UK 🇬🇧 woman, mother and champion of good old common sense. Will catch up on my follows soon. I promise

Joined April 2010
7,252 Photos and videos
Pinned Tweet
27 Jun 2024
These are the people whom Starmer, Rayner, Sarwar, Sturgeon, Swinney, Yousaf and other virtue signallers want to reward by recognising their murderous kind of terrorist state.
Hamas Leader calls for a genocide against Jewish people worldwide. “We must attack every Jew on the face of the plane. How much is a Jews throat worth? 5 sheckles? Or even less. All of our people are ready to blow up.” This is why Israel must destroy Hamas.
1
9
25
10,809
Haitch7 retweeted
I say this as a parent who is genuinely in two minds on a social media ban because the risks to our kids are clear but the solutions aren't. Starmer's announcement is clearly a knee jerk attempt to do something popular as his authority crumbles. That's a dangerous background for making new laws.
Remember that most of the political journalists asking @Keir_Starmer questions at his press conference on the social media ban for under-16s are the same ones who failed to ask the right questions at Downing Stteet press conferences for 18 months during lockdowns. Why? Because they supported the lockdowns so they didn't bother questioning the evidence or the cost-benefit analysis. They largely back the social media ban so they won't do their job today either.
275
228
1,890
70,458
Haitch7 retweeted
Our schizophrenic government is giving the vote to people it doesn’t trust to be on social media in the evening.
🚨 NEW: Keir Starmer will introduce nightly social media curfews for 16 and 17-year-olds as part of the Government's social media ban [@thetimes]
144
1,039
7,743
244,621
Haitch7 retweeted
When you see a heated towel rail in your friend’s bathroom.
3
14
83
2,015
Haitch7 retweeted
This is like giving the child catcher from chitty chitty bang bang a children’s entertainment license.
🚨NEW: Bluesky will not be included in the under-16s social media ban
4
29
125
3,623
Haitch7 retweeted
'Yes Sir, I Can Boogie!' 🎶 Scotland fans party at Fenway Park! ⚾️🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿 #BBCFootball #FifaWorldCup
68
747
10,514
1,397,199
Haitch7 retweeted
John Swinney says he wants a "domestic approach" to implementing a Supreme Court ruling. What exactly does that mean? The Supreme Court has ruled. The SNP Government has said it accepts the ruling. There should be no special Scottish version of the law and no attempt to dilute or reinterpret what the Court has decided. Many will suspect this is John Swinney once again trying to keep Nicola Sturgeon's discredited self-ID agenda alive. Women and girls deserve clarity. The SNP should stop playing games and implement the ruling in full. heraldscotland.com/news/2619…
54
153
590
12,349
Haitch7 retweeted
BREAKING: Sean McGinty is speaking out and has revealed that BBC fired him after he criticized Hamas. Institution across the UK have been completely taken over by Islamism. Why is nobody sounding the alarm?
210
4,055
11,854
86,101
They must be made to answer why they’ve chosen to make this an exception to their ban
🚨NEWS: Suggestions have been made that a deal was struck for Bluesky to avoid the under-16 social media ban. Number 10 is yet to respond.
1
61
Haitch7 retweeted
The Jobs Did Not Disappear. They Were Rented To People Who Cannot Legally Work. 729,000 people aged 16 to 24 were unemployed in Britain between January and March this year. The youth unemployment rate, 16.2 percent, is the highest since early 2015. For the first time since records began in 2000, it is now higher than the EU average. Almost one million young people are not in education, employment or training, the highest figure in more than a decade. The explanation offered is economic headwinds. The cause is closer to home. Employer National Insurance contributions rose in April last year. The minimum wage rose with it. The sectors that have always absorbed young workers first, retail, hospitality, delivery, became the most expensive sectors to hire into. Job vacancies have fallen seven percent in a year, to their lowest level since April 2021. The pattern is simple. Raise the cost of hiring at the bottom of the market, and the bottom of the market stops hiring first. But the jobs have not disappeared. Walk down any high street and the delivery riders are still there, in greater numbers than ever. What has changed is who is doing the work, and how. At the Midland Hotel in Derby, a Grade II listed building housing around two hundred asylum seekers, a whistleblower described the daytime scene. The hotel is not busy, they said, because everyone is out at work. Delil, an Ethiopian asylum seeker staying there, put it plainly. "I work for Deliveroo like a lot of my friends. I want to work, that's why I came to the UK." This was documented in December 2023. Researchers at Nottingham Trent and Heriot-Watt found migrant couriers earning between £900 and £1,500 a month. The mechanism is a rental market. An account holder with the right to work registers with Deliveroo, Uber Eats or Just Eat, then rents access to that verified identity to someone who does not have it, for £70 to £100 a week. At the time, hundreds of such accounts were available on Facebook Marketplace. In the first quarter of 2025, almost 750 civil penalty notices were issued to companies for immigration breaches, the highest since 2016. The response came later. Deliveroo told MPs it had removed 105 riders since April 2024 for exactly this. In July 2025, the Home Office began sharing asylum hotel locations with the delivery firms, so they could flag accounts spending unusual time nearby. Asylum seekers are barred from working for their first twelve months. The data-sharing exists because, as Delil already said on the record, many already are. Robert Jenrick called the substitutes system a driver of illegal immigration that put public safety at risk, because the companies were not carrying out proper checks. He was right, eighteen months before anyone with the power to fix it agreed, and the underlying arrangement, an entry-level job performed by someone the law says cannot hold it, accessed through an identity rented from someone who can, has not gone away. It has simply become harder to spot. Put the two facts together. A record number of young Britons cannot get a foot on the first rung of the labour market, priced out by costs the government itself imposed. At the same time, the first-rung jobs are being done anyway, documented, named, on the record, by people the system says should not be working at all. Nobody designed this as a system. Nobody has dismantled it either. Years after the Midland Hotel investigation, the high street looks exactly the same. "Researchers at Nottingham Trent and Heriot-Watt found migrant couriers earning between £900 and £1,500 a month."
38
442
912
16,113
Haitch7 retweeted
My brief take on @GBNEWS re Labour's 2-tier social media ban for u 16s. Somehow Starmer forgot to ban Bluesky. They're such numpties: so keen to contol how plebs communicate, they forget to control their own comms & make their biases blatantly obvious. wa.me/447976628584?source=ex…
110
1,357
4,900
99,072
Haitch7 retweeted
Whatever is going on in the world, Thomas Sowell always got there first and summed it up perfectly.
148
2,706
12,823
106,686
Did someone who desperately needs some good PR ask for this to be conducted and filmed ? Hugely concerning if so. Why did he decide on this one op given all of the many he’s just ignored
MoD forced to deny Marines tanker raid was 'staged for the cameras' after 'serious questions' emerge gbnews.com/news/russian-tank…
1
45
Why do they deem bluesky as safe?
"But Bluesky's fine."
1
1
79
I can’t be the only person who just cannot stomach listing to his dull, nasal robot speak.
Have you ever seen someone get so excited about banning kids from using YouTube? He's actually giddy with glee Complete sociopath
2
5
74
Haitch7 retweeted
The Supreme Court was clear. Women and girls are entitled to single-sex spaces. Now John Swinney is talking about taking a 'domestic approach' – whatever that means 🤷‍♀️ @MeghanSCUP has written to the First Minister to ensure women and girls' rights will be protected.
8
57
151
3,727
RT @sandieshoes: So Starmer heads to the G7 tomorrow as a weak leader whose authority is crumbling at home and about to face absolute humil…
152
Haitch7 retweeted
You look at Labour this week and wonder if anyone in government is thinking straight. Assisted dying back in Parliament. Labour MPs planning a “summer of sex”. Billions for cycle lanes while defence is underfunded. It’s like the Labour students union is running the country. Britain needs focus. Defence. Energy. Work. Security. Growth. So I’m giving a speech at 11am today on how we solve the problem of Defence funding. The Conservatives are doing the hard thinking because our country deserves better than gimmicks, drift and fatuous nonsense.
250
437
3,122
91,303
Haitch7 retweeted
Ugh. This is DISGUSTING @LushLtd. Teenage girls love to shop in your stores and here you are happily encouraging them to CUT OFF THEIR HEALTHY BREASTS in the name of trans pride. This is beyond repulsive. It's dangerous and sick. No parent should allow their child near your stores. Please share: #BoycottLushNow
Dear Lush (cc Chelmsford City Council), As a woman who had half a breast removed last year due to cancer, I am writing to raise my concerns about your “Proud of My Stripes” window display. I am also, on behalf of other women who have experienced breast cancer, respectfully requesting its removal. Because mastectomies are not a fashion statement, an identity marker or something to be celebrated. They are something women undergo because they are ill, because they are frightened, because they are trying to stay alive. Around 59,000 women are diagnosed with breast cancer in the UK every year. Many will undergo surgery - a mastectomy, lumpectomy or other procedure. Others choose preventive mastectomies because they carry a high-risk BRCA gene mutation. If a woman chooses to have her breasts removed to affirm a gender identity, that is her personal choice. I honestly don’t know the number of women who have elective mastectomies for this reason. What I do know is that it is a tiny number compared with those for whom breast surgery is medically necessary and not something to be celebrated. I think I speak for many women who have experienced breast cancer - and for their families - when I say this: Breast removal surgery is not something I regard as cute, playful or empowering. Nor is it something I believe retailers should be celebrating. For that reason, I am requesting that the display be removed and that @ChelmsCouncil apologise for promoting it on social media. Yours sincerely, Janet Murray
653
3,917
17,413
530,746
Haitch7 retweeted
Under Keir Starmer's govt, 16 year olds will be legally able to have sex and get the right to vote, but they won't be allowed to buy a pint or watch YouTube after 8.30pm. Okeydokes, that seems perfectly sensible.
367
1,515
10,761
190,053
Haitch7 retweeted
So we just let Internet curfews for 17-year-olds happen, like we're North Korea or China, and no one bats an eyelid because "social media bad"? This is sinister, controlling, dangerous stuff.
81
615
3,979
42,468