If I had Elon's money I would solve world hunger instantly.😡 Sent from a device purchased with with a sum of money that could have been used to feed an Ethiopian family for a year, but wasn't, because my generosity is purely hypothetical.

Elon Musk has enough money now to fix every McDonald's ice cream machine, but he won't because he only thinks of himself.

Over 4000 workers just became millionaires by owning the means of production and the socialists are pissed

get these lunatics out of government.

Fun fact: Canada's new AI Strategy includes the word 'indigenous' over 6 times more than 'GPU'

Looking forward to buying $xrp at 15 cents again.

#btc im just tuning in for the excuses.

Its 100% racism but its not "real" racism. Not "really". Nobody in Canadian media will ever cover this story. @CTVNews @CBCNews

Don’t let this go viral though.

⚡️The deeper signal is youth risk did not disappear. It migrated inward. Teen drinking fell because the old physical world of adolescence got dismantled. Alcohol belonged to a social ecosystem: unsupervised time, cars, parties, local jobs, malls, basements, boredom, flirting, older siblings, house gatherings, and the chaotic peer world where teenagers learned who they were by colliding with other people in real space. That ecosystem was replaced by phones, surveillance, parental tracking, algorithmic entertainment, social anxiety, online status games, and a much thinner physical commons. So the surface looks healthier. Fewer kids drinking. Fewer kids using weed. Fewer kids doing reckless things in public. The hidden layer looks worse. The young are less reckless because they are less socially embodied. Less initiation. Less unsupervised friction. Less courage-building. Less embarrassment and recovery. Less real dating. Less independence. Less contact with the physical world before adulthood demands it. The old teenage world produced damage, stupidity, alcohol abuse, pregnancy risk, fights, accidents, and bad decisions. No need to romanticize it. But it also produced social reps. It forced young people through discomfort. It made them practice attraction, rejection, conflict, reputation, risk, repair, and status in the open. The new world suppresses visible risk while increasing invisible fragility. That is the trade. A teenager can avoid drinking, avoid parties, avoid sex, avoid driving, avoid real confrontation, avoid rejection, avoid shame, avoid danger, and still arrive at 23 emotionally underbuilt. Cleaner behavior does not automatically mean stronger formation. This is why the marriage chart and the teen drinking chart are the same story at different stages. People are not suddenly failing to pair in adulthood. The whole pathway into embodied adulthood has been slowing for years before marriage even becomes the question. The real truth: society solved part of the teen vice problem by shrinking the arena where teenagers become adults. It took away the dangerous commons and replaced it with controlled isolation. The result is safer kids with weaker initiation into real life.

dear @CapcomUSA_ could you please finish the Maximo trilogy. Sophie has been missing a long long time now.

A submissive woman actually controls a man. Most people are too low IQ to understand this. Especially modern women. Masculine men don't submit to loud women. Not to arrogance. Not to masculine energy. Not to women constantly trying to dominate everything. That kills attraction fast. But a feminine woman? A peaceful woman? A woman who knows how to soften a man instead of fighting him? She can influence him deeper than any "boss bitch" ever could. Submission was never weakness. It was psychological leverage. Soft power. Quiet power. Ancient feminine intelligence. Women abandoned it because modern culture trained them to hate femininity. A man will sacrifice for peace. He will move mountains for the woman who makes life feel lighter. But he becomes emotionally cold toward women who treat relationships like warfare. Modern women think power comes from attitude, arguments, and acting emotionally untouchable. Wrong. That only works on weak men. The loud girl gets attention. The submissive, feminine girl get commitment, protection, investment, and a ring. There are levels to female intelligence. Masculine men don't respond to control. They respond to loyalty, peace, grace, and genuine respect. That is what makes a powerful man emotionally fold. A submissive woman rarely has to beg. The man gives willingly. Because peace makes a man generous naturally. Pressure makes him distant. Modern women were told acting like men would make them powerful. Now many are single, angry, combative, and confused why their relationships keep failing. The married woman doesn't control him loudly. She controls his heart quietly. Effortlessly. Gracefully. Without force. A true feminine woman doesn't lose power through submission. She multiplies it.

BREAKING Frances Widdowson Arrest: Free speech advocate, Dr. Frances Widdowson, known for challenging the Aboriginal industry, was just arrested at Lethbridge University. RebelNews.com

Pedophilia is wrong on Epstein Island but not in Islam. x.com/InesBetancur1/status/2…

The year is 1950. Your doctor lights a cigarette and tells you smoking is fine. He read it in a study. He is telling the truth about having read it. He does not know, or is not saying, that the study was funded by the tobacco industry. The year is 1958. Your doctor tells you to eat less fat. The evidence is contested. The contestation is not in the public messaging. The food industry has been helpful in clarifying which findings deserve attention. Some researchers who published contradictory data have been quietly defunded. Ancel Keys is on the cover of Time magazine. The year is 1962. Your doctor prescribes thalidomide to your pregnant wife for morning sickness. It has been approved. The FDA gave it the green light in Europe. Twelve thousand children will be born with severe limb malformations before anyone in an official capacity acknowledges the problem. The families are told the drug was safe. The drug was approved. Both of these things remain true. The year is 1972. Your doctor prescribes Valium. Britain is in the grip of a benzodiazepine wave that will last two decades. The dependency risk is known internally. It is not shared. Your doctor is not lying to you. He was not told either. The year is 1999. Your doctor prescribes Vioxx for your arthritis. It is newer than ibuprofen, well-tolerated, and Merck has a study showing it works. Merck also has internal data suggesting it roughly doubles the risk of heart attack. This data will not reach your doctor for four more years. Fifty thousand people are estimated to have died in the interim. Merck eventually settles for 4.85 billion dollars. No criminal charges are brought. The year is 2002. Your doctor prescribes OxyContin. Purdue Pharma trained its sales representatives to tell doctors the addiction risk was less than one percent. That figure came from a letter, not a study. The letter was about patients with terminal cancer on short-term doses in hospital settings. Your doctor is a GP with a patient who has a bad back. Nobody draws a distinction. Nobody is required to. The year is 2008. Your doctor checks your cholesterol. Your LDL is elevated. You are prescribed a statin. Nobody mentions that the number needed to treat for primary prevention is approximately 250. Nobody mentions that the muscle deterioration you'll notice over the next two years is listed as a rare side effect rather than a documented pattern affecting a meaningful percentage of patients. The trial that informed the prescription was funded by the manufacturer. Now it is today. Your doctor has new guidelines. New studies. New consensus. He is confident. He has always been confident. The confidence has never been the problem. The confidence is, in fact, precisely the problem.

Finland tracked every gender-referred adolescent in the country for up to 25 years. Their psychiatric needs didn't improve after 'gender reassignment'. They surged. A landmark peer-reviewed study just dropped. Here's what it found. 🧵

He is spot on.

At the NGen N3 Summit, I spoke to a room full of builders shaping Canada’s future — innovators, creators, and companies ready to move this country forward. Our job as government is simple: back these companies to make people believe in Canada, buy in Canada, and build in Canada. That’s Team Yes. 🇨🇦 Lors du sommet NGen N3, je me suis adressé à une salle remplie de bâtisseurs qui façonnent l’avenir du Canada : des innovateurs, des créateurs et des entreprises prêts à faire avancer ce pays. Notre rôle en tant que gouvernement est simple : soutenir ces entreprises afin que les gens croient au Canada, achètent au Canada et construisent au Canada. C’est ça, l’équipe du « Oui ».

This weekend, NDP members elected self-declared “eco-socialist” Avi Lewis @avilewis as their leader. Lewis has called for a full ban on new pipelines and all fossil fuel development, at a time when the world needs Alberta energy more than ever. And while Naheed Nenshi @nenshi may try to distance himself, the Alberta NDP’s own constitution makes clear they are tied to the federal party. The truth is, the Alberta NDP has a long track record of opposing pipelines and energy development. Their extreme views are a danger to jobs and affordability. The UCP will never stop fighting against radical forces, including the Alberta NDP, who want to shut down our economy and keep our resources in the ground.