All mutations of socialism are poison : (Class, Race, Nation, Identity). Nations can be built without it. Stay free.

Joined July 2021
4,628 Photos and videos
Pinned Tweet
RACIAL Socialism put my dad in a german work camp. CLASS Socialism drove his home country to chaos. IDENTITY Socialism eventually divided his new country. - I believe people best help people, not socialism. đŸ—œ
8
16
56
Det Ă€r fantastiskt hur flirtandet med symbolen för sharialagar blivit ett meme för ”frihet”. Den ”progressiva” socialismens strategi att krossa alla kategorier för att ”utjĂ€mna”, underminerar den egna kategorin och kommer helt att lösas upp av Islam. Tick â˜Ș Tack⏳Tick 💀..T
Godmorgon! Man fÄr passa pÄ att ha sin sjal pÄ huvudet innan SD förbjuder det! Om borgerliga sidan vinner valet och SD fÄr ministerposter i en kommande regering kan detta jag gör nu, Äker tÄg med ett tygstycke pÄ huvudet, vara straffbart.
11
Re. Mi. Gra. Tion.

2
Presque Beignet retweeted
We Asked AI To Simulate What Would Happen If AOC Was Forced To Learn Economics Made with @grok.
1,065
3,525
28,699
23,384,089
Bryt förtrollningen ! Bryd fortryllelsen ! Break the spell !

1
29
TV övertygar dig INTE med argument utan visar genom manusförfattarens behandling av rollfigurerna vad som Ă€r ”rĂ€tt och fel”. Straff till de ”elaka”. Belöning till de ”snĂ€lla”. 👇 Inte bara ett par moralkakor, men en hel tĂ„rta med slemmig identitetsmarxism! x.com/hothingsgirlsay/status


16
Scandinavian countries are being eroded slowly. 2026 is election year in both đŸ‡©đŸ‡° & 🇾đŸ‡Ș. — The danes have AGAIN handed over their country to pure socialists. — Swedish state media use all their power to push for the same. If you are a swede, LISTEN 👇👇👇 Carrier of fire!!đŸ”„
CARRIER OF FIRE When you speak your unfiltered mind about the governments destroying our countries, the loyal foot soldiers show up. Then you’re hateful. Then you’re creating division. All because you declare that you will put everything into the resistance their time in power so desperately deserves. So let me ask: Who opened the borders against the will of the people? Who handed our sovereignty to unelected bureaucrats in Brussels that no one ever voted for? Who calls every concerned citizen a racist? Who divides the population into the obedient and the suspicious? Who labels all criticism as hate, because it’s easier than answering it If anyone has created hate and division, it’s them. Arrogance of power, constantly wrapped in moral concern, which has NOTHING to do with leadership, but everything to do with control. And the word “hateful”? It’s not a description. It’s a weapon. Used to silence anyone who won’t fall in line. But hate is an energy, and energy cannot be hidden. So look closely. What you see here is not hate. It’s a woman who has been unfiltered her whole life. Direct and uncompromising when it comes to calling out the bllsht
 for the country and the Western world she loves. I’m not a hater. I’m a carrier of fire. You call it hate, but ONLY because you’ve never seen love fight. Now you have.â€ïžâ€đŸ”„âœïžđŸȘœ
1
20
LĂ€gg ner @svt

12
Ska vĂ„rden fettsuga anorektiker om dom vill det? —En bra frĂ„ga man kan bĂ€ra med sig. Ping @AgnesWold

13
1 (3) Swedish Ericsson (owned by the 200 year old Wallenberg family) invented Bluetooth in the ‘90s but made it royalty-free — so, they don’t get paid when your iPhone connects to AirPods, but..
.@Apple Planned Obsolescence The “Truth” about why the headphone jack was removed. I wonder how much damage has been done to the human brain with bluetooth tech?
1
1
90
2 (3) Faster 4G and 5G networks mean people stream, game, and use their phones way more — which naturally makes them buy more Bluetooth earbuds, speakers, and smartwatches. ..
1
1
31
3 (3) More Bluetooth devices equals more demand for cellular networks. That’s where Ericsson makes its money — through 4G and 5G patent deals with companies like Apple. Wallenberg is something to dig into. Read about the golden phone for the Russian Tsar.. or the Dulles Brothers
1
69
PĂ„ svenska sĂ€ger mĂ„nga ”man” nĂ€r dom pratar om sig sjĂ€lva. LĂ€gg mĂ€rke till hur högst personliga, kanske unika upplevelser — som rent av ingen haft — trubbas av via det kollektiva ”man”: ”NĂ€, man blir ju lite glad, nĂ€r man sĂ€tter foten pĂ„ mĂ„nen”. Sluta med det.👇
A Russian psychologist spent 10 years proving that the act of talking to yourself out loud is one of the most powerful cognitive tools the human brain has, and almost nobody outside his field has read the work. His name was Lev Vygotsky. He worked in Moscow in the 1920s and died of tuberculosis in 1934 at the age of 37. He had no laboratory, no funding, almost no English readers, and a body of work that the Soviet government suppressed for two decades after he died. He produced the foundational theory of how human cognition actually develops, and the central piece of that theory was a behavior almost every adult is faintly embarrassed about. Vygotsky noticed that young children talk to themselves constantly. They narrate their own actions, they argue with imaginary opponents, they instruct themselves through tasks out loud. The dominant theory at the time, from the Swiss psychologist Jean Piaget, said this was a sign of cognitive immaturity that children would eventually grow out of as they learned to think properly. Vygotsky said the exact opposite. He argued that this self-directed speech was the most important cognitive event in the entire developmental window, because it was the moment a child first started to use language as a tool to control their own mind. The child was not failing to think. The child was learning how to think by externalizing the process and listening to themselves do it. He predicted that as children matured, this out-loud self-talk would not disappear. It would go underground. It would become silent inner speech, which is the running monologue every adult has inside their own head for the rest of their life. The voice you hear when you read this sentence is the direct descendant of a four-year-old narrating their own block tower. For 50 years almost nobody outside Russia had access to his work, and the few researchers who did pick it up could not get funding to test it. Then in the early 2000s the experiments finally started to pile up, and what they found was that Vygotsky had been right about something even more important than he knew. The first major study came from Gary Lupyan at the University of Wisconsin and Daniel Swingley at the University of Pennsylvania in 2012. They ran a simple visual search experiment. Participants were shown 20 images at once and asked to find a specific object, like a banana or a chair. In one condition they searched silently. In the other condition they were told to say the name of the object out loud to themselves while looking for it. The participants who spoke the target name out loud found the object significantly faster, with higher accuracy, than the participants who searched in silence. The effect was strongest when the spoken word matched a familiar object the brain already had a strong category for. Saying the word out loud literally tuned the visual system to detect that thing better. The researchers called it the label feedback effect, and the implication was that the act of vocalizing a goal physically changes how the brain processes the world while pursuing it. The second major study came out of the University of Michigan and Michigan State in 2017. The lead researchers were Ethan Kross and Jason Moser, and they used both EEG and fMRI to record what happens inside the brain when people talk to themselves while emotionally upset. They asked participants to recall painful autobiographical memories and reflect on them in two different ways. Some used the first person, saying things like "why am I feeling this way." Others used the third person, referring to themselves by their own name, saying things like "why is John feeling this way." The brain scans showed that the simple act of switching from first person to third person, even silently, decreased activity in the medial prefrontal cortex, the region responsible for rumination and self-referential pain. Within a single second of using their own name instead of the word I, participants showed measurably lower emotional reactivity. The shift required no extra cognitive effort. It cost the brain nothing. And it worked. Kross described the mechanism in his interviews. Talking to yourself by name creates a small amount of psychological distance from your own experience. Your brain processes the situation more like a problem belonging to someone else, which means it can analyze it instead of drowning in it. What Vygotsky had intuited in 1934 turned out to be even more powerful than the developmental theory he built it into. The voice you use to talk to yourself is not background noise. It is one of the most precise cognitive tools the brain has, and you can change how it works just by changing the pronoun you use. People who talk through problems out loud are not anxious or unstable. They are running an externalized version of a process the rest of us are running silently and worse. The kindergartener narrating their block tower, the surgeon muttering through a procedure, the engineer pacing a hallway describing a bug to nobody, the athlete repeating a cue to themselves before a free throw, they are all using the same ancient mechanism that builds and steers human thought. You can run the experiment yourself the next time you are stuck on something hard. Stop trying to solve it silently in your head. Say it out loud. Describe what you are seeing. Walk yourself through the steps as if you were explaining it to a colleague who is not in the room. And when something genuinely upsets you, switch to your own name. Ask why this person is feeling this way, instead of why I am feeling this way. The voice you have been told to keep quiet your entire life is one of the oldest pieces of cognitive technology you own. Most people are still embarrassed to use it.
1
35
1/2 De ”vakna” vet att den finaste formen av styre Ă€r elit-styre — detta visste Lenin och Hitler och Mao. Och Olof.. ..
Miljöpartiet har de högst utbildade representanterna och vÀljarna Sverigedemokraterna har de lÀgst utbildade representanterna och vÀljarna TrÄngsynthet och fördomar gÄr hand i hand med lÄg utbildning Sverige mÄste Äterbygga vÀrldens bÀsta skola NÀr vi gjort det förÀndras allt
3
50
2/2 Det största hotet mot den sk ”demokratin” Ă€r dock just elit-styre. NĂ€r Sekten av de Vetande fĂ„tt tillrĂ€cklig makt Ă€r det inte valfritt att tĂ€nka ”rĂ€tt” — dĂ„ SKA man tĂ€nka ”rĂ€tt”. youtu.be/wjec-0Ct2NY?is=Q64j

49
🇾đŸ‡Ș Grattis? Nationaldagen firas bĂ€st med en slĂ€ppt ballong — en — inte fler. Publiken skrattar. Det sorgligaste som finns Ă€r insikten att svensk identitet SKA ses som nĂ„got man frĂ€mst bör skĂ€mmas över. Om man absolut ska fira nĂ„got, Ă€r det hur lite vi firar. —Sjukt.đŸ–€
1
52
Presque Beignet retweeted
DzieƄ dobry.
63
295
2,147
61,258
Presque Beignet retweeted
If you oppose gender-segregated swimming pools - which still happens indirectly in Denmark due to special accommodations for Islam - there are seriously both clueless ethnic Danes and Muslims defending it with “but we also have cycling clubs and football teams split by gender.” That’s like comparing your private car to a bus everyone pays for through taxes. You decide in your own car. You don’t decide in the commons. Let me spell it out. Islam is an ideology with specific demands for how society should be organized. And when a publicly funded swimming pool starts organizing itself around those demands, that’s not tolerance - that’s submission. Paid for by you and me.
3
13
55
1,503
Ett land ska vara fyllt av möjligheter — inte en socialistisk parkering. Annika förstĂ„r inte att om Staten ger bort nĂ„got, blir det vĂ€rdelöst. Exempelvis: ‱ Kvinnor dras till yrken dĂ€r Staten tagit över, i skola och omsorg — dĂ€rför Ă€r dessa yrken dömda att urholkas.
Ett hem ska vara en rĂ€ttighet – inte en budgivning. Moderaterna vill införa fri hyressĂ€ttning för nya kontrakt. Risken Ă€r 25% högre hyror och ett Sverige dĂ€r plĂ„nboken avgör vem som fĂ„r bo var. Vi behöver bostĂ€der mĂ€nniskor har rĂ„d att bo i, inte marknadshyror.
83
HĂ€r ser du @GadSaad i SVTs morgonprogram.. .. i en parallell verklighet, dĂ€r ”Public Service” gör sitt job och verkligen utmanar den Socialistiska maktstrukturen.

19