Cardano protocols need to consider economic risks, not just security risks
In today’s DeFi, getting a loan means being exposed to 2 built-in economic risks:
❌ Margin call risk: You can pay back your loan on time every time, yet still have your assets liquidated because of a sudden price dip.
❌ Idle collateral trap: Your collateral gets locked away. It can’t be staked, lent, or used for governance votes. It becomes idle capital.
(There’s also oracle risks, but that’s a discussion for another time.)
Neither of these is a hack or a smart contract bug. Neither are they security risks.
The current iteration of DeFi has been designed to shift price volatility onto the borrower. (That’s not how Tradfi does loans.)
The risks have been pushed so far onto one side that a responsible borrower can still get punished, even if they do everything right.
The DeFi Kernel addresses these economic design flaws by restructuring the loan itself.
Instead of open-ended margin positions, loans become fixed-term agreements.
Both sides know exactly when and how the loan will be repaid. And the protocol only acts when a scheduled payment is missed. Not based on random market price dips.
And instead of idle collateral, the pledged assets can still earn yield or participate in governance. This removes a major friction for participation in Cardano Defi.
By reducing risk on borrowers, we can make borrowing more attractive.
Security risks will always be important. Now we need to learn how to address economic risks.