NEW: US, Iranian, and diplomatic sources have published contradictory reports about the details of the draft US-Iran memorandum of understanding (MoU). The conflicting reports indicate that there is significant disagreement between the two sides as well as within Iran.
IRGC-affiliated media published a version of the MoU that would be tantamount to a US surrender and includes all key Iranian demands, including “management” of the Strait of Hormuz, the release of frozen Iranian assets, and a US-developed reconstruction plan for Iran. Top Iranian and US officials — including Iranian Foreign Affairs Minister Abbas Araghchi, US President Donald Trump, and US Vice President JD Vance — disputed the accuracy of these reports.
An ultra-hardline Iranian parliamentarian said that the deal strips Iran of its ability to collect fees or manage traffic in the strait, which indicates that some ultra-hardliners also believe that the IRGC-affiliated media reports about the details of the agreement are incorrect.
US sources have also suggested that Iran would make concessions under the draft MoU. A US official speaking to CNN claimed that the draft MoU includes provisions to dismantle Iran’s nuclear program and end Iranian support for the Axis of Resistance. Most other reports have stated that Iran and the United States would negotiate nuclear issues during a 60-day period after the signing of an agreement. Iran has consistently sought to strip the United States of its leverage—such as the US blockade—before entering nuclear negotiations.
ISW-CTP will provide further analysis about the negotiations in its June 12 update.