Bringing real authority to agents which can work dynamically at @Moi_tech. Ex - @BimaBTC, @ProtocolLabs, @Filecoin, @0xPolygon

Joined October 2018
886 Photos and videos
Pinned Tweet
Jun 16
Just approved delegated Authority to my agent to work on my behalf with a set of rule through @MOI_Tech. Now looking to change set of of rule based on some analysis on realtime basis to get great result before declining the approval by tomorrow.
10
14
240
Looking forward to share more about @MOI_Tech
1
11
Jun 16
Telegram is not working in India. Government should comes up with proper norms. Because of mismanagement people will not able to use telegram while business drive through it.
India’s IT ministry banned Telegram for one week because some users shared leaked exam questions. This punishes 150M ordinary Telegram users in India — not the insiders who leaked the exam materials. And the ban hasn't stopped anything. The leaks just moved to other apps.
1
3
183
Piyush retweeted
Jun 16
Just approved delegated Authority to my agent to work on my behalf with a set of rule through @MOI_Tech. Now looking to change set of of rule based on some analysis on realtime basis to get great result before declining the approval by tomorrow.
10
14
240
Piyush retweeted
Jun 16
1/ The most trusted person in your life can't spend money from your bank account without your permission. Your AI agent can. That's the strange reality of the emerging agent economy. As agents begin negotiating contracts, moving capital, and operating systems on our behalf, we're granting them more practical authority than the most trusted humans in our lives. The question isn't whether agents will become powerful. The question is: How do we ensure that authority remains connected to the person it belongs to? That's the challenge nobody is talking about. Participants decide. Agents execute. The network enforces ⚡ → moi.technology
1
3
4
122
Piyush retweeted
Jun 11
New world order for authority with @MOI_Tech , whenever the agent is created, authority with participant centricity can be provided to all of them and can be used on any blockchain be it @ethereum, @base, @solana etc.
Jun 11
Build agents on any stack. Authority flows from participants. MOI makes it verifiable for all.
3
6
13
344
Jun 11
New world order for authority with @MOI_Tech , whenever the agent is created, authority with participant centricity can be provided to all of them and can be used on any blockchain be it @ethereum, @base, @solana etc.
Jun 11
Build agents on any stack. Authority flows from participants. MOI makes it verifiable for all.
3
6
13
344
Jun 15
The M in mango is @MOI_Tech, the S is @SpaceX. One cracked, other is looking for great high
1
2
41
Piyush retweeted
Jun 12
Let’s bring delegated authority to these agents right to the participant level.
Meet Coinbase for Agents. Give your agent its own account to: → Execute trades & manage your portfolio → Run autonomously under guardrails → Pay for data & research tools via x402 (coming next week) Agentic finance is here, and it's powered by Coinbase.
3
1
3
232
Piyush retweeted
Jun 12
This is what after effect of AI only, lol. Human with ai is better where it can give delegated authority to agents with participant centric appraoch.
the CEO of a $1 trillion company has 1 direct report
2
1
4
198
Piyush retweeted
Jun 11
Open for recommendation for guests we should invite. #AI #agent #Autonomousagent
Jun 11
🚨MOI Community Call #11 Building What Comes Next Join us for ecosystem updates, builder insights, community initiatives and a special guest session. 🗓️ 19 June 2026 ⏰ 8 PM IST More details soon. Stay tuned. RSVP Today: luma.com/yl774j3t #MOI #Web3 #AI #ContextualCompute
1
1
7
207
Piyush retweeted
Jun 11
Without delegated authority with participant centric, this is what it looks like for agents.
what happens when you stop treating Claude Fable like a chatbot and just let it run.
1
1
4
115
Jun 10
We are looking to bring authority to agents everywhere - @Arshasays is going to be in ama of DAC where agents can be quantum secure but we will work on bringing delegated authority there on @dac_chain
Quantum computing is moving faster than the encryption protecting your money. How worried should we actually be? Hosted by @esteemedbuilds, with @davide___costa, Artur of DAC, @amateo, and @arshasays. Tomorrow, 2 PM UTC, turn on 🔔
1
8
148
Piyush retweeted
Apr 25
Recently @a16zcrypto published article about "The missing infrastructure for AI agents: 5 ways blockchains can help" where great contributor were there including @cc_crowley, @ccatalini, @ahall_research, @liz_harkavy, @nlevine19, and @psneville. And Guess What : we had build this, now looking to make it live soon - @MOI_Tech - The Participant Layer of Internet, which can solve this and beyond while catering enterprises, web2 apps and web3 dapps. Authority lives independently at the participant level. so you don’t embed it into every agent, you keep it separate, and you propagate it only when you deliberately choose to. This creates clean, controllable, and revocable control without baking permissions into every AI instance. Our Moat: Participant-Level State Management We own the participant layer. - The source of truth for “who can do what” sits with the participant, not the agent. - When the participant’s state is set to “participant,” every downstream decision (even by agents) must resolve against that single source. - Agents themselves remain completely stateless, they carry no persistent authority. Why This Matters (The Permission Problem Solved) If every agent simply “holds an API key,” you have a nightmare: - How do you give or revoke permission dynamically? - How do you enforce it across thousands of interactions without constant re-authorization? Our model flips it: - Agents need authority, they don’t own it. -Authority lives at the interaction level, issued fresh from the participant’s state on every call. - Revocation is instant and global: change the participant state once → agents lose access immediately. No chasing down API keys. Result: True Distributed Authority - Participant = Stateful (owns the rules) - Agent = Stateless (executes only what it’s handed) - Authority = Dynamically granted per interaction This gives real safety and trust to AI agents. Target Use Cases - Safe Pool of AI agents (secure, auditable multi-agent environments) - AI Governance frameworks (enterprise-grade control and compliance) - Enterprise Data Consent & KYC (solve the consent-entity problem cleanly, participants explicitly grant/revoke consent at source, KYC-compliant by design)
8
8
21
4,117
Piyush retweeted
Jun 10
Standing with crypto is always there. Hope we got the right folks behind this attack and things get sorted for users. As we stand we crypto community. Hope @Humanityprot community will get the justice. While we at @MOI_Tech believe identity can't bring trust for agents alone. Thats why we are bringing authority layer where through participant centric approach we can bring existence = identity authority memory (context). We want authority to agents part of 4th amendment, like that you can say with participant centric.
While we work on a recovery plan for everyone affected, we want you to see exactly what we see. We’ve set up a live tracker of the exploiter’s addresses and downstream transfers so our community can follow the situation in real time: transparency.humanity.org/
1
1
3
212