๐ ๐ฎ๐ป ๐๐ถ๐๐โ๐ ๐ญ๐ญ๐ฑ ๐ฐ๐ต๐ฎ๐ฟ๐ด๐ฒ๐ - ๐๐ต๐ฎ๐โ๐ ๐ด๐ผ๐ถ๐ป๐ด ๐ผ๐ปโฆ
It seems that thereโs plenty of confusion surrounding the situation of Manchester Cityโs 115 charges for breaching Premier League rules and how it relates to their prior case with Uefa and CAS. Yet thereโs not much out there in the mainstream media explaining it in that much detail.
As such, I thought it might be helpful to provide a rough summary answering some of the most common questions about it all.
Note: since I drafted all this, the BBC has released a similar version of FAQs about the case which can be found here:
bbc.co.uk/sport/football/artโฆ
The below also has some information that the BBC did not elaborate upon though.
๐งต1/n
๐ช๐ต๐ฎ๐ ๐ต๐ฎ๐ ๐ ๐ฎ๐ป๐ฐ๐ต๐ฒ๐๐๐ฒ๐ฟ ๐๐ถ๐๐ ๐๐ (๐ ๐ฎ๐ป ๐๐ถ๐๐) ๐ฏ๐ฒ๐ฒ๐ป ๐ฐ๐ต๐ฎ๐ฟ๐ด๐ฒ๐ฑ ๐๐ถ๐๐ต?
Following an investigation by the Premier League, Man City has been charged with 115 counts of breaching Premier League rules:
- 54 counts of failing to provide accurate financial information
- 14 failures to provide accurate details for player and manager payments
- 5 failures to comply with Uefa rules including FFP
- 7 breaches of Premier League PSR rules
- 35 failures to co-operate with Premier League investigations
๐ช๐ต๐ ๐๐ฒ๐ฟ๐ฒ ๐๐ต๐ฒ๐ ๐๐ป๐ฑ๐ฒ๐ฟ ๐ถ๐ป๐๐ฒ๐๐๐ถ๐ด๐ฎ๐๐ถ๐ผ๐ป?
In November 2018, German Publication โDer Spiegelโ released a story about how Man City had been subverting Profit and Sustainability Rules (PSR) and Financial Fair Play (FFP) rules. These rules, introduced in Uefa competitions in 2011/12 and the Premier League in 2012/13, prevented clubs from undertaking unlimited spending using debt or owner funds (known as equity). Instead, clubs were required to spend what they โearnedโ such as from matchday revenue, broadcast revenue or commercial deals, such as sponsorships.
The storyโs source was a cache of leaked emails that Der Spiegel had obtained between Man City executives, including the Chief Executive Office (CEO) and Chief Financial Officer (CFO).
The emails, which are numerous and took place over many years, go into precise detail about how Man City sought to subvert FFP rules by disguising equity payments from the owner as sponsorship revenue, by channelling the funds through their sponsorsโ accounts.
This formed the initial basis of investigations by Uefa and the Premier League. The accusation is that by disguising equity payments as sponsorship revenues, they would have subsequently misreported their financial accounts, hence the charges of failing to provide accurate financial information.
Uefa estimated that at least ยฃ204million of equity payments were disguised as sponsorship revenues which would also result in substantial breaches to PSR and FFP rules.
Subsequently, there were further reports that Man City paid players and managers โoff the booksโ, resulting in charges for failing to provide accurate details for player and manager payments, which would also have knock on effects for the above charges as well.
๐๐ฟ๐ฒ๐ปโ๐ ๐๐ต๐ฒ ๐ฒ๐บ๐ฎ๐ถ๐น๐ ๐ฎ๐น๐น ๐ณ๐ฎ๐ธ๐ฒ ๐ฎ๐ป๐ฑ ๐ฑ๐ผ๐ฐ๐๐ผ๐ฟ๐ฒ๐ฑ?
No.
Man City didnโt officially confirm or deny the authenticity of the emails during the Uefa investigation. However, Man City eventually released their own โoriginal versionsโ of some of the emails during one of the hearings.
The original versions of those emails matched the equivalent contents of the leaked emails. A few of the emails submitted by Man City as โoriginalsโ have been attached to this tweet.
๐ช๐ต๐ ๐ถ๐ ๐ถ๐ ๐๐ฎ๐ธ๐ถ๐ป๐ด ๐๐ผ ๐น๐ผ๐ป๐ด ๐๐ผ ๐ฏ๐ฒ ๐ฟ๐ฒ๐๐ผ๐น๐๐ฒ๐ฑ?
The nature of the accusation is complex and the Premier League lacks broad powers of investigation because it is not a Government body. It relies on its members to co-operate with investigations and provide the information that they request.
Man City sought to challenge the investigation over many years in the UK Courts of Law, thereby delaying the investigation and subsequent prosecution.