The Department of Economics at the New School for Social Research has just issued a statement on the New School's decision to layoff dozens of staff and faculty colleagues, including our own colleague and friend, Professor Sanjay Reddy.
Analysis from the Chicago Fed, which may or may not be the first time a Federal Reserve bank research product has used the word "vibes" chicagofed.org/publications/…
Maybe early-career college-grad unemployment is being driven by WFH, not AI. "Employers may not want to hire fresh graduates onto distributed teams because it is more difficult to teach them the requisite skills from afar."
Large productivity gains from AI don't lead to equally big gains in software.
40%/ 140%/ 180% commits from autocomplete/interactive/autonomous agents but only 50%/ 30% projects/releases
And does this new software get used by consumers? Not really. It's invisible/irrelevant.
Unexpected finding: Chatting with LLMs in the midst of classic economic decision tasks (portfolio allocation, dictator game, etc) tended to depolarize people -- they moved *away* from their initial decisions. This despite AI sycophantically echoing users. papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.…
Narrative violation: Gen Z has the highest consumer confidence. Gen X and Boomers are the pessimists.
I do feel that undercuts many of the material explanations for the vibecession, insofar as uniquely awful economic conditions for young people are a main driving force.
BUT when we control for WFH exposure, this effect all but disappears in our baseline results. This is NOT the case with WFH exposure, which is a robust predictor of the fall in junior-share of hiring with or without AI
Is GenAI causing the relative decline in early-career hiring? Our latest research finds that these effects may be conflated with another important driver: the rise of WFH arrangements (1/N)
1/ New piece out with the incredible @econJaredB. We dig into what's been on everybody's mind — affordability, consumer sentiment, and whether we've cracked the mystery of the vibes puzzle: siepr.stanford.edu/publicati…
The US tech sector continues losing jobs—overall, employment decreased by 10k last month and is down 53k over the last year
That's not as bad as the worst of the 2024 tech-cession, but extremely bad compared to the 2022 boom or even pre-2020 norms