The Waterfront's Secret. Does it sound familiar in your areas?

Surveillance pricing is completely separate from loyalty programs. They don't need to monitor what you buy in order to give you one cent back on every dollar spent. Evan Solomon is mixing these together hoping you aren't smart enough to know they're different.

The Liberals have been gaslighting Canadians since grocery store goiging has begun. Min Champagne is the leader of the gaslighting pack. These people are reprehensible. Canadian’s will catch on eventually. When?

The federal government has finally acknowledged the practice of surveillance pricing, months after the NDP raised the alarm and sparked a national conversation about it. But the bill doesn’t ban this disturbing practice - in fact, it doesn’t even mention it by name. Instead, it just promises vague regulatory action in the future. In contrast, Wab Kinew’s NDP government in Manitoba is simply making the practice illegal. That’s the only way to stop big tech and big grocery chains from teaming up to gouge consumers. We’ve put this issue on the table, and we’ll keep building public pressure on the government to act decisively: today’s bill does nothing definitive to protect Canadians from this very real threat. thestar.com/politics/federal…

You know you're living in a healthy democracy when everyone has to pay for a VPN to stop the state from spying on them.

Waiting patiently for Liberals to explain to me why neocolonial exploitation is actually progressive /s

You have to read Bill C-34 on The Commission to believe it. It sets the rules on age verification, social media bans, and content removals while serving as combined regulator, investigator and advocate. At the start, Chair alone can be the full Commission. x.com/mgeist/status/20665288…

Stanford grads walk out as Google CEO Sundar Pichai takes the stage as commencement speaker. No mention of AI, unlike other uni speakers getting booed down this year. Story for @sfgate shortly

Maybe the best solution for the Billy Bishop Airport is to close it entirely and reclaim the space for Torontonians to use as parkland. We could call it Toronto Place Park.

Look closely at this photo @VancityReynolds posted, and you’ll see the massive dirt piles of the West Island of Ontario Place. Doug Ford destroyed a beautiful, bustling, waterfront park and animal habitat, all in service of a European MegaSpa company. #onpoli

with the water demanding data centres for mass AI surveillance, could this project be for something other than what they are saying? Or they want their private Epstein island in the center of Toronto like their plan in Albania? x.com/newsincontext1/status/…

RT @atRachelGilmore: THEN WHY IS HE SLASHING ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTIONS AND PENNING DEALS TO BUILD NEW PIPELINES⁉️‼️⁉️‼️⁉️

Again, Metrolinx is for money laundering. Building and maintaining transit is the front.

He's doing more to accelerate climate change than any other G7 country. We're even behind the US for emission reductions since 2005 (only 9% versus 17%)

Toronto Liberal MPs need to find their backbones and stop the Billy Bishop expansion plan fiasco. #Ontario #BillyBishop #airport #NoJetsTO @MarkJCarney

if only the trillion budget waste could have been spent on actual flood control than pockets of Marcos and Crocodile House of Representatives. It could at least mitigate some of the disasters or used for relief

Stealing from terminal and suffering Filipinos should carry a mandatory death sentence by firing squad.

BREAKING: 🇺🇸🇵🇭 Protesters breached police barricades in Manila, advancing toward the US Embassy. The demonstrators are demanding the US troops to be kicked out and opposing the expansion of US military bases in the country.

CMPAC is engaged in ongoing discussions regarding the online harms bill. We continue to work closely with civil society organizations, including OpenMedia and are actively participating in government technical briefings and stakeholder consultations on the Bill. We are guided by the interests and concerns of the communities we serve in these engagements. As these discussions evolve, we will continue to advocate for approaches that effectively address online harms while safeguarding fundamental rights.

Here's a good example of a necessary public policy idea rendered useless by Liberals.