So now we've gone from the already-absurd "tens of thousands" to "ONE HUNDRED THOUSAND"... Sigh.
The claim that Iran "slaughtered tens of thousands" or "ONE HUNDRED THOUSAND" has always been very obviously sensationalist source-free nonsense. Anyone who has studied the history of war and totalitarian regimes knows this.
Actual crackdowns, even on a large and brutal scale, simply do not kill anywhere close to that many people because once the machine-guns come out, almost everyone immediately scatters and flees. Shooting down running people is actually a lot harder in real life than in Hollywood movies. Only a small fraction actually get hit.
As a point of comparison: The Hungarian uprising in 1956, which engaged in actual armed resistance rather than mere protests and which the USSR ruthlessly crushed over several weeks with soldiers and tanks, only killed about 3,000-4,000 people.
Tienamen Square, with the Chinese army firing on a huge gathering of unarmed protesters, killed several hundred, perhaps a thousand at most. (Many more were arrested and Gulag'd later, of course.)
So the real number of Iranian dead is almost certainly measured in thousands, not tens of thousands.
Indeed, even HRANA, a US-based Iranian expat org, only claims to have "confirmed" 7,000 deaths. The real number is more likely to be lower, though probably not as low as the roughly 3,000 officially admitted by the Iranian government.
Why exaggerate and sensationalize this so much? Well, probably because the reality, grisly and cruel though it is, isn't sufficiently shocking to justify a fanatical war-to-the-knife viewpoint on the Iranian conflict.
We can and will do better than a corrupt, incompetent like Trump and specious comments like yours.
One hundred thousand Iranians depended on the US to take to the streets and were killed.
Israel absorbed hundreds of ballistic missiles for nothing.
China & Russia await us.