’ campaigns wrap this up in polite, Ofcom-palatable jargon… we need to stop playing nice and call this brutal hypocrisy exactly what it is: a legal coup against our privacy. If you complain about the length of this post or a 8-minute video, you are part of the problem. No filters and no apologies. Wake up or get out of the way. 🚨 RULES FOR THEE, PRIVACY FOR ME: What you NEED to know! The UK has engineered a digital dictatorship. They demand total transparency from you, while securing absolute secrecy for themselves. This is not a theory. It is written directly into hard law. Here is the brutal, stripped-down truth of how the political parasites legally insulated themselves from the surveillance panopticon they are forcing onto the public. 1. The Divine Right of MPs The Law: Section 26, Investigatory Powers Act 2016 The Privilege: Intelligence agencies cannot touch an MP’s data without a personal, written veto from the Prime Minister. The Tyranny: Your life is subjected to automated bulk surveillance. Theirs is legally untouchable. 2. The Private Internet Loophole The Law: Schedule 1, Online Safety Act 2023 The Privilege: Official networks used by Ministers, Lords, and civil servants are explicitly exempt from client-side phone scanning. The Tyranny: Your personal WhatsApp must be stripped of privacy and screened. Their government-shielded apps are completely walled off. 3. The Unchecked Dictator Veto The Law: The "Henry VIII" Clauses in the Online Safety Act The Privilege: Ministers hold secondary legislative powers to alter and expand exemptions via Statutory Instruments. The Tyranny: If parasite official ever faces a surveillance clause, they can simply rewrite the law behind closed doors without a democratic vote. 4. The Weaponised Wilson Doctrine The Law: Codified Parliamentary Surveillance Protections The Privilege: The police and security services are completely banned from tracking, tapping, or snooping on politicians. The Tyranny: The very individuals voting to turn your smartphone into an informant are constitutionally protected from ever experiencing the consequences of their own votes. 💥 THE VERDICT This is the textbook definition of tyranny. A free society requires a transparent state and private citizens. The UK has completely inverted it. Your private thoughts, messages, and photos are treated as state property, while the parasites have declared their own devices sacred, unmonitored, and completely opaque. They know exactly how dangerous this technology is - which is precisely why they wrote themselves out of it. 📱 Step 1: The Secret Tunnel (The State VPN) When an MP, Minister, or elite civil servant works from home, they do not use standard family Wi-Fi. Their government laptops and phones are hard-coded to connect to a secure Government VPN (Virtual Private Network). 🔒 Step 2: The Legal Loophole Activates The second that VPN clicks on, every single text, photo, and WhatsApp message they send is sucked out of their house and routed through private servers owned by Parliament. Because their data is now flowing through a "public body network," it triggers Schedule 1 of the Online Safety Act. 🕵️‍♂️ Step 3: Complete Invisibility By law, this private state network is 100% exempt from the screening and scanning algorithms forced onto the public. Their devices instantly become legally invisible and untouchable to the state dragnet. 💥 The Naked Truth Your Home: Your personal Wi-Fi pushes your private messages into a public commercial pipeline where the government demands it be scanned and screened. Their Home: Their Wi-Fi instantly flips into a secure, state-shielded fortress. Location does not matter. The ruling class built a private internet for themselves, using a legal and technical bypass to completely dodge the digital panopticon they are forcing onto you. FYI: From 2020, when Civil Servants and MP’s worked from home, the Parliamentary Digital Service (PDS) mass-distributed pre-configured laptops, secure mobile devices, and hardware to the home addresses of every MP, Peer, and civil servant. They did not need to install private physical servers in individual houses because the devices themselves act as portable endpoints for the state's centralised servers… then, Government IT teams rapidly re-engineered their servers to handle the strain, massive scaling their corporate VPN capability. This allowed every single person in the state machine to plug their official laptop into their home Wi-Fi, click a button, and completely tunnel their traffic back into secure, centralized government servers. So, what shall we do folks!? New MNC (link in bio) campaign to begin VERY soon! But ideas welcome.

Come and be the one who gets this to 10,000

RT @SimonElmer2022: Under the UN policy of replacement immigration, any atrocity committed by a Muslim or foreigner against White people is…

If you, or someone you love, has cancer, B12 deficiency, kidney dialysis or a stent you need to know they they must now avoid ALL white flour. They also need to check wholemeal and even gluten free products which also contain folic acid. Sign this petition to stop it being mandated in flour: petition.parliament.uk/petit…

How a £1-an-acre trick is quietly handing Britain's industrial commons to AI companies, and why nobody has connected the dots until now. My new essay on the Anthropic/Teesside data centre deal, the Paris AI Summit walkout, and why the UK's "free zones" programme is quietly sabotaging any future return to the EU. Please subscribe, and support my research. open.substack.com/pub/europe… 1/8

1/ THE TEESSIDE DEAL: Two businessmen got the right to buy public land for £1/acre in 2021. The public body that owns it spent £450m cleaning it up. This month, they sell 222 acres to Anthropic for £222m. That's a roughly 1,000x markup, captured almost entirely by two men.

When Grok is cornered in a debate, it just goes silent. It had to go silent when trying to defend adding folic acid to flour. Sign the petition to stop this: petition.parliament.uk/petit…

My dear Stephen, How terribly delightful to see you once again waddling into the arena, that gloriously bald dome of yours catching the light like a freshly polished egg. The son of Neil Kinnock, the man who turned Labour into an unelectable laughing stock, still desperately clinging to daddy's dusty legacy like a balding, entitled little limpet who never learned to stand on his own two feet. You claim "we're delivering" 2.5 million dentist appointments. Bless your heart. You are not delivering anything. You are announcing. You are promising. You are counting chickens that will not hatch for a decade while your constituents pull their own teeth out with pliers today. Dental school places? Future promises. The "biggest sustained increase since 2007"? Labour's own 2007 baseline, Stephen. How wonderfully convenient. The British Dental Association calls your numbers fantasy. Practices are closing. Dentists are leaving the NHS. Your "reforming dental contract" is a press release, not a policy. By the time your promised dentists graduate, there will be no NHS dentistry left to save. But do carry on posting, pet. Eighty-five likes. Forty-five retweets. The nation is simply overwhelmed by your delivery.

Here is the reality behind the claim of the amazing new breast cancer genetic test...

I think Tracey in Hereford is over the target. It’s happening in Australia too.

RT @EuropeanPowell: REMEMBER: FREE ZONES ARE FRAGILE The enterprise zone network looks formidable, billions in investment, cross-party supp…

Don't forget to consult your GP before you next eat a sandwich, croissant, pie etc. That's government advice? Have they thought this through?

The petition to stop folic acid entering our flour is on 7,337 votes after three days. Please keep sharing with friends and family. If we kept up the current rate we could reach the target by the end of July. petition.parliament.uk/petit…

Bloody hell, I’ve been digging more into the government definition of 'Crisis' a bit more So... an unelected regulator is now operating within government where the meaning of “crisis” has become very stretched. The Cabinet Office Amber Book says an emergency under the Civil Contingencies Act covers serious damage to human welfare, the environment or UK security. (fair enough) But then it has added ... “For the purposes of this guidance, the terms emergency and crisis are used interchangeably.”... INTERCHANGEABLY? It also says an emergency/crisis can include situations that have not yet been harmful but have the potential to be (they do not define 'harmful' This guidance has not been voted for or debated So let me explain why thats so important. it means that almost any situation the government believes could become a problem can now be treated as a 'crisis'. And under that broad language, Ofcom has been able to write to platforms about civil unrest, crisis situations and how they will need to beef up moderation, it isnt just about removing illegal content. Anything could become a “crisis”, no one voted for the widening of the definition and no one had the opportunity to, because thats how government by guidance works.... hoping you won't even notice.

RT @SimonElmer2022: Without it having been officially declared, I believe the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland is now,…

A recent court case not guilty by jury despite the judges best efforts for a guilty verdict. This case, result on 8/6/26 At Bristol Crown Court is why jury trials must NEVER be removed. The judge in this case has been reported to Avon and Somerset Police for Perverting the course of justice and misconduct in public office. A crime number has been issued and the complainant Dale Vincent has sent a strong letter to the Chief Constable Sarah Crew outlining his expectations and their legal and statutory obligations to investigate these crimes, witnessed by the forces own Police Inspector present on two days of the five day trial. Without the jury Dale would be in prison today. That’s how corrupt this system is. This was no ordinary case. An alleged assault on an emergency worker, a police officer, but the jury did not believe the assault happened. This was Dale making a citizens arrest of a police officer for failing to close a vaccine centre administering the bio weapon jabs for covid. Significant evidence from experts was available to the police but they point blank refused to look at it, or to speak to @DrAseemMalhotra who was waiting and available on the phone to speak to the police and the NHS director at the centre. He would have advised them to stop the vaccines with credible and evidenced reasons why. The judge refused to allow Dr Malhotra’s evidence to be put to the jury or allow him to be called as a witness. For 18 months it was agreed my statement was permitted and I was lined up to give evidence in support of Dale. My statement 14 pages is damning. On day three of the trial my evidence was refused to be shown or me as a witness allowed to give evidence. The judge did not want our evidence on the public record or to be seen by a jury. Dale’s McKenzie friend was then dismissed and not allowed into the court, no reason given. Dale has protected characteristics in law, special measures were in place but the judge left Dale abandoned and put a Police Inspector there instead. The public gallery was closed too. This trial, the judges behaviour and the rightful verdict of not guilty should be front page news to expose the judiciary and prove jury trials MUST REMAIN. The X post is attached. My statement for anyone wanting to see why I couldn’t give evidence or have my statement scrutinised is here too. I’m sure if you read it you’ll understand why the jury couldn’t hear my evidence. ethicalapproach.co.uk/sexton… x.com/xpcbirmingham/status/2…

The most revealing detail in the Chagos row isn’t just Starmer’s obsession with getting the deal done – it’s the way the Government pulled its own bill, ducked the King’s Speech and hoped the whole thing would quietly die when the session clock expired. Now peers have bounced back with a sovereignty protection bill that doesn’t just stop this giveaway, but nails down a principle: never again can a Prime Minister dispose of British territory without Parliament, without transparency and without the consent of those whose homeland is at stake. In January, the Lords inflicted four defeats on the Government over Chagos, demanding a referendum, full costings and parliamentary control over payments – and ministers still tried to carry on as if a few tweaks would make the outrage go away. The truth is, they know a straight‑up public argument on this would destroy them: voters will not understand why, in an era of squeezed budgets, Labour finds billions for a sovereignty surrender but no money to honour the Chagossians’ right to return. So they smear critics, suppress scrutiny, and hope NGOs and civil service briefings can shame MPs into line – until someone in the Lords finally turns round and says: put it to a vote of the people you displaced. This isn’t just a row about some dots on a map in the Indian Ocean – it’s a test of whether any future government can still cut sovereignty deals in the dark, or whether the triple lock becomes the new democratic firewall they cannot cross.