Joined January 2020
5,508 Photos and videos
Pinned Tweet
cette vidéo a 2 ans, toujours d'actualité, pourtant ces termes sont visiblement toujours autant amalgamés et non/mal compris #blockchain #Crypto #Decentralized youtube.com/watch?v=utBN-cSm…
3
4
18
19,404
DocMarmott retweeted
Les meilleures opportunités sont celles dont personne ne parle.
15
40
344
12,529
DocMarmott retweeted
‼️ UPDATE: It just doesn't stop: Almost 900 Arch Linux packages infected now. lists.archlinux.org/archives…

🚨 BREAKING: More than 400 Arch Linux User Repository packages have been compromised with infostealer malware and a rootkit. Attacker posed as a trusted maintainer and "adopted" orphaned packages. Arch maintainers are purging infected packages now. Audit your AUR installs.
184
843
5,557
965,185
Pour fêter ça, @MiningTk va craquer une allumette 😁
La récolte de satoshis 💸 du mois de mai a été effectuée 😊 504 596 satoshis ont été ajoutés aux tirelires 🔥 #WASAT
2
9
4,020
DocMarmott retweeted
Botanix va fermer ses portes. Si jamais vous avez fermé là-bas, récupérez vos fonds ! (Ça enchaîne en ce moment les écosystèmes qui ferment)
It is with a heavy heart that we announce we are winding down the Botanix network. This decision is the hardest one we have made in four years, and we want to share the reasoning openly because the people who backed us, built with us, and used what we shipped deserve more than a quiet shutdown notice. First off, an immediate practical consideration for the Botanix community: please withdraw your Bitcoin and other assets before July 9th, 2026. When we started in 2022, the pitch was simple enough to say in a sentence: bring real utility to Bitcoin. What that actually meant in practice, and what we have spent nearly four years building toward, was more ambitious than that sentence made it sound. We were trying to build a Bitcoin-based blockchain that could find genuine product-market fit as a platform for Bitcoin applications, without using token incentives to drive growth, manufacture users, or simulate utility. Almost every chain that has launched in the last cycle has reached for the same playbook (issue a token without PMF, engineer the incentive surface, point at the resulting metrics), and we did not believe this route is a viable strategy in the long term. We wanted to know whether a Bitcoin chain could earn its users on the strength of what was built on top of it, the value it brings in the market with Bitcoin itself as the only meaningful economic primitive in the system. And we built it. The Spiderchain went live and stayed live, a year of mainnet operation with one hundred percent uptime and zero security incidents on a genuinely novel cryptographic architecture. We built Dynafed, a dynamic federation that turned the Spiderchain from a static multisig set into a rotating, decentralized one, the technical milestone that most people in this space said could not be built on Bitcoin without compromising trust assumptions. Twenty-five million transactions, two hundred thousand wallets, and tens of millions of dollars in assets moved across the chain, every single number of that earned organically without a token, without airdrops, without points programs, or any of the manufactured-demand machinery. Chainlink, Morpho, GMX, Dolomite, Fireblocks, Alchemy, Galaxy, OKX Wallet, all integrated. We shipped a Bitcoin neobank with BINK on iOS and Android, with self-custodial email login for Bitcoin (something that had never existed before), native Bitcoin yield, and the lowest borrowing rates against Bitcoin anywhere in the world, all of it downstream of owning the infrastructure. The point of saying this is not to argue with our own conclusion. The protocol works, the product works, and our team and ecosystem worked in concert to do exceptional work. We have run this experiment in earnest, with a working protocol, real applications, and a serious team, for over a year on mainnet and nearly four years in total. The honest answer we have arrived at, after living inside it every day, is that it did not work, at least not in this market and not on this timeline. We want to share what we think we learned, with the caveat that some of this is conviction and some of this is still suspicion, and we would rather be transparent about the difference than pretend to have clarity we do not have. The first thing I've had to sit with is timing. Bitcoin utility, making Bitcoin programmable, productive, and integrated into real financial activity, isn't where the real world users sit right now. The conversation is still on Bitcoin as a reserve asset, on its monetary and political positioning, on base-layer conservatism. Those questions are upstream of the ones a Bitcoin L2 needs people to be asking. I still believe Bitcoin gets there, but belief in the destination is not the same as being able to predict when, and nobody can. It's also possible the destination never materialises at all, and that Bitcoin's role as a reserve asset is simply where it settles. If that's true, there will never be a market for what we were building, and no amount of time or capital would change that. The second is the token question. We intended to eventually launch a token. We saw it, and still see it, as a genuinely new form of equity, something closer to an IPO than an airdrop, to be done when you reach product market fit and the moment is right. That moment never came. What became clear over the last year is that the market largely stopped rewarding even the more considered versions of that playbook. Token launches across the board have broadly underperformed, and those that did go to market with tokens haven't seen the outcomes or PMF that the model is supposed to produce. The third lesson is about where DeFi demand on Bitcoin actually lives. For most use cases that exist today, lending, yield, leveraged exposure, WBTC on a mature general-purpose L2 is genuinely sufficient. Users have voted with their behaviour, and the verdict is that the trust assumptions of a wrapped representation on Ethereum are acceptable to almost everyone who wants Bitcoin-denominated DeFi. Decentralisation matters to people in principle and in conversation; in practice, when something cheaper and easier is in front of them, they use it. The security case for a dedicated Bitcoin L2 is real, but it only matters for a narrower band of applications than our thesis required, one of the clearer lessons this market has taught us. The fourth lesson is structural. The on-chain economy is consolidating around venues that own the user relationship: Hyperliquid, Robinhood, the major CEXes, and now TradFi participants absorbing an ever-larger share of attention, flow, and revenue. Convenience and institutional credibility win, every time, as soon as they're available. As retail participation thins, that concentration only deepens. We were, and still are, believers in decentralisation, but the current direction of on-chain growth is running through distribution, and any team building base-layer infrastructure today is rowing upstream against that current. We were no exception. The fifth lesson is the most concrete. Both of the above played out directly in our economics. The users we attracted were primarily using Bitcoin as a store of value for yield, a legitimate use case, but not the high-frequency transaction volume that drives fee revenue on a network like ours. BINK was our answer to that: a Bitcoin neobank designed to bring daily usage of BTC and stablecoins on-chain, driving the transaction volume the network needed. It was the right strategic instinct, and one we never got the chance to fully test. BINK only landed on both app stores in the last few weeks, a product that by its nature could only be built once the underlying infrastructure was proven and live. When users choose the convenient option and economic gravity pulls toward distribution, what's left on a decentralised infrastructure layer is a user base that costs more to serve than it generates. Infrastructure costs are what they are, and the fee income never came close to covering them. If you would like to see how we were imagining a Bitcoin future and what we have been working on since September, feel free to download BINK and give it a spin: it’s a full-fledged self-custodial Bitcoin Neobank with email login, one click borrowing, a Lightning integration and more. App store: apps.apple.com/us/app/bink-b… Play store: play.google.com/store/apps/d… This UX is where we think Bitcoin is ultimately heading towards although it feels too early. You can use invite code 1SD31R, but remember to remove your funds by July 9th. We could keep going. We have chosen not to, however, because continuing past the point where additional time stops producing additional learning is not conviction, it is something that looks like conviction from the outside while corroding into something else on the inside. We would rather stop now, with integrity intact and resources available to take care of the people who took a chance on us, than push the experiment past the point where it still has something to teach us. Reminder: Please withdraw all your assets by July 9th. After this, the federation will sweep the remaining Bitcoin. Any other assets or tokens on the network from then onwards will unfortunately be unrecoverable. After this, the federation will sweep the remaining Bitcoin. Any other assets or tokens on the network from then onwards will unfortunately be unrecoverable. To our investors, who backed a thesis that was harder to defend than it should have been, to our partners who built alongside us and bet pieces of their own roadmaps on ours, to the developers who deployed on Spiderchain, to our users and the BINK community who showed up for something experimental and stayed, and most of all to the Botanix team who shipped a genuinely novel system with rigour and care and who made every hard day worth the difficulty: Thank you, more than the words available here can carry.
1
1
4
1,587
J'espère du fond du cœur que personne n'a écouté/pris au sérieux ce fou. 🫣
« Je vous ai dit de ne jamais vendre votre Bitcoin. Je n’ai jamais dit que moi, je ne vendrais pas de Bitcoin. » Quel honte
2
1
7
1,633
DocMarmott retweeted

4
13
1,146
Qu'est-ce qui pourrait mal se passer ? 🫣
🤔 « Payez QUICONQUE pour faire QUOI QUE CE SOIT. » ➡️ @Pumpfun lance GO, une plateforme de primes permettant à n’importe quel utilisateur de créer ou accomplir des missions rémunérées.
4
11
3,510
Si tu sens une grosse odeur de transpi, c'est probablement que t'es à côté de Tom Lee 😅😂😋
#PeckShieldAlert The address 0x34d1...4ac1 was liquidated for ~15K ethereum:native worth of collateral ($24M) after ethereum:native fell below $1,600. It still holds a position with 31.5K $WETH supplied & 38M $USDT borrowed, worth ~$11.84M.
1
5
1,300
DocMarmott retweeted
La faille Orchard a exposé le problème structurel de #Zcash : - Une vulnérabilité de soundness dans le circuit zero-knowledge a permis pendant quatre ans la création potentielle de ZEC contrefaits illimités et indétectables dans le pool shielded, et les propriétés de confidentialité ont rendu impossible toute vérification cryptographique de l’absence d’exploitation... obligeant aujourd’hui l’équipe à proposer des mécanismes additionnels de preuve d’intégrité du supply qui risquent d’entrer en contradiction avec le modèle de privacy maximal initial 🙃 Face à cela, #Monero démontre une solidité supérieure : - Son architecture intègre la confidentialité par défaut via ring signatures et RingCT directement sur la chaîne principale, sans pool shielded compartimenté, tout en maintenant une émission publiquement vérifiable, ce qui évite le risque d’inflation cachée à long terme et préserve une privacy cohérente sans nécessiter de modifications ultérieures contradictoires 😃 Privacy $ZEC vs $XMR
‼️🤖 Opus 4.8 sort le 28 mai... Le 29, un chercheur l’utilise et trouve une faille critique dans Zcash Orchard qui avait résisté à 4 ans d’audits experts Taylor Hornby (Shielded Labs) déploie un framework d’agents custom. L’IA repère une sous-contrainte dans la multiplication elliptique du circuit Halo2, permettant théoriquement des ZEC contrefaits illimités dans le pool shielded ! 1. Il construit un exploit complet en quelques heures 2. Divulgation responsable immédiate 3. Zcash patch en urgence via NU6.2 le 3 juin ➡️ Aucun dommage constaté (hors panique et correction du prix !) Premier cas public marquant où un modèle sorti la veille découvre une faille exploitable dans un système ZK de production !! L’ère de l’audit crypto assisté par IA est lancée et ça va secouer 🧹 à qui le tour ?...
3
3
22
2,962
Le comble, c'est que c'est point chez ZEC qui a longtemps été pointé du doigt.
🚨 Une faille critique dans Zcash aurait pu permettre de créer une quantité illimitée de $ZEC... sans que personne ne puisse jamais le détecter. Les développeurs de Zcash ont révélé qu'un bug présent depuis mai 2022 dans le pool Orchard permettait théoriquement de générer un nombre illimité de $ZEC. Il est impossible de prouver avec certitude que cette faille n'a jamais été exploitée. La vulnérabilité a été découverte le 29 mai par le chercheur Taylor Hornby et corrigée en urgence le 1er juin. $ZEC a chuté d'environ 30 % en 24 heures et Arthur Hayes a annoncé avoir vendu l'intégralité de sa position.
1
3
1,620
Très belle animation de Marius qui permet de comprendre comment BTC s'est inspiré d'ETH pour les L2 😆😋 non en vrai ça permet de comprendre que le seul L2 BTC qui sert à quelque chose c'est Lightning 😁 ou alors je force vraiment sur le troll et c'est mieux d'aller vérifier 😏
A map of Bitcoin and its scaling layers. The goal is simple: visualize how Bitcoin, the Lightning Network, and other L2 protocols interact with each other.
1
1
6
1,099
DocMarmott retweeted
🚨 LE CNC NE NOUS RÉPOND PAS : NOUS SAISISSONS LA CADA 🚨 Il y a plus d’un mois, après avoir consulté l’avis de nos followers, nous avons décidé de demander officiellement au CNC de nous envoyer l’intégralité de ses dossiers de subventions (acceptés et refusés). Le délai légal d'un mois est dépassé et nous n'avons reçu aucun document … 👉Nous avons donc saisi la CADA (Commission d'Accès aux Documents Administratifs) avant d’envisager un possible recours au Tribunal Administratif. Nous vous tiendrons informés de la suite.
78
1,677
4,466
46,215
DocMarmott retweeted
Stratégie incroyable d’Éric Larchevêque pour lever 8 millions d’euros : payer des influs TikTok et Insta pour diffuser des pubs où il se vante d’avoir beaucoup de BTC et une fortune estimée à 370 millions d’euros. Si BTC n’était pas déjà à $66k, ce serait un signal de top
54
19
310
228,371
Donc là je découvre qu'il y a un "stable" qui est back par un produit de Strategy 🫣
#PeckShieldAlert $sUSDat (the staked version of USDat, 100% backed by digital credit (STRC)) briefly experienced a ~7% dip below $0.93 before recovering to $0.98. @saturn_credit The market fluctuation followed the symbolic breaking of the "Never Sell" doctrine. @Strategy sold 32 $BTC (avg. $77,135, totaling $2.5M; 0.0038% of its 843k BTC holdings) to fund distributions. The company also sold 801,994 shares of common stock, raising $128.3M, in the same period.
3
10
2,521
en image, c'est plus parlant 😆 image de @boldleonidas
fun fact : Saylor il est plus doué pour faire dump BTC que le faire pump 😂
4
3
28
2,141
fun fact : Saylor il est plus doué pour faire dump BTC que le faire pump 😂
1
11
3,396
DocMarmott retweeted
👀 Et malheureusement, il est loin d’exagérer… 🤔 🇺🇸🦅🇫🇷 Sylvia Miami 🇫🇷🦅🇺🇸 👉 linkmix.co/20609370 #SylviaMiami #discernement #autonomie #espritcritique #seconddegre
6
71
397
5,277
DocMarmott retweeted
Dernière ligne droite pour le peerfunding PipeliNostr ! Avec plus de 50% déjà atteint 🥳 Partagez, Commandez, Offrez ! N'oubliez pas non plus la petite étoile sur le GitHub pour libérer le code du Nostributeur ! Il n'en reste plus beaucoup pour atteindre l'objectif ⭐️ 👇 Liens
1
6
14
953
🥳
BREAKING: Michael Saylor's 'Strategy' sold 32 Bitcoin worth $2.5 million.
3
6
824