Example of how FIFA deals with a freelance journalist
@tomyarguelles is a Venezuelan 🇻🇪 sports journalist based in Dallas, USA. He contributes to various international media outlets and social media platforms:
- Balonazos (Venezuela)
- Alerta Mundial News (Spain)
- TTWCS (USA)
Like all journalists, Arguelles applied for accreditation via FIFA’s media platform. To do so, you must register the media outlet you work for. He chose to list ‘Balonazos’ alongside his Venezuelan press card.
Once accepted – albeit belatedly – the application required a specific code that the national football association of the media outlet in question had to provide to the journalist.
However, the Venezuelan Football Federation had received only six codes and had already allocated them, given the delays on FIFA’s part in processing Arguelles’ application.
When he approached FIFA’s media department to resubmit his application using one of the other media outlets he works for, his request was flatly rejected.
Embarrassed, the Venezuelan Football Federation asked FIFA for an additional code so that the journalist could obtain his accreditation. The request was refused again, even though it was the delay caused by FIFA’s media department – which the organisation itself acknowledged – that was at the root of the problem.
Worse still, FIFA had the audacity to tell Arguelles that he was “welcome” to cover the World Cup but only “through the proper channels” via the Venezuelan Football Federation.
A strange message: with FIFA, it doesn’t matter whether you’re a professional journalist or not, but simply that you have followers; the more you have, the more welcome you really are. The others, the less well-known ones, can just keep waiting