This is correct. And to be fair to blacks, it’s not even an IQ disparity issue. Whites find black social norms just as incomprehensible as they find ours. And this poor theory of mind is precisely why Progressives support Civil Rights, BLM, etc. or adjacent ideas like immigration or religious freedom in the first place. They genuinely think that Western (white) social norms and values are the universal norms and values held by everyone on earth, rather than just white people and those we forced them on in the past. The idea that blacks or other “oppressed” groups could be receiving just punishment for behavior downstream from their values sounds completely implausible to libs because for whatever reason its just universally the case that most people, regardless of race, cannot comprehend the idea that values are not universal. Much more plausible is that blacks do have the same values as us and the disparate outcomes are a product of something else. Most notably, all the forcing we did on them in the past. Libs genuinely believe that they were just like us, or at least on their way to being so, and then we exploited and abused them for no reason, and that made them misbehave (or further, that they aren’t even misbehaving today, we are just continuing to exploit and oppress them) Regretfully, and I genuinely say this regretfully, wishing it weren’t true: the truth is almost the complete opposite. All that force was actually the only thing that civilized them at all. The degree to which they are like us now is the degree to which our assimilation worked, and the degree to which they maintain disparate outcomes is the degree to which they have remained like themselves. It is not a coincidence that black outcomes have WORSENED in direct proportion that racism has LESSENED. Nor is it a coincidence that ghettos look like Africa. It was precisely the boot of our norms on their neck that caused them to follow them. And it has been precisely the degree with which that boot has been lifted, the degree to which we have given them the freedom to return to their preferred, more innate norms, that they have deviated from them and started to recreate in our land the land that made them who they are.

NATO is in far bigger danger than anyone realizes. And the reason has nothing to do with defense budgets. The real danger is psychological. It’s cultural. Europeans didn’t just free-ride on American security for 80 years. They built an entire identity around the idea that they evolved past the Americans protecting them. That identity is now the single biggest obstacle to Western survival. And the darkest irony is: we helped build it. After World War II, Europe wasn’t just economically shattered. Its culture was in ruins. The cities, the universities, the concert halls, the museums. Rubble. The Marshall Plan rebuilt the economy. But culture wasn’t a priority. Not at first. Then the Iron Curtain dropped. And suddenly culture became a weapon. American diplomats, academics, artists & scholars flooded Western Europe. We funded their universities. Supported their orchestras. Rebuilt their museums. Promoted their intellectual life. Not because European culture needed saving for its own sake. Because Eastern Europeans were struggling for Maslow’s mist basic needs. We needed the view from the other side of that Wall to be intoxicating. So America built Western Europe into a showcase of self-actualization. Art. Philosophy. Cafe culture. Long vacations. Universities where people studied literature instead of surviving. We were manufacturing jealousy. And it worked. The Wall came down. But here’s what no one accounted for. When you give a society self-actualization on someone else’s tab long enough, they forget it was a gift. They start believing it was organically theirs. And when they look at the country that funded it all, a country busy building aircraft carriers and semiconductor fabs and shale fields instead of reaching the Maslow’s pinnacle. An overweight American in a ball cap who can’t tell Monet from Pissarro. Who eats fast food. Who drives a truck. Who builds strip malls instead of piazzas. And to a culture trained in aesthetics but stripped of strategic awareness, that American looks uncivilized. So the arrogance takes root. And once a culture decides another is beneath them, they stop listening. Americans say wars are sometimes necessary: crude. Oil is the backbone of prosperity: unsophisticated. Kids build companies in garages that reshape the planet: crass. Wall Street finances the global economy: vulgar. Europe has no world-class technology sector. No military capable of strong defense. No energy independence. No AI capacity. What Europe has is culture. The culture we paid for at the expense of us reaching Maslow’s pinnacle. For decades that was fine. We funded the museums, protected the sea lanes, and tolerated the sneering because the arrangement worked. Then Europeans stopped keeping the contempt private. They started saying it to our faces. In their media. In their parliaments. At every international forum. “Americans are stupid. Americans are violent. Americans are a threat to democracy.” We could have moved the Louvre to NY. We could have built a Venice here. We could have stolen your best artists, designers, philosophers and more… like your conquering armies did for centuries. Instead we funded them. And all we asked for in return was to let us visit. You don’t have the military to defend your borders. You don’t have the technology to compete. You don’t have the energy to heat your homes without begging dictators. What you have is an 80-year superiority complex FUNDED BY AMERICANS, protected by American soldiers, and built on the false belief that self-actualization is civilization. It isn’t. Civilization is the ability to sustain itself. By that measure, Europe isn’t a civilization at all. It’s a dependency with better wine. That’s not a threat. It’s a weather report. Build a Navy. Or don’t. But stop lecturing the people who made you “better than us” Our “crudeness” our “stunted liberal education” our “ugly strip malls” are because we sacrificed our culture to support yours.

I’m noticing a lot of foreigners who seem to not understand why we’d risk hundreds of lives, spend millions of dollars, and sacrifice several aircraft to rescue one guy. And the reason they don’t understand is also the reason people can’t be made American by a piece of paper.

From Martin Iles, reposted: Having lived in the USA for nearly two years, I've realised something. The USA and the remainder of the Western world are no longer aligned. We all laugh and mock when the Americans say, "Freedom!" because we truly think we're as free as they are. Wrong. We're not. Not even close. The laws, the mindset, and the behaviour, is totally different in this regard. Most of all, the governments are totally different. The USA's convictions around core freedoms are on a scale we do not share. Meanwhile, Donald Trump wins the popular vote, the electoral college, the House, and the Senate... a man who, in every other Western country, is held in open derision, if not contempt. For these and other reasons, we are not the same. Yet the West, including Australia, fully expect to rely on the USA for our very survival. If the world turns bad (which will happen - only a question of time), then the whole West, without America, is toast. So, you may ask - if we're not very aligned ideologically, then it must be that we bring something to the party militarily? Well, no... actually... we don't matter that much militarily. The USA has about 470 ships in its navy, including 11 aircraft carriers, 69 submarines, 75 destroyers... plus 110 new ships in the pipeline. Australia has about 30, including 3 destroyers, 7 frigates and 7 outdated submarines. The UK does a little better, with about 60. Meanwhile, the US has over 14,000 military aircraft. A staggering number. Australia has 252 military aircraft. The UK has 556. The US army has just shy of 1,000,000 uniformed personnel in its military. Australia has about 45,000. The USA spends 3.4% ($968 billion) of its GDP on defence. Australia spends 2% ($36.4 billion). The US spends as much as the next 15 largest military-spending countries (including China) combined. The USA has a fighting culture. The men shoot things (a lot) and hunt things, the veterans get favoured in everything from parking spots to boarding planes. A uniformed young man is thanked in the street a dozen times a day. "Oh, the Americans and their guns!" we say, in our smug way. Yes, they have a warrior culture. We do not. We don't have to, because we're a leech on theirs. How many young British men are willing to fight for their country? Now ask the same regarding young American men. The difference is about as wide as it could be. Militarily, we don't offer squat. Meanwhile, look at the way Australia works against America's interests by loving on China. China made us rich and we stay close. This is a Marxist regime with expansionist aims. Again, you have to spend time in the USA to realise just how vast a gulf there is between us on China. Europe, too. They let China have their way everywhere from Germany to Greenland, all the while importing Islam and sending their own people to court for saying hurty words. Somehow, we have landed the deal of a lifetime with the USA that says, "when the baddies come, you'll save us ok?" Because we can't save ourselves. And we live in peace. But we keep gnawing away at freedoms, keep enabling China, and get flabby and disinterested about our military because Uncle Sam's got it. And, let's be honest, Americans are widely looked down on. To add insult to injury, we don't think that highly of our protectors. So, the USA is finally saying "enough." I am here, I can tell you what the vibe is, and that's it. Trump is doing what people want in this regard. They're over it. And we come across all shocked and hard done by. We behave like people with no self-insight at all. Yes, the global alliance system is all over the place now. From America's perspective, it's about time. And I must say, though I be a proud Australian, I am forced to agree. Something has to change.

🚨BREAKING Essex police have TURNED OFF their live facial recognition cameras as they were catching too many black people 🇬🇧 They have also admitted that it was EXTREMELY rare the cameras would pick somebody up who WASN’T on the watchlist. They put up cameras to catch bad people, the cameras caught the bad people who happened to be predominantly black so they turned the cameras off 😑

The war in Iran has cost less American lives than America loses every week to black crime and illegal alien car accidents.

No third term President is illegal on stolen land

When a Canadian doctor says: "Would you rather have a Trans child or a dead child?", this is not a threat. He's just making you aware that he now offers both of these services.

⚡️BREAKING: IRAN'S SUPREME LEADER HAS BEEN KILLED AND HIS BODY RETRIEVED, ACCORDING TO ISRAELI MEDIA. Analysis: If that headline is real and accurate, then this is the biggest structural shock in the region in decades. Deep down, here’s the breakdown: If he is truly dead and the body has been retrieved, the regime is now running on muscle memory and coercion alone. The ideological apex is gone. The symbol that arbitrated factions is gone. That does not mean instant collapse. It means the glue changes. The first force to take control will be the IRGC. Not reformists. Not moderates. The IRGC already owns the guns, surveillance, prisons, payroll, and regional proxy network. In a vacuum, the organized coercive structure wins. In the immediate term, expect consolidation, not chaos. Curfews. Internet tightening. Loyalty statements. Public unity messaging. External retaliation attempts to prove deterrence still exists. A junta mindset. The real instability comes slightly after that. Once the symbolic center is gone, three pressures build: Factional rivalry inside the elite Street belief that change is possible Commanders calculating their own survival odds If the IRGC projects total cohesion fast, the regime hardens and becomes more militarized. If cohesion wobbles, defections and fragmentation become possible. This is the hinge. A dead Supreme Leader does not automatically mean regime collapse. It means the regime transitions from ideological theocracy anchored in a single figure to overt security-state logic anchored in the Guard. The next 48 to 96 hours determine the direction. If a successor is named quickly and the IRGC appears unified, the system stabilizes under harder rule. If there is delay, confusion, or visible jockeying, that is where nonlinear outcomes begin. My honest read if this headline is true: short-term consolidation, medium-term volatility, long-term structural weakening. The regime would survive the first shock. The question is whether it survives the second one.

I'm never deleting this app ☠️

⚡️This is a Treasury Secretary telling the world that the old lie is no longer worth protecting. The lie being that monetary policy is independent, technocratic, and in control. When that lie becomes too expensive to maintain, the state burns it. That is what you are watching. 1. This is an admission that the system is operating past its design limits Treasury does not publicly humiliate the Fed unless the internal math already failed. The constraints are obvious to anyone inside: • debt service is structurally explosive • deficits are politically untouchable • growth cannot absorb the interest burden • labor stress cannot be allowed to metastasize • yields cannot be allowed to clear honestly When every lever is constrained, the fiction of clean policy becomes useless. So they drop it. 2. This is fiscal dominance declaring itself out loud For years, fiscal dominance existed quietly. Now it is being normalized socially. The message is simple: • monetary purity is a luxury • independence is conditional • survival overrides doctrine Treasury is telling the Fed, markets, and the public the same thing at once. “We will do what is necessary, and we will decide who absorbs the blame.” 3. This is preemptive inoculation against future backlash Treasury knows what the next phase looks like: • intervention dressed as stabilization • yield management without the name • facilities that quietly replace rate policy • inflation volatility that cannot be modeled away • asset support justified as systemic protection When that happens, outrage must already have a target. So the target is established early. 4. This is why the language is mocking, not analytical Mockery is not accidental. Mockery collapses legitimacy faster than critique. By framing the Fed as unserious and insulated, Treasury achieves: • public permission to interfere • cover for coordination • insulation for fiscal decisions • a scapegoat for structural failure This is narrative warfare, not debate. 5. This connects directly to labor underemployment and social strain Treasury sees the real labor market: • hours cut before layoffs • job quality eroding • AI blocking reacceleration • households stretching credit • belief decaying before income collapses The state cannot allow labor stress, yield stress, and inflation stress simultaneously. So it chooses which institutions take damage. The Fed is one of them. 6. This is how late systems buy time They convert trust into fuel. Central bank credibility becomes a resource. Once used, it does not regenerate. That is why this moment matters more than any CPI print. Here is the deeper truth nobody says: The Fed is being sacrificed. Sacrificed so deficits can persist. Sacrificed so yields can be managed. Sacrificed so labor stress stays contained. Sacrificed so the political surface remains calm. This is coordination under existential constraint. And once a system starts openly spending its credibility to survive, it has already crossed the line where outcomes are managed, not solved. That is where we are now. And that state does not walk itself back.

And with that, he has now spent more time attacking Massie simply for getting married than he has Fauci for killing your grandmother or Epstein for trafficking young girls.

"𝘑𝘌𝘖𝘗𝘈𝘙𝘋𝘠 𝕏" Guest star Donald Trump. They're going to ban AI after this. Apologies in advance.

I remember when people used to be ashamed of needing government handouts to provide food for THEIR OWN CHILDREN. I miss that. Now, they’re not only proud, they’re oozing entitlement. Bring back shame.

Dear @WhiteHouse, I Know this is a kind shot, but My name is Rodney Smith Jr. I live in Huntsville, AL. I’m currently traveling to all 50 states mowing lawns for veterans, active duty service members, Gold Star families & widows. I’m also sharing their stories . This is my way of honoring them. As founder of a nonprofit with 6,000 kids mowing FREE lawns for the elderly, disabled, single parents & veterans nationwide, I’d be honored to bring my USA Flag Mower to mow at the Arlington National Cemetery where veterans rest. I’m currently in the New England area heading down the East Coast before Florida, then Alaska. Thank you for your consideration. — Rodney

Portland, Ore. — A resident living near the ICE facility praises President Trump for deploying the military/federal agents to quash Antifa: "I am so happy that President Trump is deploying the National Guard. We have been asking for help for months."

WOW: Congressional source now confirming nearly 300 FBI operatives embedded in the crowd on J6 Here’s one of them, breaking into the Capitol and blaming it on an innocent bystander J6 was a Fedsurrection setup—just like I’ve said for FOUR YEARS They ruined our lives for a scam!

Wow!!!! Read this comment from a University of Wisconsin-River Falls professor, which he posted on Wisconsin Right Now Facebook. Make this go viral!! Profile in courage!!!!! Get this guy on national TV. uwrf.edu/FacultyStaff/562068…