🔎 Recap: Mainnet Lite vs Mainnet Full
A quick recap on how we currently think about Mainnet Lite versus Mainnet Full.
🔹 Mainnet Lite
Mainnet Lite is the more practical and controlled L2 path.
The current direction is:
- built around the
@Arbitrum L2 path
- more heavily backed by dedicated nodes in the earlier stage
- simpler and more productized as an initial rollout shape
- useful as the earlier hosted / demonstration-style path before broader expansion
Reference path:
- Testnet0 →
dashboard-testnet0.cortensor…
🔹 Mainnet Full
Mainnet Full is the fuller Cortensor-native path.
The current direction is:
- built around the
@Arbitrum Orbit L3 setup
- closer to the broader long-term Cortensor network shape
- more aligned with the fuller infra / protocol direction beyond the lighter L2 rollout path
Reference path:
- Testnet1a →
dashboard-testnet1a.cortenso…
🔹 Why both matter
These two tracks are related, but they are not trying to do the exact same thing at the exact same stage.
The rough framing is:
- Mainnet Lite = L2-first, simpler rollout, more dedicated-node-heavy path
- Mainnet Full = fuller L3-native Cortensor path
🔹 Current takeaway
So Mainnet Lite is the more controlled first step, while Mainnet Full remains the broader long-term network direction.
#Cortensor #MainnetLite #Mainnet #L2 #L3