So, when anyone says "we need new nuclear," just reply
"investing the same money instead in solar PV produces 5.3 x the energy over 65 years"
That is due to the higher capital cost (15.7 x) and longer delays between planning operation (17-20 y vs 1-3 y) of nuclear
$35 bil buys 35 GW of PV x 8760h/y x 23.2% CF in GA= 71.1 TWh/yr of PV
2.23 GW of nuc x 8,760h/y x 0.9 CF = 17.6 TWh/yr of nuc
-> Vogtle has cost Georgia 53.5 TWh/y going forward, and 71.1 TWh/y for the past 15 y since Vogtle was planned 2006 PV could have started 2008