Advocate for reproductive rights. The basis of my position is that govt has no legitimate duty or purpose for denying access to abortion.
Joined December 2017
- Tweets 7,448
- Following 73
- Followers 91
- Likes 1,827
155 Photos and videos
Pinned Tweet
27 Oct 2023
The Supreme Court's Dobbs decision will be overturned in time because it makes a critical error: it interprets the Constitution as conferring rights to the people (see screenshot) rather than conferring powers to the government. 1/x
7
1
8
3,393
Apr 7
"I can admit I may never 100% know the exact second a human life first begins."
ANTI-ABORT ADMITS LIFE DOESN'T BEGIN At conception!!!
Apr 2
There's really nothing I need from you.
You act as though the distinction between a human cell and a human organism is insignificant. Therefore you think you can justify there is no moral duty to protect until they get a government issued birth certificate.
I can admit I may never 100% know the exact second a human life first begins. But I do 100% know there are healthy unwanted human beings being ripped apart in the womb just because they are unwanted. Your blurred lines doesn't justify this. Your reframing pregnancy and motherhood as slavery lie doesn't justify this. That's all.
1
36
MakBuff retweeted
25 Nov 2025
Allow me to summarize where we are now by highlighting the 4 faults of the Pro Life argument
1. Govt is not authorized to act on behalf of the unborn or to restrict access to abortion. Such action serves no legitimate legislative purpose. It does not serve the purpose for...
25 Nov 2025
& a blastocyst is distinct from a zygote along that same continuous path
ur "construct" is based in religious ideology. It has nothing to do with cell theory, as u claimed
BTW, the biology of asexual reproduction shows us genetic individuation is not a requirement for offspring
1
1
1
82
Mar 9
Mar 9
Ahh so then you'd protect pedophiles, rapists, terrorists and traffickers. You're such a cuck and an embarrassment for all men. Men die defending against men who would kill and rape u as well, while u shit on the, with ur ignorance and pleading for attention of "Being a good guy"
1
1
40
MakBuff retweeted
Mar 8
Well, when a child is conceived, the DNA split is 50/50 from both parents. Except for one small detail: mitochondrial DNA. It’s passed down only through the mother and never through sperm.
Which means something interesting: all living humans can trace their mitochondrial line back to one woman, not one man.
And every daughter born continues passing that same line forward.
Happy Women’s Day 💐
393
11,999
77,394
3,180,675
Feb 20
I'm going to make this as simple as I can. PERSONHOOD IS NOT AN ARBITRARY DEFINITION.
It is the basis of law and govt. Legal personhood refers to born, socially situated individuals capable of entering the civil order.
Anti Aborts wish to use govt authority to impose...
1
1
2
48
Feb 20
...gestational servitude on people. But that govt authority is empowered & authorized by PEOPLE to effect THEIR SAFETY & HAPPINESS. It does not serve that purpose to impose gestational servitude on behalf of non-people. In fact, it is COUNTER TO THE VERY ESTABLISHMENT OF GOVT.
15
MakBuff retweeted
Feb 20
181 after its founding for the protection of slavery, the head of the SBC is espousing a counterfeit abolitionist doctrine of White Supremacy and State murder built upon a great evil: the forced reproductive labor of women and girls objectified as instruments for others’ use.
2
7
17
235
MakBuff retweeted
Feb 9
Let it Collapse!!!
Community note
Pam Bondi did not say that prosecuting everyone in the Epstein files would cause the system to collapse; no credible sources confirm this quote, which appears to originate from unverified social media memes. apnews.com/article/bondi-…
12,522
30,607
151,089
5,367,062
MakBuff retweeted
Feb 5
This is why representation matters for real change to happen.
46
1,225
6,183
52,048
Jan 29
The radical position is believing govt may usurp authority to impose gestational servitude, to compel the use of one's blood and organs to protect unborn life. The duty to weigh the conflicting needs of mom and unborn child belongs to mom, not govt
Jan 28
I am not the radical for believing child murder should be outlawed in the entirety of the United States. I am not the radical for standing against abortion.
The radical position is thinking it should be legal to murder a human being.
40
Jan 28
"People/Person" is the sovereignty of our nation and the basis of legal authority for our Constitution and the establishment of our nation, but this guy dismisses it as a mere philosophical term.
Jan 28
That's some good Jeffersonian PHILOSOPHY there buddy
1
18
Jan 28
Holocaust victims were never called "not people," they were fully recognized as people, then had their rights removed. Abortion involves the unavoidable threshold of personhood - those that precede it are unprotected, even when PLers set the threshold.
1
23
Jan 23
"Person" is the only term for individual life forms subject to govt duty. There is no govt duty to ZEFs, there is no constitutionally-conferred authority to restrict access to abortion, & we already prohibited states from denying liberty without a legitimate legislative purpose
Jan 22
Person is not a scientific term. Please stick to science of the term offspring
If you want to be anti science, please stop discussing abortion. This is beyond you if you bring in psychology
1
28
Jan 23
I am pro choice. The duty to weigh the conflicting needs of mother and unborn child belongs entirely to mom. Any attempt to take it from her is a constitutional violation. I'm interested in making sure zealots don't force govt overreach.
Jan 23
I’m a pro-lifer. I’m not interested in “controlling anyones body.” I’m interested in making sure babies aren’t murdered.
12
MakBuff retweeted
Today should have been the 53rd anniversary of the Roe v. Wade decision. We should be celebrating the historic constitutional recognition of our inalienable right to bodily autonomy; instead, we are mourning the injustice of this right being cruelly stripped away.
1
3
9
4,052
MakBuff retweeted
Too many people wrongly think this administration’s is done attacking abortion access, but that couldn’t be further from the truth.
We MUST remember that our reproductive rights are still in serious danger.
reproductiverights.org/trump…
2
1
3
331
Jan 15
You have valid points, and they illustrate why I modified the question. We cannot answer when a developing human individual gains value, but we can answer when govt gains a duty to us.
We the people (those engaging in civil society) established govt to effect OUR safety &...
Your argument seems to be that unless you can identify a distinct instant in which something goes from "killable trash" to "human life", then it remains eternally "killable trash" - so again, I ask you, when does a human being developing in the womb transition from trash to life?
1
57
Jan 15
...that pro-lifers claim biology requires that developing humans are "killable trash" before fertilization & gain personhood value after, & it annoys me even more that they believe biology supports their authoritarian views, the usurpation of govt power, the denial of liberty,...
1
6
Jan 15
...& the imposition of gestational servitude. Biology, most certainly, does none of this, as I have shown via citations from noted embryologists & philosophers.
The duty to determine the unborn child's value is mom's alone.
6