Women. That's the answer you're looking for. Women. It is women who want young people to remain single. It is women who want young women, in particular, to believe that a husband-free, child-free existence driven by nothing more than proximate hedonia is living-your-best-life. To disambiguate: women do not want themselves to become sex-addled, girl-bosses who reset their body-count with each abortion. They want other women to become sex-addled, girl-bosses who reset their body-count with each abortion. It's called manipulative female reproductive suppression. It's one way women compete for reproductive success and in crumbling civilisations, it's the primary way. Women invest much of their time and energy in creating a social environment that is maximally hostile to reproductive success. Many of their rivals fail to reproduce. Evolutionarily, this is a death sentence: an extinction level event for each non-reproducing woman's genetic lineage. The women who are unhappy are the women losing the battle for their lineage's survival. They know something is not right, but they don't know how to fix it. And feminism - the primary ideological vehicle of female reproductive suppression - is working overtime to ensure that they never figure it out.

Isn’t it funny how gynecentrism wants to label the most beneficial and competitive “low end prostitution” as immoral and degenerate. Yet promotes the least competitive, most controlled, least mutually beneficial prostitution marriage, as “moral” choice.

How good of an argument do you think it is that "BTC has never been through a real recession"? Do people that say that suggest that the government responses to the C19 scam don't count? Honest question.

The difference between the men I know who hate talking to their women and the ones who love talking to their women, is that the former have partners who are rude and yappy conversationalists, and the latter have partners who are pleasant and know how to listen.

Even the term “prosocial” is framed around a gynocentric notion. Masculinity is what makes civilization possible. Especially an advanced civilization. And it’s Masculinity that protects it (or used to). Men, in general, ARE prosocial (pro-society), as it is them who built society. Female kindergarten ethics (“be nice” “don’t hit”, etc.) is decidedly anti-social as evidenced by the second and third order consequence of their majority participation in civic life.

the wealth gap isn't caused by capitalism it isn't caused by technology it isn't caused by globalization it's caused by those closest to money creation capturing value before inflation spreads the cantillon effect explains inequality better than any political narrative

The typical young woman has been taught nothing but bullshit her entire life, by older women (who want her to ruin herself as quickly as possible so she isn't competition on the mating/marriage market) and by men (who won't tell her the truth because they want sex with her). She cannibalizes her SMV, not realizing it is front-end loaded, she lives it up while she can, then the music stops and she's left without a chair somewhere between 28 and 35. Then she just fades away after aging out.

When you teach women to act like men you make them doubly useless. Not only are they terrible at masculine things like politics, war, sports and leadership but now they don’t know how to cook, keep a home, raise children and be gentle or quiet. It’s a horrible situation.

Has anyone noticed that "bullying" is just a word used by kids who are either insecure and/or less competent? I realized this when I looked back and was picked on, but didn't focus on dwell on it because I was too busy moving on, achieving more, and leaving feelings behind.

Jordan Peterson once talked about why big families are better—you can’t helicopter parent, satefyism is eliminated, zero coddling. This happened for thousands of years and produced far healthier people than our modern psychotherapeutic Longhouse society.

Three things: 1. The Civil Rights Act of 1964 2. The Immigration and Nationality Act of 1965 (Hart–Celler Act) 3. Social Security Amendments of 1965 (Created Medicare & Medicaid) This set the stage for Dispossession and Gerontocracy, both of which collapsed birth rates.

Whether people want that or not, TradCons preferences are never coming back because almost none of them have the cojones to hold women to traditional standards. Nearly all the TradCon rhetoric is about exhorting and shaming men into a one-sided arrangement where women have choices while men only have responsibilities.

NICE GUYS DON'T FINISH LAST because they're weak They fail because MODERN DATING VALUES STATUS over stability Even a "PERFECT" MAN is just a PLACEHOLDER until a HIGHER RANK appears This isn't about men failing It's about a MARKET where LOYALTY IS A LIABILITY and HYPERGAMY NEVER SLEEPS

They decided that millions of students and temporary foreign workers would be allowed into the country. Millions. The students were fake, the foreign workers took all the service jobs. Plus many criminals From India abused system. Why? Ask Davos.

You leveled up in an artificial and society-based metric that men never cared about in the first place. You bought feminism and are now complaining about the product. No refunds in the store of life.

You want to know why Slavic and Eastern European women are more "feminine" and approachable? Because at one point, that whole part of the world had a serious male shortage. That is the only reason. When straight males are in short supply, women start to lose a lot of entitlement. That is why you can meet an Eastern European girl who looks like a model and acts better than a typical Western Mid. Unless we start having a massive shortage of straight guys en masse, expect for female entitlement to keep getting worse every year.

This is true. Completely made up event imposing a marketing scam upon normal winter with corresponding “tests” and “preventatives” that were always statistical nonsense

Right on queue. Metals smoked with double digit drops while bitcoin is flat. Bearish sentiment for bitcoin is as bad as ever, as the BTC/gold ratio hit a major technical target and retested the 2017 high of 16. Hilarious that goldbugs were dancing on bitcoin's grave because 1 BTC fell to the same value as one POUND of gold. They'll never admit it, but that is a massive win for bitcoin. Gold, "the ultimate safe-haven", fell 16% intraday from yesterday's high. A bigger drop than bitcoin experienced on October 10th. Silver fell 39% from yesterday's high. A bigger drop than the entire bitcoin "bear market" in just one day. Remember, bitcoin had a larger market cap than silver within the last year. Now silver's market cap is 3X bitcoin's. Gold's market cap is over 20x bitcoin's. The potential for a pure play on digital monetary utility to outrun its analog competition is obvious. Digital successors do not merely take a portion of the old analog market. They consume it entirely, and then grow orders of magnitude beyond that. Blockbuster vs Netflix, radio vs streaming, landlines vs cell phones, newspapers vs internet news, etc. Bitcoin is that significant. Metals are laughably clumsy and costly to transact in comparison. Friction and additional costs at every step. I believe metals traders would be wise to trim some overweight metals positions and re-allocate to a technically superior store-of-value. Now on to the chart. I know, you think I'm crazy. But the setup is clean and it is years in the making. We should know by the end of March if this holds water. The upside potential, while mind-bending, is supported by the technicals. I know bitcoin is on the edge of its range here. It looks sketchy. But the range is still holding, and that is where the best risk/reward presents itself. Bitcoin has a spectacular track record of humbling anybody who bets against it over the long term. Bitcoin is not a generational opportunity. It is a once-in-a-millennium opportunity. It might make sense just to get some in case it catches on.

Does anyone know what happened to Scott Atlas? I haven't forgotten that Trump chose Birx and Fauci, two criminals, over him. Sad.

Missing covid and BTC basically DQ you from telling anyone about the future or having any big picture analysis. Do not listen to people who got these wrong, ever, if the topic is complex or meaningful.