CryptoAmsterdam @damskotrades : Very good Altcoin charting in phases Bitcoin : @CryptoCon_ Bloodgood @bloodgoodBTC @bitcoinarchive @100trillionUSD @therationalroot @ChartsBtc @Bitcoin

In the 1970s, one man turned $5,000 into $15 million. No internet. No screens like we have. Just a computer the size of a room, and one rule he refused to break. His name is Ed Seykota. Here is the man, and the 5 rules behind it 👇

One of William O’Neil’s biggest edges wasn’t intelligence—it was preparation. Every weekend he would: • Review hundreds of charts • Analyze earnings growth • Study relative strength • Build a watchlist • Create a game plan for Monday

A stock spends 18 months building a beautiful base, then breaks out on monster volume. Runs 15%. And suddenly every trader on Earth develops an urgent need to own it immediately. ...where were you for the last year and a half? I like to think the breakout gets everyone excited, while the pullback tells you who actually understands what's happening. I'm waiting for volume to dry up, support to hold, and weak hands to panic because they bought the exact top of the breakout candle. What's funny is that the people who chase the breakout usually end up selling the pullback. The people who wait for the pullback usually end up owning the trend. 1) Patience is expensive EMOTIONALLY... 2) But chasing is expensive FINANCIALLY. Know the difference!

The Momentum Cycle

AMD CEO Lisa Su just killed Nvidia’s $4,000 AI box with a $1,499 lunchbox. She walked on stage, held it in one hand, and ran a 235 billion parameter model live. No data center. No cloud. No rented GPU. The chip inside is something nobody saw coming. AMD’s Ryzen AI Max 395 is the first x86 silicon where CPU and GPU share the same 128GB of memory. That single trick lets a desktop run models that used to need a server rack. Out of those 128GB, Linux hands the GPU 110GB to play with. For context, an RTX 5090 gives you 32GB. A 4090 gives you 24. This box gives you more than three times either of them, in a chassis the size of a thick paperback. The benchmark that broke the room: this chip beat an Nvidia RTX 5080 by more than 3x on DeepSeek R1 inference. A $1,499 lunchbox outrunning a $1,000 discrete graphics card on a real AI workload. Nvidia spent a decade convincing the world you needed their hardware for serious AI. AMD just put that on a desk for half the price. Here is what nobody is telling you. A heavy AI user right now pays $200 for Claude Code Max, $200 for ChatGPT Pro, $20 for Cursor, $20 for Gemini. That is $5,280 a year leaving your account. The box pays itself off in 9 months and then runs free for the rest of its life. Install Ollama. Pull Qwen3 235B. Point Claude Code at localhost. Same interface you already use, except now nothing leaves your machine, nothing costs per request, and no company throttles your usage at 3am when you finally have time to build. This is the moment every AI subscription becomes optional. Lawyers stop fearing OpenAI leaks. Developers stop watching the token meter. Founders stop renting H100s for prototypes that never ship because the bill scared them. The first thousand people to figure this out will own the next two years of private AI consulting. Save this, and read the full breakdown article below you are watching the next shift hit before everyone else does.

Two traders take the exact same trade. One walks away green. The other red. Mark Douglas spent years figuring out why. The answer was never on the chart ↓

Compounding is one of the most powerful forces in investing. A portfolio growing at 20% annually instead of 10% turns $100,000 into over $1.5 million versus just $418,000 after 15 years, a difference of more than $1.1 million. #Investing #Compounding #WealthBuilding $QQQ $SPX $SMH $MAGS $IWM

Ed Seykota turned $5,000 into $15 million. so i reverse engineered his five rules, coded it from scratch with Claude Code, and backtested it. new video breaking down everything (and if it still works): youtu.be/bLoBNKqUTIg?si=yPtq…

"If it's tedious to learn, it isn't a passion...you're not in the right lane."

SpaceX's 11th employee just became a billionaire. Gwynne Shotwell joined SpaceX in 2002. She was employee number 11, joining as VP of Business Development before the company had proven a single rocket could fly. She didn't even go there looking for a job. She had taken a colleague to lunch to celebrate him leaving for SpaceX, ran into Musk at the restaurant, and got interviewed on the spot. A week later, she joined him. Her job: sell rocket launches for a company nobody had heard of. She built the Falcon vehicle manifest to over $5 billion in commercial contracts. She managed SpaceX's growth to 22,000 employees. She was the one who told NASA, the Air Force, and paying commercial customers why SpaceX could get to orbit cheaper and faster than anyone before it. She was also the one who said no to going public for years. "I wasn't sure the company would go public," she said on CNBC yesterday. She resisted the pressure because she believed the public markets would force SpaceX into quarterly thinking, which would kill the mission. She finally decided it was time. "I do not want to focus on quarterly earnings," she said on IPO day. "What we're doing is very futuristic." Her stake is now worth north of $1.3 billion. She's SpaceX's fifth-largest Class A shareholder. The 24 years of operational work that made yesterday possible have Gwynne Shotwell's fingerprints on them.

Take Trading Seriously, It Will Make You RICH!

Most Valuable Companies In The World: 1/ $NVDA: $5.0T 2/ $GOOG: $4.4T 3/ $AAPL: $4.3T 4/ $MSFT: $2.9T 5/ $AMZN: $2.6T 6/ $TSM: $2.2T 7/ $SPCX: $2.1T 8/ $AVGO: $1.8T 9/ $2222.SR: $1.8T 10/ $TSLA: $1.5T

Don't just take my words as truth...go and backtest the 9week for yourself! A few examples of recent leaders from this cycle. Chart: $ARM, $SNDK, $MU.

If a leader is going to HOLD UP, it usually tells me right at the 9week. After studying prior leaders...over and over again, the biggest leaders of every cycle tend to respect the 9week during healthy uptrends. If you go back and study stocks like $ARM, $MU, $SNDK, or countless other recent market leaders, you'll notice something very, very interesting... after breaking out of large bases, they rarely move in a straight line. Instead, they advance, digest, pull back into support, find buyers, and then continue higher. More often than not, that support area ends up being somewhere around the 9week. That's why I pay so much attention to this area on leading names. The 9week is where I start asking questions: "Is this just normal profit taking?" or... "Is institutional demand beginning to disappear?" I do believe both questions answer different concepts. I've picked up that the majority of traders on X see a pullback and immediately assume something is wrong, but I often see PBs as an opportunity. If a stock has already proven itself as a leader, is part of a strong theme/group, and has been outperforming the market for weeks or months, a pullback into the 9week is usually the first place I become interested again an a range move. But here's the catch... I don't blindly buy the 9week. I STALK the reaction. Think about the psychology of buyers sellers... after a strong run, people begin taking profits. Short-term traders get nervous, weak hands start selling, and the stock pulls back into an area where institutions have previously supported price. Now the question becomes: "Do buyers show up again?" Simply put...that's what I'm watching. If a stock slices through the 9week with heavy selling pressure and can't reclaim it, I take note. If sellers push it into the 9week and buyers immediately begin defending the area, that makes my eyebrows perk. The REACTION matters MORE to me than the level itself. This is where my lower timeframe execution comes into play. Once a leading stock reaches the 9week, I immediately move down to the 15 30min TF. I'm looking for evidence that momentum is beginning to shift. Things like... > Undercuts and reclaims > 15/30 min bullish pivots > Intraday VWAP reclaims > Higher TF failed breakdowns > Higher lows starting to form > Buyers defending weekly support These are all clues that selling pressure may be exhausting itself. My favorite entries usually come when sellers flush price below an obvious level, trap late sellers, and then buyers step in aggressively to reclaim it. Once a 15 or 30min pivot forms, I can enter with a tight stop underneath the low and/or LOD. That's what creates the asymmetric opportunity. I'm not trying to buy because the stock is down. I'm buying because buyers are proving they're willing to defend an area (I'm watching) that already matters on the weekly chart. Something I've learned from studying hundreds of market leaders is that the best stocks often make it difficult to get in. They like to shake people out and create doubt. They pull back just enough to make people question the trend before continuing higher. IMO, the 9week is often where that battle takes place. Here's a SIMPLE process to backtest yourself: 1) Identify a leading stock with strong RS. 2) Wait for a PB into the 9week/50EMA confluence. 3) Monitor volume price behavior around support. 4) Drop down to the 15/30min charts. 5) Wait for buyers to prove they're stepping in. 6) Enter on a pivot high support reclaim. 7) Risk against the low and/or LOD. Don't just take my words as truth... give it a try yourself! This is the focus: to put myself in a position where risk is small, the trend is still intact, and institutions are potentially showing their hand again. That's why I love the 9week, and again it's not an entry signal by itself. It's an area of interest where some of the best "low-risk" opportunities in leading stocks tend to develop. I write all of this to say, watch the 9week! Charts: $INTC, $AMKR, $AEVA, $OUST.

Focus on First or Second Consolidation After the Base If you miss the base breakout, focus on the first or second consolidation after it.These are often the best opportunities because the stock has already shown strength but is still early in its move. Your risk is usually small, while the upside can be much bigger if the trend continues.

Potential 10x in 5 years 1. $OSCR 2. $IREN 3. $ZETA 4. $XPEV 5. $ASTS 6. $NBIS 7. $LMND 8. $RKLB 9. $AMBA 10. $CRWV What am I missing?

Most traders think a great chart pattern is enough. It isn't. The biggest winners usually combine: 1. Technical Pattern 2. Fundamentals 3. Story That's where the biggest stock winners come from. 👇

QUANTUM COMPUTING — The Full Sector Map. Every Play. One Post.

Moist Mango made 1.6 million dollars on a single Nvidia trade. He had blown up his account twice before that. The difference wasn't a better indicator or a secret setup. Here's what actually built the big money ↓

HOW THE SPACE BIG 4 STACK UP 1. $SPCX (The Backbone of Orbit) • 3-year revenue CAGR 67% trading at 120x 2029 net income • Handles ~90% of global payload mass to orbit with 10.3M Starlink subscribers across 160 countries 2. $RKLB (Vertically Integrated Defense Prime) • 3-year revenue CAGR 30% trading at 80x 2029 net income • Second-most-launched US rocket operator with 50 successful Electron flights & $2.2B contracted backlog 3. $ASTS (Tower in the Sky) • 3-year revenue CAGR 156% trading at 11x 2029 net income • Nearly 60 MNO partners covering 3B subscribers targeting ~45 BlueBird satellites in orbit by EOY 4. $PL (Eyes From Above) • 3-year revenue CAGR 25% trading at 105x 2029 net income • Daily imaging of Earth's entire landmass with a $900M backlog & 116% net dollar retention