IRAN’S SEARCH FOR SURVIVAL AND WAR TERMINATION IN 2026
Is this unfair to world powers? What, precisely, is the responsibility of the other powers, great and small, to US-Israeli aggression and their joint proposal for unchallenged Israeli military primacy in the Middle East?
In a functioning great power system, the great powers would immediately convene and sort out a deal to restore peace and the survival of the fossil economy that feeds the whole planet.
Any such deal would include a formula — explicit or implicit, but regardless reflected in the military postures and response functions of the powers that jointly underwrite the international order — for the security of the state that has been attacked; justly or unjustly, both would be of great interest to the powers.
Any serious statesman or diplomatist of the more civilized system of the European great powers, jus publicum europaeum, would tell you that unless the security of the state under attack can be guaranteed, that state can hardly be asked to submit to the international system — for otherwise, the alleged outlaw state is justus hostis for the international system tout court.
When I say the Iranians are not going to listen to China or Russia short of substantial military support, I want to suggest that the Iranians are not listening to anything other than solutions to their problem of survival.
The problem of war termination will not be solved until the international community provides a formula for Iranian survival that passes the laugh test. Were China or Russia to airlift weapons and promise to rearm Iran with missiles and drones, that would persuade the Iranians to cease fire in my judgement.
Short of that what can they offer? It’s not like the Iranians have no plan to win the war. They are going to make Trump pay such a high price that future presidents, himself included, will think twice about considering the idea ever again.
They know what they need to do to impose intolerable costs on Trump and the international community. They just need to keep Hormuz closed and sustain their attacks for long enough to politically cripple Trump.
According to my calculations, Iran will be able to sustain fire and keep Hormuz closed for many months, if indeed not years. One day of oil above $100 and he resorted to panicked market diplomacy. This leads me to the thesis that while he may have high risk appetite, he does not have high pain tolerance. But we are playing Mercy here.
The problem of Iranian security has been triggered by the joint Israeli-American proposal for a Middle East ruled by Israel. Iran’s security problem in the context of war termination, is to deter a future US-Israeli attack.
Iran is all ears for solutions to this problem. But there is no one in the international system who has stepped up to solve this problem. Unless this problem is effectively addressed by the international system, I don’t see how Iran can be prevented from crashing the world economy.
“Parliament Speaker Mohammad-Bagher Ghalibaf declared that Tehran is “absolutely not seeking a ceasefire,” arguing that Israel sustains its position through the recurring cycle of “war–negotiation–ceasefire and then war again.””
But what is a workable solution here? Who, in this whole world, can issue any guarantee against Israeli aggression?
I’m afraid this a total ceasefire is simply beyond what the international system is capable of at this point.