En un país donde se dice que se respeta la libertad de expresión, los periodistas continuamos yendo a los tribunales, demandados.

We had intelligence reports at our disposal based on an analysis of the internal situation in Russia and on documents that land directly on the Russian leader's desk—according to Zelenskyy. Putin rarely receives completely truthful information devoid of sugar-coating. The projected figures regarding Russian public dissatisfaction with Putin are set to rise steadily. The President added that the reports available to him did not yet take into account events from June, July, and August—events that will inevitably have a further impact on the situation in Russia. Consequently, Putin will face even worse figures in September, and our pressure will continue.

"Para mí, democracia, verdaderamente, es el gobierno del pueblo, por el pueblo y para el pueblo. ¿Los gobiernos panameñistas han sido así? ¿O han sido estados, han propiciado el estado de derecho en este país? No. Entonces estamos igual que antes del 68. Aunque ahora en el 2024 llegaron 23 (diputados), creo que fueron independientes o con moca y los vamos, pero manifiesta o es una carta de presentación para los politiqueros de que en Panamá hay democracia. Pero por más que llegaran 20, 25, 30, si no llegan a 36, no pueden hacer nada en la asamblea. Los diputados de vamos, los diputados de moca no han entendido eso y creen que presentando cualquier proyecto que puede ser bueno en el fondo, pero si el sistema no funciona bien es por gusto... son ingenuos". @jgaGamboa, Analista Político. En #RadioGrafía con @HugoFamania y @felixchaveztv por @ecopanamaTV y @rpc_radio

Western audiences are completely failing to grasp the monumental scale of the war in Ukraine due to a constant barrage of disinformation and competing international crises. The sheer volume of casualties (including civilian) has been systematically downplayed, leaving the true magnitude of the war nearly invisible outside of Ukraine itself. There is a pervasive belief among even pro-Ukrainian Europeans that this conflict is a somewhat ”clean” war with limited civilian casualties. This narrative flies in the face of reality, as the war has amassed approximately 2 million total casualties over the last four and a half years, with a breakdown of approximately two-thirds Russian and one-third Ukrainian. Despite Russia having more total casualties, Ukraine has dozens of times more civilian casualties than Russia. This crushing disparity tells you everything about the ruthless reality of Russia's campaign. A purely numerical comparison with the war in Gaza highlights the gap in Western perception. As of May 2026, more than two years of war in Gaza resulted in at least 75,811 reported deaths, both sides included. In stark contrast, the Uppsala Conflict Data Program reveals that the single three-month siege of Mariupol saw between 27,000 and 88,000 fatalities. Most of them were Ukrainian civilians. Even though Mariupol had a population five times smaller than Gaza, its death toll in just three months potentially surpassed Gaza's total over two years. On a bigger level, the approximately 2 million total casualties in Ukraine match the population of the entire Gaza Strip. This comparison is strictly statistical, used only because the public is highly aware of Gaza's bloodshed. The Kremlin has skillfully hidden its atrocities and suppressed civilian casualty data in occupied areas, but the West must look past the propaganda and recognize the historic scale of this devastation

1/ Last month I told a room of Baltic intelligence officers and diplomats that Donald Trump is an asset of Russian intelligence. Not one of them blinked. "Of course," they said. Ho hum. But in America, saying it out loud is still taboo. Why? 🧵

Military historian Phillips O’Brien: There have been no U.S. peace efforts in Ukraine. There have been efforts to get Putin a very good deal, forcing Ukrainians to give up more territory and people. That is not peace. That is Washington trying to deliver Putin a success. 1/

En otro ataque, Ucrania destruyó la infraestructura crítica del puerto de Mariupol en la zona ocupada. Sus muelles eran usados para la logística militar y para exportar la producción de las regiones invadidas desde 2022. Video de @azov_media

◾🇬🇧 | TECNOGOLPISMO Y NUEVO ORDEN La acusación del primer ministro de UK, Keir Starmer, a Elon Musk por alentar los disturbios en Belfast es un gran ejemplo del poder tecnofeudal para desestabilizar países remotamente y hacer del dueño de una plataforma un peligroso agitador: 1/ El secuestro del algoritmo Cuando un oligarca tecnológico con control absoluto sobre una infraestructura de comunicación interviene en una crisis social, la neutralidad de la red pasa a ser un mito. La sola posibilidad de modificar el alcance algorítmico para amplificar narrativas de odio y fijar listas de objetivos en el terreno no es libertad de expresión: es la coordinación táctica de la violencia. 2/ La impunidad extraterritorial El tecnogolpismo opera como un juego sádico desde la inmunidad de la distancia: Un multimillonario en California enciende la mecha social en Irlanda del Norte, explota sus traumas históricos y observa las consecuencias materiales desde la seguridad de su corporación. Así los Estados-nación tradicionales descubren que su andamiaje jurídico es obsoleto ante la velocidad de la luz digital. 3/ El bucle de la violencia El dispositivo tecnopolítico no inventa el descontento, o quizás sí, pero lo que hace sistemáticamente es tomar el brote radical y procesarlo como combustible de guerra cultural. Es tan fácil como ocultar los llamados a la calma, priorizar el extremismo, exponer sobre las demás una lectura del debilitamiento institucional (por más pobre que sea) y traducir el caos digital en fuego analógico en las calles. Así de simple se valida cualquier narrativa basada en la nada sobre que el Estado ha perdido el control. 4/ La mutación de los golpes La transición del golpe de Estado militar clásico a la interferencia por plataformas digitales se ejecuta bajo tres acciones clave: × Alteración algorítmica de la realidad y difusión masiva de desinformación × Exclusión informacional controlada por código privado × Subordinación de la fuerza legítima al poder de los servicios corporativos × Presión extorsiva tecnofeudal para la facilitación de negocios o dádivas 5/ El negocio del caos El ecosistema corporativo de la interfaz que premia el engagement reactivo (el odio, el miedo y la polarización extrema) no solo revela un modelo cuyos activos monetizables son directamente nocivos para la paz social. Revela que el tecnogolpismo es un modelo de negocios redondo por el que las plataformas ya no son ni intermediarias ni neutrales: son actores geopolíticos que desafían directamente la soberanía de las democracias. 6/ Deberíamos alarmarnos El escenario en Belfast demuestra que la propiedad concentrada de la infraestructura cognitiva sitúa a los señores feudales de Silicon Valley por encima de la ley de los países afectados. La soberanía estatal queda reducida a un decorado inútil si la arquitectura que modula la percepción y la acción de las masas pertenece a un panóptico privado transnacional. 7/ Si el futuro pertenece a quienes controlen la infraestructura de las redes y la moderación del código, la emancipación política exige tomar consciencia ahora mismo sobre la naturaleza real de las plataformas. Y también tomar conciencia que sin soberanía tecnológica será imposible sobrevivir en democracia fuera del alcance del tecno feudalismo y de una comunidad organizada y consciente de sus riesgos en la era del tecnogolpismo. 🏛️🇬🇧🧠

This is exactly how it was designed to be under Project 2025. MAGA have installed their Caesar as was the aim of those who bought him the keys to the White House and are pulling the strings in the shadows. This is why government no longer functions as intended by the Founding Fathers. Washington is now the headquarters of feudal America where Trump is king (until he isn’t). Take a listen to Peter Baker from the New York Times, in this trailer for the documentary Trump’s Power and the Rule of law. 🎥 TikTok - vm.tiktok.com/ZNRchcEmH/

Los tecno oligarcas no existen, no pueden hacerte daño. El informe de la Oxfam de hoy: 1. Mañana Elon Musk se convierte en el primer billonario de la historia: con más riqueza combinada del 46% más pobre de la humanidad. De un lado de la balanza, 3.800 millones de personas. Del otro, un solo hombre. Su fortuna creció a un ritmo de más de un millón de dólares por minuto durante el último año. 2. Con el 10% de esa fortuna se terminaría la pobreza extrema en el planeta durante un año entero: más de 800 millones de personas arriba de la línea. Una décima parte del patrimonio de un solo hombre alcanza para resolver, aunque sea por doce meses, el problema más antiguo de la humanidad. Si donara 100 dólares a cada habitante de la Tierra, seguiría estando entre los diez más ricos del mundo. 3. Parte de esa fortuna se construyó sobre el Estado. SpaceX obtiene una quinta parte de sus ingresos de contratos con el gobierno norteamericano y, según Oxfam, probablemente no pagó impuesto federal a las ganancias gracias a los beneficios de la reforma impositiva de Trump. Ganancias privadas alimentadas con fondos públicos, y una obsesión militante por no devolver nada. 4. De empleo como andamos? SpaceX busca una valuación de 1,75 billones de dólares con menos de 19 mil empleados: unos 93 millones de dólares de valuación por cada puesto de trabajo. Tesla, la automotriz más valiosa del mundo, emplea 135 mil personas; General Motors llegó a emplear 850 mil en su pico. Las empresas que concentran la riqueza del siglo XXI generan una fracción del trabajo que generaban las del siglo XX, y su promesa de valor es la inteligencia artificial: la tecnología diseñada para necesitar cada vez menos gente. Las puertas de entrada al mercado laboral ya se están cerrando para los jóvenes en todo el mundo. Nunca tan pocos acumularon tanto empleando tan poco. 5. Seis milmillonarios controlan nueve de las diez mayores redes sociales del planeta. Ocho de las diez principales empresas de IA están en manos de milmillonarios; tres concentran el 90% del mercado de chatbots. La riqueza extrema compró las plataformas donde se discute la riqueza extrema. La desigualdad económica se volvió desigualdad política. La versión criolla de este modelo se está cocinando en el Congreso de la Nación con los proyectos de Javier Milei con el guion de Peter Thiel.

Republicans win the White House, enact trickle-down tax cuts, and collapse the economy. Feel like we've been here before? Here's why it keeps happening.

And tje geift goes on. And on, and on, and on...

We are grateful to all the people of Estonia, President @AlarKaris, and First Lady Sirje Karis for their constant and unwavering support for Ukraine and our people. Today in Tallinn, important meetings are planned with all the Nordic and Baltic countries. The main goal is to secure more strength to protect our people, as well as to prepare for the negotiations and decisions we all expect from the European Union, G7, and NATO summits. The First Lady’s agenda includes taking part in the expansion of the Global Coalition of Ukrainian Studies, the opening of a Ukrainian-language audio guide in Estonia, and a meeting with representatives of the Estonian Center for International Development to implement joint projects in support of Ukrainian families. We appreciate the solidarity of Estonia and all our partners who help Ukraine withstand and bring a just peace closer. We thank everyone who supports us.

BREAKING📷 A woman donated $1 million to Trump's super PAC. Three weeks later, her son a convicted tax criminal was pardoned. His pardon application literally mentioned her donation. Her name is Elizabeth Fago. Her son, Paul Walczak, had pleaded guilty to federal tax crimes. The pardon application filed on his behalf explicitly cited his mother's million-dollar donation to MAGA Inc. as a reason he deserved clemency. Trump signed the pardon. Walczak walked free and was relieved of more than $4 million in restitution he owed. That is one entry on a donor list of 58 people who gave a million dollars or more. MAGA Inc., Trump's super PAC, has now raised over $305 million since the 2024 election five times more than any presidential super PAC in history at this stage. The Brennan Center called it "completely unprecedented." Ninety-six percent of it came from donors giving $1 million or more. Sixty-two percent from those giving $5 million or more. This is not a grassroots operation. It is a pay-window. Here's what the donor list actually shows. Crypto.com's parent company, Foris Dax, gave $30 million — while it was under SEC investigation for allegedly trading unregistered securities. The SEC investigation was quietly dropped in March 2025, two months after the donation. The Winklevoss twins gave $1 million — also while their crypto platform Gemini was under SEC investigation. That investigation was dropped in February 2025. Energy Transfer, the Texas pipeline company, and its CEO Kelcy Warren gave a combined $25 million — while Energy Transfer was actively suing a federal regulatory agency in court. OpenAI President Greg Brockman and his wife gave $25 million — as the Trump administration was actively shaping AI policy in Silicon Valley's favor. Then there are the appointments. Benjamin Landa gave $5 million then became Trump's ambassador to Hungary. Kelly Loeffler and her husband gave $5 million she now runs the Small Business Administration. Warren Stephens gave $2 million now ambassador to the United Kingdom. Jared Isaacman gave $2 million now NASA administrator. And Isabela Herrera, a 25-year-old self-employed financial consultant whose only prior political donation was $20 to Pete Buttigieg in 2020, somehow contributed $3.5 million to MAGA Inc. Her father a Venezuelan billionaire facing federal bribery charges was pardoned by Trump in January 2026. Campaign Legal Center has filed a formal complaint with the FEC alleging she was a straw donor for her father. This is not dark money. This is public record. Every dollar, every favor, every pardon. Filed with the FEC. Sitting in plain sight. If you appreciate my posts, it would mean the world if you followed my page. Thank you for being here

In 1879, JP Morgan paid a man to invent the lie that is the foundation of modern economics. A billionaire who helped start Amazon just exposed the whole thing on Diary of a CEO, and once you hear it you will never look at paychecks the same way again: 146 years ago, a guy named Henry George wrote a book called Progress and Poverty. It was the first mainstream book about the rich systematically stealing from the poor, and It literally became the bestselling book in the history of the United States at the time. The working class was reading it everywhere, and the people at the top of the economy completely lost their minds. So JP Morgan personally brought a man named John Bates Clark to Columbia University, which was essentially the intellectual headquarters of Wall Street, and told him to fix the problem. Clark wrote a book called The Distribution of Wealth. In it, he invented something called the "theory of marginal productivity," which claims that because markets are perfectly efficient, the amount of money you earn reflects EXACTLY the value you contribute to the economy. If you make $15,000 a year, that's because you're providing $15,000 of value. If a hedge fund manager makes $500 million a year moving money around, that's an accurate reflection of the value he creates in the world. And Clark literally said the quiet part out loud IN HIS OWN BOOK. He wrote that they had to prove to working people that no matter how much they make, whether it's a little or a lot, it accurately reflects their value, because if workers ever concluded that their labor was worth more than they were being paid, they would revolt and destroy the entire system. That was the whole point. The theory was built to prevent a revolution. And it worked so well that it got absorbed into mainstream economics and is STILL taught as a foundational principle to this day. Every time a CEO tells you "the market decides your salary," they're repeating a framework that was literally commissioned by JP Morgan in the 1800s to convince you not to ask for more. Nick Hanauer, the billionaire who told this story, also shared the numbers that prove why it matters right now: The median full-time worker in America earns about $60,000 a year. If that same worker had maintained the same share of GDP they held in 1975, they wouldn't be making $60,000. They'd be making $120,000. That gap goes all the way up to the 90th percentile. If you earn $180,000 today, you'd be earning $250,000 under the old distribution. The ONLY people who benefited from 50 years of economic growth were the top 10%, and the vast majority of that went to the top 1%. That is trillions of dollars every single year that used to be wages for ordinary working people and now sits in the accounts of the wealthiest people on the planet. This happened because of policy. Tax cuts for the rich, deregulation for the powerful, and wage suppression for everyone else, all justified by an economic theory that was invented specifically to make you believe you deserve exactly what you're getting. And the craziest part is that GDP growth rates in America were 4 to 4.5% for decades when workers were included in prosperity. As soon as the neoliberals took over in the mid-1970s and implemented these policies, GDP growth fell to 3% and eventually to 2%. Including people in the economy doesn't slow growth down. It's literally the thing that CREATES growth. And the theory that convinced the world otherwise was a hit job paid for by one of the richest men in history to keep workers quiet. What do you think?

Smooth 😎

El ministro de Obras Públicas, José Luis Andrade, ha inspeccionado, modificado y encarecido una carretera millonaria en la provincia de Veraguas, en la que participó como contratista nueve meses antes. Por esta servidora: laestrella.com.pa/panama/nac…

Europe Wins Again. Obviously. Armenia went to the polls yesterday. And the results are exactly what you’d expect if you’d been paying attention for the past five years, rather than wallowing in Kremlin nostalgia like a damp sock. Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan declared victory on Monday, with his Civil Contract Party leading with 52.5% of the vote.  Armenia, a landlocked country the size of Belgium that Russia has spent decades treating as a vassal state, has looked at its options and made a decision that required roughly the same level of intellectual effort as choosing between a Michelin-starred restaurant and a skip fire. They chose Europe. This election was less a routine vote than a referendum on Pashinyan’s post-2020 course reducing dependence on Russia and moving toward an explicit European orientation. And Russia, naturally, did everything in its power to stop it. According to Reuters, citing Western intelligence officials, the election faced heavy Russian covert interference, including disinformation campaigns and a plan to transport Russian Armenians into Armenia to sway the vote. One analyst collective described it as one of the largest state-backed disinformation campaigns in modern European history. And Armenia still told them to get lost. Putin had already warned Armenia it would face economic consequences for drifting westward, and introduced restrictions on Armenian agricultural exports in the weeks before the vote.  Threats, propaganda, economic blackmail. The full Russian toolkit. Result: irrelevant. Now, Trump, Tucker Carlson and JD Vance would like you to believe that Russia represents some superior civilisational model. A proud, white, Christian fortress holding the line against the Muslim hordes supposedly swamping Europe. It is a compelling narrative, in the same way that flat earth theory is compelling if you ignore every single fact available to you. Here is one such fact: between 10 and 15 percent of Russia’s own population is Muslim. Tatars, Bashkirs, Chechens, Ingush, Dagestanis. Millions of them. Russia is, by its own demographic reality, a multi-ethnic, multi-faith state with a larger Muslim population than most of Western Europe. But you’re not supposed to know that. It complicates the story. Meanwhile, the Muslim share of the EU population sits at around 5 percent. But the Tucker Carlsons of the world need you frightened, so the numbers get quietly shuffled off stage. So Armenia joins the queue. Behind Georgia, Ukraine, Moldova, and every Eastern European country that isn’t currently run by a Slovak who seems to have wandered in from a Moscow focus group. The pattern is not subtle. Every country that has actually experienced Russian influence in practice is sprinting in the opposite direction. The only nation currently moving toward Russia’s orbit is the United States, which managed to elect a man whose foreign policy instincts were apparently shaped by a property developer’s admiration for strongmen with good buildings. The world watches America and hopes it finds its way back. Most people think it will. Eventually. The damage, however, is already considerable, and democracy, like a soufflé, does not always survive rough handling. Armenia made its choice. The right one. Obviously. Gandalv / @Microinteracti1 x.com/LesiaLVD/status/206374…

Here's the full chain of events that led to Trump storming out of his interview with Kristin Welker, beginning with her pressing him on the weaponization fund, continuing with her pointing out the baselessness of his "rigged election" lies, and concluding with him calling her "crooked or stupid" and leaving

Ukraine‘s president Zelenskyy in an interview with Skynews disclosed that Russian oligarch Roman Abramovich came to Kyiv, Ukraine. This secret meeting took place recently and Zelenskyy made clear that Ukraine is not going to surrender any parts of Ukraine, including Donbas. Zelenskyy said that the only compromise he is willing to take is an unconditional ceasefire. This are interesting news. Abramovich would have never come to Kyiv if this wasn’t sanctioned by Putin. In other words, Putin blinked.