I genuinely hate to pull rank, and I've never done this on X, but I've had enough of patronising little whelks like Lukas. I'm trying to tell him that economics and social science in general need an interdisciplinary approach. He tells me to 'write something'. Good heavens. Sorry, but for once only, I'm forced to show off.
He has 101 citations in one discipline and an h-index of 7. I have 5,392 citations across multiple disciplines with a h-index of 35, and 35,936 peer/student reads on
academia.edu, which puts me in the top 1% of global scholars. My PhD was an investigation of social and economic history through a psychological/criminological lens, in which I first explored the interdisciplinary approach I have developed since.
I ran two businesses in the 70s and lived through the catastrophic deindustrialisation process. My academic and experiential knowledge of social and economic history suggests rather strongly that economists' current DSGE models are poor tools for analysis, prediction and policy. If you want to find out about more sophisticated system-dynamics models currently under development, I'm not the expert, follow
@RelearningEcon and
@ProfSteveKeen, and for some political and policy implications follow
@RichardJMurphy and dip into some
@CheeseMacro podcasts.
In my long career I've supplied social science with three original concepts, and encouraged my research partners such as
@winlow_s and
@Thomas_Raymen to supply more. I've lost count of my articles and I've written 11 books. But the kid who tells me to 'write something' clings onto an orthodox paradigm and makes a living parroting its findings, which for him gives him some sort of authority over others who might disagree. This is how obsolete paradigms reproduce themselves. They capture people young and turn them into arrogant, unthinking priests.
x.com/AltermattLukas/status/…
You cannot simultaneously claim you know how the world works and that we are not ready for models. Your claims are based on implicit models, so either write them down and engage with the profession, or remain sitting at the children‘s table.