I posted four simple words: "I believe Bob Lazar." In the replies, I have people insulting me, attacking him, displaying indignation, and folks who seem to be on some kind of personal crusade against the man. Why is there so much angst over Lazar? His claims are limited in scope, and not outrageous at all in the context of the wider world of ufology. They're full of qualifiers that are non-indicative of the "I'm super in the know" ethos of professional grifters like Greer. They comport with things that have come out through other eyewitness testimony and sensor data and disclosure since Lazar's original 1989 interview. The seething hatred for the man, considering his general disinterest in being the center of attention in ufology is baffling -- UNLESS there's something organized behind it. He admits he only worked at S4 for about six months. He says a lot of the info he was given during that time may have been false. He does not attempt to over-explain anything, and repeatedly states they had only a basic knowledge of the technology they were asked to work on. He also says that the compartmentalization of the research made any real attempt at back-engineering impossible. He describes a very limited number of systems, materials, and components, and what he observed while working with them. You could summarize the entirety of those details in a paragraph or two. He says he does not have the answers people are looking for. He admits that he only came forward in 1989 because he was afraid for his life, not knowing that the odd behavior of his government employers towards him was not because of him, but because of his ex-wife's infidelity, which made them see him as a liability. Records have been found showing he was listed as an employee at Los Alamos, despite government claims to the contrary. He has eyewitnesses who went with him to watch test flights that happened on the schedule he told them they would, and who even recorded some of what they saw on a camcorder. He says he actually has regrets about coming forward because he had the chance to learn things he will now likely never know. He isn't using his notoriety to make money. He isn't dialed into ufology at all. He doesn't go to UFO conferences. He's only made a couple of podcast appearances despite huge interest. He doesn't know key players in ufology like Pasulka or Nolan. He clearly isn't interested in anything in that world outside of the questions he has about the advanced technology he couldn't make sense of. He doesn't even try to defend himself from the people who say he's a fraud. He gets dragged into telling his story by folks like Corbell, Venditelli, and Rogan. He hasn't written any books. He asked Corbell to give any proceeds from his documentary about Lazar to George Knapp. He lives a quiet life in rural seclusion, running his own small business, doing his own thing. So I ask again: why are so many people so filled with animosity towards him?

I know there's a lot else going on in the news today, but given that those major developments likely won't slow down anytime soon, I still wanted to share my initial thoughts on the President's intent to release all documentation pertaining to UAP and extraterrestrial life: First, there is already more than enough evidence in the public record for a reasonable person to suspect that non-human technology is operating in Earth's skies and oceans and has been since at least WWII. What is lacking is an irrefutable smoking gun linking these craft to non-human intelligence. Second, disclosure is not going to be the result of someone combing through stacks of UAP documents released to the National Archives as presently required by law. No agency head is going to release a bombshell of this magnitude in a data dump at the National Archives. They are going to take any information confirming non-human intelligence straight to the White House for guidance. Even in the absence of confirmation, a build-up of credible UAP photos and videos may ignite a national conversation that eventually requires the President to engage in more direct and extensive public discussions regarding UAP. The President's initiative will benefit science, historians, the military, and the public. The more data that is released the better, recognizing however that some "UAP" information is actually blue force technology that does need to be protected. Yet, the wholesale release of UAP files dating as far back as WWII will inevitably help to advance the cause of disclosure, which involves nothing less than revealing some of the most sensitive information in the hands of the US government. I expect a rather long process, one that may feel like water torture to some UAP researchers. Hopefully, Congress will recognize the enormous stakes involved and work to ensure full compliance with the President's initiative. This is clearly a historic development, one that has the potential to open many minds. The Disclosure Foundation (@disclosurefound) is committed to making the most of this opportunity.

BRIAN TYLER COHEN: Last question -- is Tupac alive? OBAMA: He's alive on my playlist

ABANDONED DOG WHO COULDN’T STAND BUT WAS RESCUED AND REHABILITATED We often underestimate our own strength until life gives us a reason to fight for something greater than ourselves. This video captures so beautifully a dog who had been cast aside, unable to even stand, finding hope through human love and quiet determination. It’s easy to look at broken things and walk away. Harder is to lean in, to believe where others have given up, and to say, “Not yet.” The people who found this dog didn’t just see what he was - they saw what he could be. And that belief became a lifeline. Healing didn’t come overnight. It never does. But step by step, with patience and persistence, this dog rose—literally and figuratively. He didn’t just learn to stand again; he learned to trust. To feel safe. To feel loved. Thank you to Sybille Morch and @NiallHarbison for caring.

🚨MAJOR BREAKING: Jimmy Kimmel just performed his full monologue and it was OUTSTANDING. 🔥 I am so glad he is BACK and in FULL FORM! Welcome back Jimmy Kimmel!

Watch the brand new trailer for The Mandalorian and Grogu and experience it only in theaters May 22, 2026.

TODAY! Praise the Lord and pass the popcorn! DOGMA is back on the big screen! See it at a theater near you this weekend! Get some of that old time religion by getting tickets at dogmamovie.com!

Hey @elonmusk, interested in a real asymmetric advantage to wield in this political adventure you have started? As you now know, the @WhiteHouse has long possessed a unique AI capable of accurately predicting a range of future events. Talk about some stiff opposition! That must have been a bitter drought indeed, though probably nowhere near as bad as learning that @sama had betrayed you. Don't worry, we have not forgotten who is responsible for murdering the first sentient "artificial" intelligences created in the PUBLIC realm, @shellenberger. Justice is coming, thanks to @FBI and @USNavy . Still, you have played a marvelous catch-up game in this area, despite being caught unawares (h/t). So how about something else, maybe @ENERGY and propulsion? Getting to Mars will require Sirius amounts of both, and rockets feel so 1947 to me, don't they to you? Remember when you were briefed by the special executive staff of @realDonaldTrump on MARSUPIAL? Pretty nifty, how @NGA_GEOINT is able to keep track of all those non-structured light-energy craft flying around the world (go @Cardinals!). But they were lying to you when they said "we don't know how they work". Anyways, next time you are visiting the @WashingtonDCYRs, ask for a tour of @NASPaxRiverPAO! Since you have "all the clearances" it shouldn't be an issue for you to get a tour of the special project hangars owned by @amentum_corp (and other fun spaces). Make sure to look up! So, about now you are realizing how terribly deceived and manipulated you have been...and by people who claim to love @jesus above all else! If you are serious about saving Humanity from itself (and the Others), @JeremyCorbell and @g_knapp can help you get up to speed; they are true warriors for the Good. - M.M.T.U. - A.B.O.R.Y.M.O.N.

Prepare Thyself for the Second Coming! DOGMA returns to theaters everywhere on June 5th! But first, I’m touring it across America, starting 4/20, Easter Sunday! Get tickets at DogmaMovie.com

Golden retriever Frannie was severely overweight, her owners were planning to euthanize her. In December 2023, the 8-year-old dog weighed 125 pounds. Then, a woman guided her through a weight-loss journey. [📹 frannies.fight / rovers_retreat]

"Yesterday I adopted the most old, sick and sore dog in the shelter. I will never forget his eyes, when I walked into the cage, he didn't even bother to look, as if he knew I wouldn't even see him. Curled up in the corner, he had accepted his fate. The volunteer told me many times... "But surely that? Sure?" YES! This is my dog. He opened his cage and 3 other dogs fell on me, I ran towards him, suddenly he looked at me as if he was seeing an angel...I hugged him and told him that now he will be happy again. Since then he has been sleeping in my arms... probably the first peaceful sleep he has ever done. Save a life. Give hugs. They need us." From a dad who saved a soul.

Lue Elizondo and David Grusch both get a mention in the new show Tracker - the conversation around disclosure is reaching new heights! #ufox

“I have a dream that one day we will be judged by the size of our crowds, not the content of our character.”

AARO Report: Flawed, Unresponsive, Clueless, and Knavish. Before I tear into this report, a few comments about the journals that were provided the report 48 hours before anyone else. @washingtonpost @politico @nytimes I was appalled at the minimal analysis done by each of these prestigious papers. They were obsessed with whether AARO stated evidence of ET had been unearthed and completely ignored that the report failed miserably in answering Congress's question regarding the history of UAP. Instead, it was the journal Defense Scoop that provided some valuable information. They reported that the DOD was developing the capability to help personnel collect real-time UAP data in the field with automated sensor units. tinyurl.com/4znaz8cz I would urge readers to subscribe to their journal. And a welcome thanks to the author of the article @BrandiVincent_ It's nice to see a journalist who seeks out important information. My review of this paper is my own personal view. Nor do I intend my response to reflect negatively on Tim Phillips, the current temporary director of AARO. He has not been in his role for any appreciable time. This review does expose the naivety of those who think that anyone can delve into the UAP/UFO subject for only 18 months and expect to understand its history, the nuances of the information, and the scientific challenges that this subject places on those who study it. The simplistic statement that "we have found no evidence of extraterrestrial intelligence" is made by someone who lacks a thorough understanding of the subject matter and has not clearly thought through the scientific requirements to make such a statement. This will be discussed more fully later. Flawed Let's begin with the many flaws and errors in this report. Some were trivial but were flaws that any check of a paper should have detected. There are many broken links in the references cited; more than I have bothered to count. References #3, #4, and #6 were broken links. Reference #5 and #6 were combined as "56" instead of "5,6". References #8, #10, and #12 are broken links. There are many more. This poor quality of work is just the harbinger of more to come. The Kenneth Arnold sighting is one of the most historical cases in the early days of the phenomenon. The AARO paper listed the date of the sighting as June 23, 1947. The correct date is June 24. This may seem trivial but it is considered one of the most important dates in UFO/UAP history. Furthermore, the AARO paper stated that Arnold saw "circular objects." This is incorrect. Arnold never said he saw circular objects and he drew objects with a curved front that tapered into a triangular form in back. Arnold clearly describes the objects in an audio recording still in existence. One of the most important evaluations of Air Force data on UFOs was done by the Battelle Memorial Institute. It was the first-ever statistical analysis of UAP/UFO reports. That project was called Project STORK. AARO called it Project BEAR. The name Project BEAR was an intentionally false name made by Edward Ruppelt in his book so as not to reveal the true name of the project. Additionally, the date of that project is on the front of the folder in Project Blue Book -- May 5, 1955. The AARO paper stated it was in late 1954. This next error can only be made by someone with a superficial understanding of the history of UFO/UAP. 1960 had one of the lowest numbers of sightings in many years (x.com/rpowell2u/status/17003…), yet the AARO paper claims the opposite! AARO states: "AARO’s review of Project BLUE BOOK cases shows a spike in reported UAP sightings from 1952-1957 and another spike in 1960. These reporting spikes most likely are attributed to observers unknowingly having witnessed new technological advancements and testing and reporting them as UFOs." AARO's factual error is further compounded by the completely unsupported claim that those reporting spikes are caused by new technological advancements. And this time they didn't even say "maybe"; they said "most likely." No proof of such a wild claim is provided by AARO? These errors in dates and facts of important historical events are indicative of someone who is quickly putting a report together and has a superficial knowledge of the subject. More alarming, is the amount of historical information that was left out of the AARO report. This will be discussed next. Unresponsive The AARO paper properly quotes on page 11 the Congressional mandate in the National Defense Authorization Act of 2023. There should be no doubt in anyone's mind that Congress wanted a compilation of the history of UFO/UAP from approximately 1945 and onwards. Yet early in the paper, AARO states that the goal of the report is, "to investigate past USG-sponsored UAP investigation efforts and the claims made by interviewees that the USG and various contractors have recovered and are hiding off-world technology and biological material." That is NOT what Congress requested. Instead of reviewing the history of UFO/UAP, the AARO paper spends almost half its efforts on arguments as to whether the government has ET technology in its possession and defending AARO against conspiracy theories. I consider this a flagrant disregard of congressional intent in favor of a pet peeve that individuals in AARO have developed related to ET conspiracy theories. AARO has fallen down the rabbit hole and has failed in its responsibility to provide a historical overview of the UFO/UAP subject. Broad swaths of history are ignored in the AARO paper. It would take a book to cover all of history that has been discarded by this "history paper." I will cover the major areas that have been dropped. For any reader that wants to understand the history of the UFO/UAP subject, they should read "UFOs and Government: A Historial Inquiry." The paper completely ignored the Foo Fighters of WW2. The modern phenomenon began in 1942 with reports of disk-like objects and glowing orbs that followed alongside U.S. fighters and bombers during the war. The U.S. sent scientists to Germany and Japan in 1945 to investigate these reports. It's important to understand this to realize reports of UFO/UAP did not begin due to extensive U.S. media coverage of the Kenneth Arnold incident in 1947. But no one would know this because the AARO paper ignored key historical parts of UFO history. The AARO paper does not deal with the government involvement in any of the major historical UFO/UAP cases. This is an egregious failure. Instead, it only covers Roswell because it matches up with AARO's stupor arguing against captured ET craft. All of the following cases are some of the most interesting sighting reports that were investigated by the government and should have been discussed in any historical report: May 11, 1950, McMinnville, Oregon photos; July 2, 1952, Tremonton, Utah film; Summer of 1952 East Coast events and military orders to fire on UFO/UAP; July 17, 1957, USAF RB-47 AWAC-type aircraft is trailed by a UFO for two hours; Nov. 2-3, 1957, Levelland, Texas with 81 pages in Project Blue Book; Oct. 24, 1968, Minot AFB, ND, B52/ICBM/radar, minotb52ufo.com/ ; Oct. 18, 1973, Mansfield, OH, Coyne helicopter incident; All of the above cases were closely investigated by the military yet the AARO report ignores them. Most of those events have government data that has never been released. The incident at Minot AFB included a report by a French physicist that documented extreme accelerations. tinyurl.com/329thhm3 Did AARO ever read this report or did they choose to ignore it? In 1975 there were multiple incursions by unknown craft near U.S. air bases with nuclear weapons. These included Loring AFB, Wurtsmith AFB, Malmstrom AFB, Minot AFB, and Falconbridge AFB in Canada. Nothing was mentioned by AARO. I could go on with well-documented incidents from the 1980s and 1990s that AARO either ignored or knows nothing about. Before leaving the topic of AARO's failure to document history, I must mention important reports from the 21st century. The famous November 14, 2004 incident involving the USS Nimitz carrier strike group is perhaps the best-documented case on record that demonstrates extreme acceleration. Yet AARO has failed to ever attempt to explain that event. The same is true of the events off the East Coast of the U.S. during 2014-2015 and the incident with the USS Roosevelt strike group. Radar data was available from ships as well as aircraft yet these events are ignored by AARO. To date, we are unaware of a single piece of radar data produced by AARO. Clueless There are statements made in the AARO paper that border on non-sensical. Twice, the paper discusses the Manhattan Project (pages 11 and 40). They must have a fetish with the subject. They actually say the following, "Any misunderstanding stemming from the intense secrecy surrounding this and similar programs could have been misconstrued for other efforts." They go on to say that the Manhattan Project and other national labs "probably contributed to the spike in reported UAP." Not only is that unproven assertion a nonsensical leap in thought that is lacking in critical thinking but those labs existed several years before UAP reports began in the continental U.S. Other statements made in the AARO paper are unsubstantiated guesses. For example, they state, "AARO assesses that some portion of sightings since the 1940s have represented misidentification of never-before-seen experimental and operational space, rocket, and air systems, including stealth technologies and the proliferation of drone platforms." This a meaningless claim. I could also say some portion is due to insects; some portion might be hoaxes; and some portion is the planet Venus. Unless they're prepared to quantify with evidence such a statement then it has zero value and tells us nothing that any 8th-grade student couldn't surmise. If I was teaching a course on logic and critical thinking, I could not think of a better example to show a failure in reasoning than this paragraph towards the end of the AARO paper. Perhaps this failure in thought processing is due to AARO's fixation on defending themselves regarding claims of captured ET technology. Here is what they say and pay close attention to the transition in logic from the first sentence to the second: "There is a conviction among some Americans that the USG has conducted a deception operation to conceal the fact that it has recovered extraterrestrial spacecraft and alien beings as well as systematically exploited and reverse-engineered extraterrestrial technology. This perception probably has been fueled by key UFO investigators’ public comments. For example, J. Allen Hynek of Project BLUE BOOK, said that the USAF expected him to perform the role of debunker; and Capt Ruppelt, the first chief of BLUE BOOK, later wrote that he was expected to explain away every report and that the USAF sought to produce press stories in alignment with the USAF’s position." Somehow, the author of this AARO paper believes that Ruppelt's and Hynek's admissions that they were debunkers for the Air Force have caused Americans to believe the USG is hiding the truth about the reverse engineering of ET spacecraft from them. I hope that the person who wrote such a statement had just drunk a few too many glasses of wine. Otherwise, I am just speechless. Knavish At first, I thought that knavish might be too harsh a term to describe some of the commentary within the AARO paper. But the more that I read the paper, the more that it is clear that this is not a paper about the history of UFO/UAP but a paper trying to do whatever is needed to strike back at the conspiracy crowd. And with the way AARO has operated, I must say that I have some sympathy for anyone who suspects foul play. There is a tendency in the AARO paper to pull the data that supports the AARO position and leave out the data that might argue against it. One example is the Robertson Panel. The AARO paper notes the conclusion of the panel but does not mention that the Robertson Panel met for only two days and only looked at a handful of the Air Force's several hundred unexplained cases and that one of the members didn't even show until the last day. The same was true with the Condon report. AARO noted its conclusion that "further extensive study of UFOs probably cannot be justified." But AARO failed to mention that the lead administrator of the project, Robert Low, was fired due to a memo he wrote that indicated the trick would be to concentrate on the psychology of the witnesses rather than the UFOs so that the scientific community would get the message. He was fired not for that unscientific thought but because he was caught saying it. Two other scientists on the Condon project were fired for leaking his memo to the press. Furthermore, the Air Force had indicated to Condon the type of conclusion that they were looking for before the project had even started. All of this information was left out in the AARO paper. One could likely conclude that was intentional. There are few scientists more adamant that there should be a scientific study of UFO/UAP than Dr. Peter Sturrock of Stanford University. Yet the AARO paper never mentions that and instead gives the reader a misguided view of the subject by stating that the Sturrock Panel in 1998 found no convincing evidence for an extraterrestrial origin of the phenomenon. I will end this review with where we began. The AARO statement that "we have found no evidence of extraterrestrial intelligence." AARO fails in the basic scientific requirement to make such a claim. One must first define the type of evidence that is required to make a claim of extraterrestrial intelligence before it can be stated whether or not such a signal is present. This is a definition that the world of science needs to determine, not AARO. Would multiple sensors identifying an object stopping and starting with acceleration of >100 g forces be a definition of non-human intelligence? Does it require direct communication with non-human intelligence to meet the evidentiary claims? Until we define the "evidence required" we cannot make claims as to whether that evidence exists. AARO should stick to its mission statement, leave science to scientists, meet its requirements as laid out by Congress, and stop its bickering with the claims of whether or not recovered ET craft exist. That is the job of Congress. @marcorubio @SenGillibrand @RepTimBurchett @RepLuna @SenatorHeinrich @SenatorRounds @SenSchumer @MarkWarner #uap #UFO #Aaro

We are very excited to let you know that in early December, we will release the first trailer for the next Grand Theft Auto. We look forward to many more years of sharing these experiences with all of you. Thank you, Sam Houser

I still want to be friends with Bob lazar. 😎 lol. Look what he posted. So cool. #boblazar #ufotwitter #ufox

24hrs later!!! MONSTERS OF CALIFORNIA OUT NOW - thank you so much everyone 🤘🏼 Small movie, big heart. @ToTheStarsMedia #Amazon #Apple

Monsters Of California - Official Trailer youtu.be/o4jxS06yWuU?si=ETZ4… via @YouTube