Almost every sentence in this post is wrong.
“California’s universal mail-in ballots with no reliable post-election audits…”
California absolutely conducts post-election audits. By law, counties perform public manual tallies, and many counties conduct risk-limiting audits that compare paper ballots to reported results.
“lack basic verification”
California verifies voter registration, compares vote-by-mail signatures against signatures on file, contacts voters when signatures are missing or don’t match, allows voters to cure those issues, checks provisional ballots, reconciles ballot totals, and conducts a canvass before certification.
In fact, one of the biggest complaints people have about California is that counting takes too long. The reason it takes longer is because all of that verification is happening before certification.
“implement voter ID”
California already verifies voter identity. It simply does so through voter registration records, signature verification, and ballot validation procedures rather than requiring every voter to present photo ID at the polling place.
“paper trails”
California already uses paper ballots. That’s what makes recounts, manual tallies, and risk-limiting audits possible.
“same-day counting”
California accepts vote-by-mail ballots postmarked by Election Day and spends weeks verifying signatures, processing provisional ballots, curing ballot defects, reconciling records, and conducting the official canvass. The goal is accuracy, not speed.
“full transparency”
The process is already transparent. Ballot processing, signature verification, ballot handling, canvassing, and post-election audits are open to observers. Republican and Democratic observers routinely watch the process. Counting centers are under video surveillance, and many counties provide live video feeds so the public can watch ballot processing and counting activities in real time.
So your post is demanding audits California already performs, paper trails California already has, verification procedures California already uses, and transparency measures that already exist.
The only thing on that list California does not universally require is photo ID at the polling place. Everything else is largely a criticism of procedures that are already in place.