This is an amazingly written piece.
Notice I didn't say it was a good piece, I said it was amazingly written.
Do you remember that scene from "My cousin Vinny?" Where they're talking to the two kids in custody, and Vinny is explaining how he's going to win the case?
--
He's going to show you the bricks. He'll show you they got straight sides. He'll show you how they got the right shape. He'll show them to you in a very special way, so that they appear to have everything a brick should have. But there's one thing he's not gonna show you.
[turns the card, so that its edge is toward Billy]
When you look at the bricks from the right angle, they're as thin as this playing card. His whole case is an illusion, a magic trick. It has to be an illusion. Nobody - I mean nobody - pulls the wool over the eyes of a Gambini. ESPECIALLY this one.
---
The mother Jones showed you a bunch of bricks. A bunch of cases of self-defense claims involving white and black people.
What they don't show you is the edge of the card, that all of these cases might involve self-defense claims, but the actual evidence is all different.
Trayvon Martin wasn't in any danger but he assaulted someone by slamming their head into the pavement.
Calling Jordan Neely "innocent" is a stretch. The guy was having some kind of psychotic episode screaming And yelling about how he was going to hurt people.
Quoting tariq nasheed, one of the worst race grifters on social media is about as responsible as quoting the my pillow guy on facts regarding election integrity.
Comparing the case to Kyle Rittenhouse is also hilarious, because Rittenhouse was assaulted, by white people.
As soon as you take a look at the arguments in this mother Jones article, the cards they present are just as thin as a deck of playing cards, and not bricks at all.