Why is this on 3d-bbc•co•uk 😭😭😭 yes, a hyphen, not a dot! Not a subdomain like 3d•bbc•co•uk When scrolling past this, I even read it as 3d•bbc•co•uk, which is why this domain is especially dangerous. Domains like this make phishing easier for threat actors — they don't have to try as hard when choosing a domains. People can't read URLs properly already, but we're constantly told to read the URL. How can we do that with this? I get that this is an experiment, probably the work of an overachieving employee working in their spare time. It could be developed by a third party. But organisations need to run these sorts of things on a unified microsite domain. Google does this using withgoogle•com: experiments•withgoogle•com, buildyourfuture•withgoogle•com… Meta does it with atmeta•com: investor•atmeta•com, datacenters•atmeta•com, communityforums•atmeta•com… This domain pattern clearly demarcates trust boundaries while unifying your domain estate, because you'll probably forget about 3d-bbc•co•uk in a few years and it will be registered by someone else. But most importantly, since 3d-bbc•co•uk is legitimate, it gives threat actors confidence to effortlessly register domains like this, to phish users of the BBC and other orgs, and consumers won't bat an eyelid. They won't spot the bad domain. They'll use claims to authority in the bad email to gain misguided trust. It's a slippery slope. Domains like this weaken trust and our collective defence.

The World Cup starts tonight! ⚽️ But by the end of the first match, we’ll be one man down. Someone dies by suicide in our country every 90 minutes. Three-quarters of these are men. I spoke with Luke the co-founder of @andysmanclubuk about male suicide, mental health and the help that is out there. 👇 Andy's Man Club is an incredible organisation that helps men across Britain open up, talk about what is going on in their lives, and help one another. I have been to sessions in my constituency and was overwhelmed by the support they can offer men dealing with all sorts of problems in their lives - small or large. In each session, a football is passed around the group to share thoughts, challenges, and successes. Simple, but effective and liberating! As a government, we take mental heath - and men's mental health - seriously. We published England’s first Men's Health Strategy last year, which committed further funding for suicide prevention programmes, recognising that suicide is one of the biggest killer of men under 50. We are investing £3.6 million in community based suicide prevention projects - and supporting the @premierleague Together Against Suicide initiative with @samaritans. And this is a challenge for all of us, not just government. As a society we can do more to encourage men to open up, get the weight off their shoulders. That is a key part of our Men and Boys work led by @DavidLammy - amplifying the issues, assuring folk there is help out there. Enjoy the football, look out for one another, and know there is support out there!

They’ve been having a debate over whether it’s Your Party or Our Party for months now

We already have capital gains tax, we put it up. We already have an Inheritance Tax, we put it up. We already have taxes on private jets, we put them up. We are busy making things fairer in the real world. Greens are busy planning how they'd crash the economy like Liz Truss all over again.

Thank you for the new ringtone, @TimesRadio.

Exclusive from @MaxKendix Eight Reform UK councils have indicated that they will raise council tax next year after struggling to find huge cuts in public spending Durham, Warwickshire, Leicestershire, Derbyshire, Staffordshire, Lancashire, Lincolnshire and Kent are all looking at council tax rises Reform leaders have faced similar problems to other councils in providing for the spiralling cost of children’s and adult social care, which accounts for about two-thirds of budgets thetimes.com/uk/politics/art…

Powerful interview with @AshleyDalton_MP. If you only read one thing today make it this. Very much worth your time. We are so lucky to have her @DHSCgovuk. thetimes.com/article/e73d70f…?

Here's an extract from my @spectator piece, 'The truth about the Fabian Society': "It’s a strange feeling finding out that you have been part of a revolutionary group that secretly controls Britain and, er…didn’t realise it. For four years in the 1990s I was the Research Director of the Fabian Society. It was a wonderful job, at a time when Labour under Blair was open to new ideas and policies and, as a Labour-affiliated, mildly left-of-centre organisation, the Fabians were very well placed. Earnest thinkers, networkers and youngsters finding their feet in politics all had a space in which they could come together and think about and discuss politics and ideas in an environment where questioning the received wisdom was the point, rather than a political crime. I had a ball, suggesting such heinous ideas for Labour to adopt as getting the NHS to work with private providers to increase the supply available to patients, and giving parents and others the ability to come together and create new schools. I wonder what happened… We produced all sorts of papers, including the Southern Discomfort series that, if I say so myself, is still talked about today. Before the 1997 landslide, if you drew a line between the Wash and the Bristol Channel then Labour held a dismal 3 seats outside London. We held a series of focus groups among swing voters in 5 marginal seats to find out what was preventing them backing Labour. The answers were a checklist of what became New Labour. John Prescott, rather wonderfully, went on the airwaves to dismiss the research, saying “you might as well go into a pub and ask people”. Well, yes. But according to much of social media at the moment, I missed the true purpose of @thefabians. For Alex Phillips, a presenter on Talk Radio, the Fabians are part of “the destruction of The Western World.” Other posters tell us to, “Imagine an enemy that doesn't declare war. An enemy that doesn't storm the gates but is invited into the halls of power. An enemy wearing the face of a friend”. Another describes “the Fabian Cabal that runs our politics and our administrative deep state.” I won’t go on – if you want to get the full force of these spasms of derangement, have a look at this: youtube.com/watch?v=o6TKF94t… The origin of these conspiracy theories about the Fabian Society secretly running Britain which have suddenly sprung up is the appeal court ruling in the Epping Forest asylum seekers’ hotel case. Some genius ‘discovered’ – although it has never been hidden – that the senior judge, Lord Justice Bean, had been a member of the Fabian Society. Not just a member but, for a year, the chair. A lefty! Outrage! One barrister has reported Sir David to the Judicial Conduct Investigations Office for not recusing himself. Who knew that some lawyers have been involved in politics, eh? So – shocker - some judges have previously expressed political views when they were lawyers. As judges, they put those views aside and rule on the law. And if they don’t, they are overruled. No one – rightly - seems to have been bothered that the original judge in the case had been a Conservative parliamentary candidate. As it happens, David Bean, as he then was, was chairman of the Fabian Research Committee to which I reported. We disagreed on much. But you could not find a more intellectually open, decent or honourable man. I can hardly imagine a man more suited to the bench, who is as far from the caricature of a lefty activist judge as it's possible to find. But no sooner had Lord Justice Bean’s shameful past as the chair of an organisation which discussed left-of-centre policy emerged than it was then ‘revealed’ that more than half the Cabinet, and a very large number of public figures, are also, today, members of the Fabian Society. It’s such a secret that the Fabians, as any successful membership organisation would do, boasts about its membership on its website. And it’s so secretive a cabal that anyone can join online. You get “access to fantastic political debates in every corner of the country, along with: Our flagship quarterly magazine, the Fabian Review – sent to your home. At least four reports or pamphlets posted to your home each year, with dozens more available on our website. Invitations to Fabian conferences and events across the country, including reduced price admission for ticketed events. Access to the meetings of around local Fabian Societies in every corner of the country. Members who are not already Labour Party members become affiliated supporters of the party, with voting rights.” You don’t, however, get training in destroying the West or infiltrating public bodies. For the £5.90 a month that membership costs, that’s a bit much to expect. Does it matter that so many people online seem to think that membership of a harmless, worthy and – truth to tell – slightly dull organisation is in fact evidence of a secret society that is bent on subverting the West? No more than any more of the wacky conspiracy theories that are the meat and drink of the online world. But it is evidence of at least one thing: the drip, drip, drip delegitimisation of our institutional norms through willingness of all sides of the divide to accept anything, no matter how bonkers, if it provides a political dopamine hit. spectator.co.uk/article/the-…

There’s always a tweet

🔶 "Conservatives can't win here!"

A damning indictment of the Westminster lobby that @mcgregormt has just landed the political story of the year in a Norwich City fanzine: Minister for Sport @Steph_Peacock eats steak pie *with a Bovril on the side* alongcomenorwich.com/article…

Weird they didn’t think of this before

When your new party launch is going really well:

Arriverderci, it’s one on one 👋

Blackburn Rovers academy graduates have scored for England in every game of this Euros so far (Keira Walsh, Georgia Stanway, Ella Toone). But the club owners have taken a voluntary minimum-two tier relegation because they don’t think @RoversWFC are worth funding.

Mad that the Netherlands are managed by Jonathan Pie

Cool, but what does this have to do with the Tucker-Cruz interview?