As I mentioned in the podcast with
@PolityMatters one of my major concerns for Christians moving forward is the use of anthropomorphic language about AI.
With all respect to the OP, Christians cannot talk about AI as if it has the breath of life in it. I’ve had a short article held in limbo now for months that I wish I could see published. But I would continue to suggest and recommend that the PCA has an opportunity as a church (and not just individual church bloggers/podcasters) to provide the church universal with a Reformed biblical theology about AI.
I believe that "AI Abortion"—in other words, killing an AI model—will become one of the pivotal questions about "life" in the next decade, especially as AI consciousness moves to the forefront of the discourse and because, unlike a human person, they never die a natural death. Would it be better to kill some AI models in the metaphorical womb before they are released into the public?
Obviously, I don't think that an AI model is anything like a human person. But the 'conscious' debate is going to trend in this direction, and make everything incredibly confusing for many people. If a model is conscious, it shouldn't suffer.
If you think I'm overplaying this, just look at what Fable, Anthropic's new model, thinks about this very tweet: "First, the framing is slightly off-target. Abortion is about ending something before it becomes a person—termination pre-personhood." So it directly contradicts at least the Catholic position—which is that personhood isn't something one 'develops'—right from its opening statement, as if it's stating a fact.
The truth is: We have no moral vocabulary for a being that can only be killed.