anti-legacy-ip cyber-bully, pro-ipv6 shitposting. proud inductee to the @ipv6cabal. shaming: twitter.com/noIPv6/status/14โ€ฆ

Joined January 2019
3,230 Photos and videos
pro tip: anyone who thinks legacy ip could have been replaced in a less impactful manner than ipv6, please understand that people reinvent this idea frequently, & it has the exact same flaws every time. ipv6 isnโ€™t perfect - far from it! - but there was no โ€œeasier alternativeโ€.
22
27
187
๐Ÿ‘ป spooky ipv6-only networking ๐Ÿ‘ป retweeted
Replying to @szarka @noIPv6
10 years ago, i would say ok, fair, but now it's time to complain i think, considering that your teaching is impacted by this now it's more likely that somebody in the IT department said ONLY OVER MY DEAD BODY and others surrendered, than "just not having the resources"
1
1
4
790
๐Ÿ‘ป spooky ipv6-only networking ๐Ÿ‘ป retweeted
Did I really want to read these university slides today? It's 30 years since CIDR and 25 years since IPv6. There are ~60 slides about IPv4 and NAT and then 6 slides about IPv6 โ€ฆ why can't they teach IPv6 first? ๐Ÿ˜ญ (cc @noIPv6)
2
3
13
1,015
๐Ÿ‘ป spooky ipv6-only networking ๐Ÿ‘ป retweeted
Replying to @haschm
See, IPv6 propaganda on electric cars! @noIPv6
2
8
866
saw a post elsewhere referencing a transparent, intellectually dishonest attempt by the owner of this site to influence politics, with the caption โ€œanyone still active on twitter needs to take a long hard look at themselvesโ€ yea canโ€™t argue w/ that ๐Ÿ˜’
1
5
1,004
boosting for reach/visibility: "Congratulations to #Microsoft for the bold technology leader decision to launch a privacy VPN product in 2024 with no #IPv6 support. ๐Ÿ˜‘ I'm not surprised, just disappointed." cc @microsoft @jepaynemsft @phillip_misner @yo_yo_yo_jbo @ravivtamir
4
8
46
3,169
someone reminded me i didnโ€™t link (if i even can ๐Ÿค”๐Ÿค) mspsocial.net/@jima/11240006โ€ฆ

1
3
765
๐Ÿ‘ป spooky ipv6-only networking ๐Ÿ‘ป retweeted
7 May 2024
Replying to @DaryllSwer @noIPv6
Probably kidnapped by the ipv4 mafia
1
1
10
597
๐Ÿ‘ป spooky ipv6-only networking ๐Ÿ‘ป retweeted
๐Ÿ™Œ๐Ÿฝ CONGRATULATIONS ********************************** For successfully completing a course to upraise your #IPv6 skills ๐ŸŽ“ Who Alick Munthali ๐Ÿ›ณ Course IPv6 Foundations Join in and learn for free at academy.afrinic.net.

1
4
917
๐Ÿ‘ป spooky ipv6-only networking ๐Ÿ‘ป retweeted
Replying to @panchajanya0608
Although we do not officially support IPv6 at the moment, we're working towards providing support in the upcoming period, and we're already testing IPv6 on some of our paid servers. You can find more details at reddit.com/r/ProtonVPN/commeโ€ฆ
1
1
11
826
๐Ÿ‘ป spooky ipv6-only networking ๐Ÿ‘ป retweeted
Enable #IPv6 virtual address assignment for Absolute Secure Access clients (formerly NetMotion). @absolutecorp #mobility #security #secureaccess rmhci.co/4ah0nhj

1
4
755
๐Ÿคก
10
672
๐Ÿ‘ป spooky ipv6-only networking ๐Ÿ‘ป retweeted
14 Mar 2024
Replying to @HPE
@HPE @Aruba Did you really mean to use a /24 #IPv6 prefix length in your ArubaOS-CX docs? #IPv4Thinking techhub.hpe.com/eginfolib/Arโ€ฆ
1
5
10
1,446
๐Ÿ‘ป spooky ipv6-only networking ๐Ÿ‘ป retweeted
Measuring NAT64 Usage with RIPE Atlas ; NAT64 is a kind of Network Address Translation that translates IPv6 packets to IPv4 - Blog post RIPE Labs #Network #IPv6 buff.ly/3TuVmfn

3
1
636
okay @google could you please stop serially firing the ppl who maintain google.com/intl/en/ipv6/statโ€ฆ ? breaking it twice in a quarter is a bit embarrassing ๐Ÿ˜‘

4
6
45
3,475
(& no i donโ€™t know if iโ€™m back or not, weโ€™ll see how things go ๐Ÿ˜’)
4
1
16
944
๐Ÿ‘ป spooky ipv6-only networking ๐Ÿ‘ป retweeted
5 Mar 2024
Shopify stores are all available over IPv6 and HTTP/3 now
29
49
845
117,565
๐Ÿ‘ป spooky ipv6-only networking ๐Ÿ‘ป retweeted
3
3
17
2,095
๐Ÿ‘ป spooky ipv6-only networking ๐Ÿ‘ป retweeted
Replying to @noIPv6
We do not have an ETA on the rollout of iPv6.
1
1
1
843
๐Ÿ‘ป spooky ipv6-only networking ๐Ÿ‘ป retweeted
Maybe releasing 240/4 for general consumption is the thing that will drive #IPv6 adoption by completely wrecking #IPv4 interoperability: โ€œI canโ€™t reach your network, are you on 240/4? Yes? Lets do v6 insteadโ€
4
4
14
3,000