Can someone explain how men parading around as grotesque female gender stereotypes is any different to grotesque black-face stereotypes? If you're a transvestite you'll be accepted more if you stop insulting women & develop your own dress sense that doesn't perpetuate misogyny.

“‘This case is not just about one app or one individual. It is about whether women in Australia still have the right to single-sex spaces based on biological sex… Reality and women’s rights must be properly upheld in law,’ Grover said in a statement.” Article 👇

Excerpt from the latest Gender Clinic News today. Professor of public ethics at Charles Sturt University Clive Hamilton “surveys the Australian scene, noting the mistreatment of dissenting psychiatrists Dr Jillian Spencer and Dr Andrew Amos”. We need more ethicists like this 👏🏻

Tickle paid nothing - not a cent - to lodge his AHRC complaint or run his litigation. Sall Grover, an ordinary mum (and extraordinary woman), has already had to raise over a million dollars just to defend herself and appeal. The High Court will cost even more. All because she refuses to lie: men are not women. Her crowdfunder is here: gigglecrowdfund.com/

📣📣📣Please subscribe to @Juanita30622990 YouTube channel. She needs 50 subscribers so she can live stream the Restore Women’s Right Rally ❌❌ on 4 July from Melbourne Australia- AKA the Trans Capital of Transtralia youtube.com/shorts/CurHFd5ep… via @YouTube

I'll never forget this. Doyle went on to slander me in a TV interview, and I'm told he did similar in print in his book. All because I dared to stick up for women whom he called "extreme", etc. for asking him to speak factually. May 17th, the night after his flounce.

Men. They're all men. It isn't convenient to call them anything other than 'Men'. It's confounding. It causes confusion. It isn't a harmless concession to refer to any of them as anything other than men. It's capitulation. It lends them justification to force the rest of us to go along with the lie. Judges don't have a strict word count that they must adhere to when hearing cases and delivering their decisions. Instead of 'convenience', we expect our Courts to prioritise precision and truth. Mr Tickle is a man who 'may' be protected by the provisions of the Sex Discrimination Act on the basis of his self-claimed 'Gender Identity' of 'Woman'. That's it. There is nothing anywhere that obliges anybody to call him anything other than a man, or to refer to him as a man. Until The Federal Court decision in Giggle v. Tickle. When Federal Court judges justify using trans lingo in the courtroom on the basis of 'convenience', it's worse than just laziness. It's an attempt to mainstream the ideological capture of their institution. It's clear the Federal Court has been captured. It's also obvious the Judges are determined to extend that capture to the rest of us through their own Decision in that case that punished @salltweets for using everyday precise language that has clear meaning. Language we have always used when referring to men. Language we learnt in the home and in our institutions of learning. The Federal Court is an activist institution that is an instrument of the State. It is being used in the service of a radical agenda. This is not a culture war. It is the imposition of a harmful anti-sex ideology that is destroying all women's rights and child safeguarding provisions in this country. #FireTheLiar

“Redefining what ‘woman’ means” in The Weekend Australian 🇦🇺 newspaper today.

“A former Family Court judge says it was “an extraordinary overreach” for the Federal Court to find that the ordinary meaning of “woman” includes a biological male who merely identifies as a woman in a decision now set to be challenged in the High Court.”

The Australian - Court ‘overreach’ in ruling on ‘a woman’ edition.pagesuite.com/popove… Friday, Jun 12, 2026

Giggle v Tickle A fabulous explainer explaining the unexplainable decision of the Full Court of the Trans Court of Australia, AUS/NZ - FQT May 2026 - Elizabeth Banham #WDI #FQT youtu.be/SDrZNc1H5KQ?is=s1Xx… via @YouTube

Left wing, middle class, modern day "feminism" Tell me when you either don't get it wrong or only speak out when it satisfies your classist political ideology #TheLeftHateWomen

💪 🧡🩷

🇦🇺 Gender Borg, Australia: ✍️ "...The institutions hollowing out women’s sex-based rights are not run by shadowy men in back rooms. "They are run, increasingly, by women: a majority-female federal Labor government, a public service that is 60 per cent women, a thicket of agencies where the gatekeepers of our rights are overwhelmingly female – and they all seem to sit on the same side of progressive politics..." By Stephanie Bastiaan @stephbastiaan 👇

The amazing Jasmine Sussex taking on the "men can breastfeed" crowd in Australia. Stunning that these are the battles women in the western world must fight in 2026.🤬

I are you listening now @AlboMP ?

“If you’re asking biological related questions about how safe it is for a biological male to take drugs in order to lactate to feed a baby - & I cannot believe we’re having this conversation - then that person says, you’re vilifying me…” Gender ideology gets even more insane 👇

A woman who actually did something incredible for women, and for this country. Subtly erased by MANna Cody's "potentially perceived pregnancy protections" for MEN.

🇦🇺 My mother, Pru Goward, was the Sex Discrimination Commissioner in Australia from 2001-2006 During her tenure she fought for paid maternity leave for women and won Here, she has some fresh words to say about the current commissioner Anna Cody 👇 (and the potential pregnancy of men 🤪) #SexNotGender #WomensRightsAreHumanRights #TranswomenAreConMen afr.com/politics/on-gender-t…