I commend the intelligence community for retracting their 2023 report “Assessment of Anomalous Health Incidents.” This report mischaracterized the NIH study on anomalous health incidents (AHIs). Our research was not complete at the time of this report.  Nor was our study designed to determine whether a foreign adversary or external mechanism caused these health effects. Findings that individuals may have been coerced by persons outside of NIH into participating in our study are deeply troubling and may represent a serious breach of ethical and human subject protections. NIH research must always be voluntary and informed without exception. Those affected by AHIs have suffered greatly. The complexity of the brain means some effects may not be apparent using current technology, underscoring the need for continued scientific study and transparency. We will work in good faith with Congress to ensure accountability, integrity, and care for those harmed. @RepRickCrawford

EXCLUSIVE: Biden-Era Intelligence Assessments On Directed Energy Attacks or Havana Syndrome Rescinded @dnigabbard After Our 2025 Investigation Despite facing systemic resistance within the US intelligence community, an @ODNIgov official confirms Gabbard has rescinded two, Biden-era Intelligence Community Assessments (ICA) related to AHI's (Anomalous Health Incidents) or Havana Syndrome on Thursday in a memo sent to the entire Intelligence Community. The Biden-era assessments concluded it was very unlikely a foreign adversary or novel weapon was behind debilitating brain injuries among spies, diplomats, military operatives and civilians. @DNIGabbard committed to a new review after our 2025 independent investigation (posted again here) revealed progressive brain injuries and cases of brain cell death. - This fulfills Gabbard's promise to initiate a review of the assessments, make the findings public, and ensure the mistreatment and dismissal of those impacted by AHIs is never again tolerated. - In the memo, DNI Gabbard explains that "a substantive recall of these ICAs is necessary and appropriate due to concerns about analytic bias negatively impacting the objectivity and soundness of analytic judgments." - She goes on to detail several of the IC analytic “shortfalls” of the AHI ICAs, to include: — “Failure to use all available sources of intelligence information and selectively excluding intelligence and evidence which did not support the analytic conclusions” —“Mischaracterizing the contents and sources of the underlying information to support the analytic conclusions and suppress analysis of alternatives” —“Misrepresenting and omitting information necessary to understand the quality and reliability of underlying sources of intelligence” —“Inclusion and reliance on an ethically flawed medical study while omitting information critical of the study and its methodology” —“Limiting operations and intelligence collection to maintain an analytic line which relied on the absence of evidence.” -DNI Gabbard directed the Intelligence Community to take further action in the coming months to review this topic, ensure analytic integrity, and bring the truth to the American people. NOTE: In April 2025, we shared the story of Mike Beck and his wife Rita. Beck was a decorated counterintelligence officer who was hit by a directed energy weapon in 1996 while on assignment overseas. Diagnosed with a Parkinson's like syndrome, Beck passed away earlier this year. Because of Mike Beck's bravery, his wife Rita, and many whistleblowers who came forward, change is happening and accountability is possible.

EXCLUSIVE: Biden-Era Intelligence Assessments On Directed Energy Attacks or Havana Syndrome Rescinded @dnigabbard After Our 2025 Investigation Despite facing systemic resistance within the US intelligence community, an @ODNIgov official confirms Gabbard has rescinded two, Biden-era Intelligence Community Assessments (ICA) related to AHI's (Anomalous Health Incidents) or Havana Syndrome on Thursday in a memo sent to the entire Intelligence Community. The Biden-era assessments concluded it was very unlikely a foreign adversary or novel weapon was behind debilitating brain injuries among spies, diplomats, military operatives and civilians. @DNIGabbard committed to a new review after our 2025 independent investigation (posted again here) revealed progressive brain injuries and cases of brain cell death. - This fulfills Gabbard's promise to initiate a review of the assessments, make the findings public, and ensure the mistreatment and dismissal of those impacted by AHIs is never again tolerated. - In the memo, DNI Gabbard explains that "a substantive recall of these ICAs is necessary and appropriate due to concerns about analytic bias negatively impacting the objectivity and soundness of analytic judgments." - She goes on to detail several of the IC analytic “shortfalls” of the AHI ICAs, to include: — “Failure to use all available sources of intelligence information and selectively excluding intelligence and evidence which did not support the analytic conclusions” —“Mischaracterizing the contents and sources of the underlying information to support the analytic conclusions and suppress analysis of alternatives” —“Misrepresenting and omitting information necessary to understand the quality and reliability of underlying sources of intelligence” —“Inclusion and reliance on an ethically flawed medical study while omitting information critical of the study and its methodology” —“Limiting operations and intelligence collection to maintain an analytic line which relied on the absence of evidence.” -DNI Gabbard directed the Intelligence Community to take further action in the coming months to review this topic, ensure analytic integrity, and bring the truth to the American people. NOTE: In April 2025, we shared the story of Mike Beck and his wife Rita. Beck was a decorated counterintelligence officer who was hit by a directed energy weapon in 1996 while on assignment overseas. Diagnosed with a Parkinson's like syndrome, Beck passed away earlier this year. Because of Mike Beck's bravery, his wife Rita, and many whistleblowers who came forward, change is happening and accountability is possible.

1 of 6) On July 31, 2012 a Uruguayan newspaper, El Spectador, published this article.

Why aren’t people having children? “Animals don't breed in captivity.”

EXCLUSIVE: Biden-Era Intelligence Assessments On Directed Energy Attacks or Havana Syndrome Rescinded @dnigabbard After Our 2025 Investigation Despite facing systemic resistance within the US intelligence community, an @ODNIgov official confirms Gabbard has rescinded two, Biden-era Intelligence Community Assessments (ICA) related to AHI's (Anomalous Health Incidents) or Havana Syndrome on Thursday in a memo sent to the entire Intelligence Community. The Biden-era assessments concluded it was very unlikely a foreign adversary or novel weapon was behind debilitating brain injuries among spies, diplomats, military operatives and civilians. @DNIGabbard committed to a new review after our 2025 independent investigation (posted again here) revealed progressive brain injuries and cases of brain cell death. - This fulfills Gabbard's promise to initiate a review of the assessments, make the findings public, and ensure the mistreatment and dismissal of those impacted by AHIs is never again tolerated. - In the memo, DNI Gabbard explains that "a substantive recall of these ICAs is necessary and appropriate due to concerns about analytic bias negatively impacting the objectivity and soundness of analytic judgments." - She goes on to detail several of the IC analytic “shortfalls” of the AHI ICAs, to include: — “Failure to use all available sources of intelligence information and selectively excluding intelligence and evidence which did not support the analytic conclusions” —“Mischaracterizing the contents and sources of the underlying information to support the analytic conclusions and suppress analysis of alternatives” —“Misrepresenting and omitting information necessary to understand the quality and reliability of underlying sources of intelligence” —“Inclusion and reliance on an ethically flawed medical study while omitting information critical of the study and its methodology” —“Limiting operations and intelligence collection to maintain an analytic line which relied on the absence of evidence.” -DNI Gabbard directed the Intelligence Community to take further action in the coming months to review this topic, ensure analytic integrity, and bring the truth to the American people. NOTE: In April 2025, we shared the story of Mike Beck and his wife Rita. Beck was a decorated counterintelligence officer who was hit by a directed energy weapon in 1996 while on assignment overseas. Diagnosed with a Parkinson's like syndrome, Beck passed away earlier this year. Because of Mike Beck's bravery, his wife Rita, and many whistleblowers who came forward, change is happening and accountability is possible.

EXCLUSIVE: Biden-Era Intelligence Assessments On Directed Energy Attacks or Havana Syndrome Rescinded @dnigabbard After Our 2025 Investigation Despite facing systemic resistance within the US intelligence community, an @ODNIgov official confirms Gabbard has rescinded two, Biden-era Intelligence Community Assessments (ICA) related to AHI's (Anomalous Health Incidents) or Havana Syndrome on Thursday in a memo sent to the entire Intelligence Community. The Biden-era assessments concluded it was very unlikely a foreign adversary or novel weapon was behind debilitating brain injuries among spies, diplomats, military operatives and civilians. @DNIGabbard committed to a new review after our 2025 independent investigation (posted again here) revealed progressive brain injuries and cases of brain cell death. - This fulfills Gabbard's promise to initiate a review of the assessments, make the findings public, and ensure the mistreatment and dismissal of those impacted by AHIs is never again tolerated. - In the memo, DNI Gabbard explains that "a substantive recall of these ICAs is necessary and appropriate due to concerns about analytic bias negatively impacting the objectivity and soundness of analytic judgments." - She goes on to detail several of the IC analytic “shortfalls” of the AHI ICAs, to include: — “Failure to use all available sources of intelligence information and selectively excluding intelligence and evidence which did not support the analytic conclusions” —“Mischaracterizing the contents and sources of the underlying information to support the analytic conclusions and suppress analysis of alternatives” —“Misrepresenting and omitting information necessary to understand the quality and reliability of underlying sources of intelligence” —“Inclusion and reliance on an ethically flawed medical study while omitting information critical of the study and its methodology” —“Limiting operations and intelligence collection to maintain an analytic line which relied on the absence of evidence.” -DNI Gabbard directed the Intelligence Community to take further action in the coming months to review this topic, ensure analytic integrity, and bring the truth to the American people. NOTE: In April 2025, we shared the story of Mike Beck and his wife Rita. Beck was a decorated counterintelligence officer who was hit by a directed energy weapon in 1996 while on assignment overseas. Diagnosed with a Parkinson's like syndrome, Beck passed away earlier this year. Because of Mike Beck's bravery, his wife Rita, and many whistleblowers who came forward, change is happening and accountability is possible.

CIA Declassified Report on Russian AI and Cybernetics, 1964 #ufotwitter This is an incredibly fascinating document. It looks like a page from a declassified Western intelligence assessment (likely CIA, given the standard "Approved for Release" header format) analyzing Soviet capabilities in computing and advanced tech. The focus here is specifically on how the USSR was approaching what the West called "Artificial Intelligence" up to July 1964, though the Soviets themselves integrated these concepts under the broader umbrella of Cybernetics. Here is a breakdown of the key takeaways and the historical context of what this document is revealing: 1. The Terminological Split: AI vs. Cybernetics The preface highlights a distinct cultural and scientific divide in how the two superpowers framed the problem of machine intelligence: The Western View: Coined in the 1950s, "Artificial Intelligence" focused heavily on simulating "thinking" behavior, decision-making algorithms, and running these models on digital computers to assist human decision-makers. The Soviet View: The document explicitly notes that the USSR grouped these exact pursuits—pattern recognition, machine learning, planning, and brain modeling—under the term Cybernetics. Historical Context: This is highly significant because, under Stalin in the early 1950s, cybernetics was initially denounced by Soviet ideologues as a "bourgeois pseudo-science." However, by the late 1950s and early 1960s (the Khrushchev thaw), the Soviets completely reversed this stance. Cybernetics became a massive, state-sponsored scientific obsession, viewed as the ultimate tool to optimize the entire Soviet command economy and national strategic planning. 2. The Move Beyond "Conventional" Digital Computers One of the most forward-thinking observations in this 1964 assessment is the recognition that traditional digital hardware might not be the best fit for true artificial intelligence. The author notes: AI routines are often "more efficiently solved with other types of hardware." They predict the future will rely on analog or combined analog-digital (hybrid) equipment. They even anticipate neuromorphic computing, mentioning hardware that acts as "a replica of the structure of the human brain... on principles not yet uncovered." This shows that intelligence analysts were acutely aware that both Western and Soviet researchers were looking past basic digital mainframes to solve complex pattern-recognition and brain-modeling problems. 3. The Strategic Threat: Optimizing a "Monolithic System" The intelligence implications are made clear in the second paragraph. The analyst explicitly warns about the asymmetric advantage AI could give the USSR: "If it succeeds in significantly optimizing decision making in such complex areas as the economy or national strategic planning, it will obviously make a strong contribution to a relatively monolithic system, such as the Soviet one." In a decentralized capitalist economy, AI is distributed. But in a centralized command economy like the Soviet Union, a functioning "decision-making machine" or an automated economic planning system (like the later proposed OGAS network) could theoretically allow a monolithic state to manage its resources with devastating efficiency. This was a major underlying anxiety for Western intelligence. 4. Scope and Limitations of the Report The preface concludes by defining what the intelligence report actually covers: Included: Pattern recognition, machine learning, induction, and brain modeling based on Soviet open-source literature up to mid-1964. Excluded: It explicitly ignores standard, conventional digital computer process controls, choosing instead to focus purely on the "frontier" of Soviet cybernetic mind-modeling. It's a stark reminder that even in the early 1960s, the technological race wasn't just about hardware specifications or the sheer number of computers; it was a deeply ideological and strategic race to map, model, and automate the mechanics of thought itself. This is incredible i don't know what to say. cia.gov/readingroom/docs/art…

CIA whistleblower @JohnKiriakou "debunks" the 9/11 Truth movement.... Hard to argue with "it wasn't the aliens or lizard people" vm.tiktok.com/ZNdkYUKXX/

All of Robert McCreight's articles should be read. securitystudies.ecu.edu/wp-c…