Assistant Professor at the Medical University of Warsaw. For several years, I have been making attempts to improve the quality of biostatistics worldwide.

Joined January 2022
88 Photos and videos
Pinned Tweet
A few days ago I was notified to become the chair of the just established Statistics Working Group of the World Association of Medical Editors (BMJ, Lancet, etc.). @i_yakoub_agha @_atanas_ @EmmaGuttman @sminaev2015 @ScienceCommuni2 @TheLancet @EAACI_HQ @WAME_editors @PinkasJJ
4
5
10
1,753
Honored to be recognized once again as a Top Reviewer for Allergy. Thank you to the Editors for this distinction. @AllergyEaaci
1
1
115
Grateful for the opportunity to work with my mentee from Ethiopia through the @ASCP_Chicago Mentorship Program and turn mentorship into a published scientific collaboration.
15
Can AI truly support statistical analysis and statistical peer review? Where are its limits? In this review, I synthesize the 2023–2025 evidence and discuss its implications for internal medicine. @PolishArchives @ScienceCommuni2 @Eur_Sci_Ed @EurekAlert @WCRIFoundation
1
40
Following an editorial invitation, my article “Why listening to learners matters in medical education reform” was published in @bmj_latest and shows that learner informed, practice oriented education improves outcomes and reduces stress.
14
I am pleased to serve as Guest Editor of the IJMS Special Issue "Biostatistics and Data Analysis in Molecular Sciences." It promotes rigorous biostatistical standards to improve reliability and interpretation of molecular research. @MDPIOpenAccess
1
19
The BMJ News article highlights optimism in medicine and public health. Drawing on over 𝟱𝟬𝟬 statistical peer reviews conducted in 2025, my short piece in The BMJ shows that this optimism is weakened by persistent flaws in statistical reporting. @bmj_latest @GlobalHealthBMJ
27
Michał Ordak retweeted
Congratulations to Dr. Ordak receiving Allergy’s Top Reviewer Award. journalallergy.com #Topreviewer #Allergy_journal
1
5
184
I’m pleased to share that I received two individual Rector’s Awards: a first-degree award for research on WAME members’ views on statistical peer review and a second-degree award for a study on Polish medical students’ views on biostatistics. @PolishArchives @BioMedCentral
1
43
Today in @scholarlykitchn I discuss how clear statistical guidelines can help reduce the pressure for “nice” results and support authors, reviewers and editors. scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/…
27
In BMJ I argue that medical education works when it meets real needs; contextual biostatistics teaching improves learning, research quality and patient care. bmj.com/content/390/bmj.r191… @bmj_latest
20
Michał Ordak retweeted
AI-Assisted Statistical Review: Could It Have Averted Retractions? A Case-Based Perspective From #Immunology. Michal Ordak Read the article here: doi.org/10.1111/all.16669 This study explores the potential and limitations of using AI models to assist in the detection of statistical flaws during peer review. Using #ChatGPT and #Gemini Advanced 2.0, three retracted articles due to statistical errors were queried with questions regarding statistical errors, test assumptions and reporting clarity. Although both models identified issues in all of the articles, their inherent limitations are discussed. Read more articles published in #Allergy here: journalallergy.com #allergy_journal
2
3
215
Pleased to share my review just published in Allergy: a structured, example-based overview of statistical methods in allergy & immunology to support transparent reporting and sound interpretation. onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/… @AllergyEaaci @EAACI_JM @EaaciKH @pai_eaaci @EAACI_HQ
1
5
234
Proactive use of the SAMPL Guidelines improves clarity, acceptance rates, reviewer consensus, reduces errors and review rounds. @ElsevierConnect @WileyGlobal @SpringerNature @OxUniPress @CellPressNews @tandfonline @i_yakoub_agha sciencedirect.com/science/ar…
20
Michał Ordak retweeted
#Ewaluacja, jeśli ma wspierać jakość, powinna uwzględniać także takie aspekty, jak rzetelność prowadzenia badań. Wymaga to zmian w systemie, który obecnie kładzie zbyt duży nacisk na liczbę publikacji – uważa @MichaOrdak ⤵️ forumakademickie.pl/jak-ocen…
2
8
517
I wrote about how the pursuit of statistical significance distorts science and harms researchers' mental health. @Eur_Sci_Ed @ScienceCommuni2 @i_yakoub_agha @pensoft @TheLancet @JAMA_current @Nature @NatureMedicine @NEJM @ISID_org @LabMedicineEIC @PLOSMedicine @BioMedCentral
1
1
65
For those interested, coverage related to the article has also appeared in a few science and media platforms: @EurekAlert @EurekAlertAAAS: eurekalert.org/news-releases… @alphagalileo: alphagalileo.org/Item-Displa… @physorg_com: phys.org/news/2025-07-psycho…
20
@PolishArchives - Thank you once again for the opportunity to publish my 2024 article on statistical peer review. That work has now been cited in my eLetter published in Science, in response to H. Holden Thorp’s editorial on political pressure in academia.
37